Search results

  1. N

    In Defense of the Trinity

    I appreciate your effort and your non-denominational view. But, I must disagree where I must, and this is one such place, for I see what seems to me to be an interpretation colored by tradition rather than plainly read as any thing may be read that is less than immediately obvious (few things...
  2. N

    In Defense of the Trinity

    To even begin to answer for you your question, I will need to cover some basic ground. God, in the sense of the attributes of God, is what I call God-the-generic (I don't know the term for this concept current among professional theologians). Each of the Divine Persons...
  3. N

    In Defense of the Trinity

    Therefore??? Your deduction is sorely invalid here. 'Father' and 'son' are not proper names, as it were, and only the Only Begotten Son of God-incarnate has a 'proper name': Jesus. When Jesus lived and died, he was indeed the logos of God, as opposed to any exhibited power...
  4. N

    In Defense of the Trinity

    Yes, but even this can be taken too far---and is. Anything can be taken to foolish extremes, even if the person so taking it is convinced that he is not doing so, or that it can't be done for a particular thing. Most Trinitarians who make this claim that Mr. Martin makes do not know that God is...
  5. N

    Science, and its relation to science (really).

    Fallen man has denied God in one way or another. Of all the ways that man might do this, none is more seductive to him than the secular 'scientific worldview'. This was the view implicitly held by Adam at his fall, and it underlies all of his errors. This view is described as the presumption, on...