Search results

You are twisting scripture heavily.... When he says “greater” he indicates that his divinity can be equaled to the Father, since he is of the same substance as him, but the Father is greater because the Son accepted a body…The Son’s nature is understood to be less than that of the Father...

we do immersion this op is about necessity of baptism.

Hebrew Sing שִׁ֤ירוּ ׀ (šî·rū) Verb - Qal - Imperative - masculine plural Strong's 7891: To sing to God! לֵֽאלֹהִים֮ (lê·lō·hîm) Preposition-l | Noun - masculine plural Strong's 430: gods -- the supreme God, magistrates, a superlative Sing praises זַמְּר֪וּ (zam·mə·rū) Verb - Piel - Imperative...

Dan 10:13 (NIV) But the prince of the Persian kingdom resisted me twenty-one days. Then Michael, one of the chief princes, came to help me, because I was detained there with the king of Persia. Dan 10:21 (NIV) ...but first I will tell you what is written in the Book of Truth. (No one supports me...

Correct

this question basically seems to question life without a diety and if its possible and solipsism is a similar view in this discussion if I think about it now not what im questioning though.

My resolution that knowing if your existence is real cannot be resolved without a infinite entity causing its own mere awareness of its existence. It can be God but my resolution more or less proves a soul existence than Gods existence because a singular entity existing with awareness without...

my resolution is similar but not the same

great observation and imput!

I got the argument from Descartes works

so you saying typical dreams within a dream doesnt bring bruises so it negates the possibilities to bring other dream bruises to existence is just fallacious

you can imagine pain in a dream not something impossible deep awareness of your outside existences is not possible simulating pain is always a possiblity

Hard question if reality only exist by our own consciousness, than how do you know we not dreaming and having a lucid dream within a dream within a dream and so on and so forth if reality truly exist than this consciousness should also have its very own awareness of its own dont you think, or...

the wind is crazy

Nihilism may be better understood as an aesthetic rather than a properly mature philosophical position

Emotions are not universal, but are determined by morals and socialisation. Is exactly why its not objective. Secondly, human emotions is more abode from our awareness than morals.

What lol? This is absurd. Morality doesn't depend on physical or natural science, but metaphysics, the study of reality or being. Right depends on what is (i.e. animal rights, human rights, etc).

People can be wrong on what they believe in does not mean they have an moral obligation to argue they are correct . If one believes murdering women is okay, we condemn that person. Since we condemn people, it shows that we presuppose an objective value. There is never a kind of culture that had...

As you probably seen my thread questioning Papacy in Chalcedon. Is the authority of Rome had authority above this or their are arguments that shows that this wasnt the case? I aint looking to argue back just curious on what the RCs thoughts on what the synod meant when they said all churches...

the two natures which came together in union were hypostases … in uniting humanity to Himself, does God the Word assume it only as an abstract reality, without being in a hypostatic or personal condition? If the humanity of Christ doesn't have the features which make it a person, can it function...