Search results

Tiberius didn't say that. Read more carefully before making false claims.

Glad to answer your question as to why 1/6 is taken more serious than your other examples.

Probably has something to do with the fact that an election was in the process of being certified, ya know, a usually benign event. I guess basic Constitutional process isn't a factor for strict Constitutionalists around here. Weird.

Who would you vote for if you had to pick between the two?

You should get in contact with all the lawyers representing the people in this thread. It will likely come as a big surprise to those being charged to find out they weren't Trumpers at all!

Who else did you think I was referring to?

Do let us know when those Cons in the House post here. :oldthumbsup:

Hyperbolic insensitive comparisons ^_^ What will those silly Cons do next?

Ok. I will not complain when police shoot the first person who break past a barricade protecting elected officials, with a mob behind them. I look forward to you holding me up to this standard. Thanks Trumper :oldthumbsup:

It's the new, worse version of Birtherism. Go ahead and ask on these forums who still thinks it was either true or really should be looked into.

The officers were controlling a mob at the barricade, not just a single woman. She crossed the line, the rest of the mob didn't once that happened. Mob controlled. It's a perk of protecting elected officials. You'll notice nobody was shot getting into the Senate chamber. That's a pretty close...

A line was drawn at that barricade. She crossed the line. Nobody else crossed that line. Thus, nobody else suffered that same fate. This isn't that hard. If she was shot at the first window into the Capitol near the entrance when no warnings or barricades were there, you would have a case. But...

Please don't take this the wrong way, but I'm as disappointed as you hopefully are that I had to even ask that question. Please understand the reality I live in that my perception of the Republican party is that it's leaning toward Trump first, everything else second. Given it's Cheney we're...

Methinks someone didn't read the question as carefully as one should.

Which one?

Blasted cancel culture strikes again!

Although possible he was part of CDPR, his post doesn't necessarily follow that he was on it. If you intended that comment to be fully a joke only, then carry on. If not, perhaps reading slower or learning more about the nuances of English could be beneficial.

Well, there were a bunch of them in the Congress chambers when Congress should have been in session, so I'd say they technically did take over the Capitol. The time span was very short, but they successfully interfered with Congressional duties. The overall goal may have failed, but the task of...

Haven't you figured out how easy it is? A source is credible if the specific article lines up with my already held beliefs. Mistakes, corrections, and retractions are also CommuMarxist unacceptables.

That was....something. Thanks for the link.