Search results

Praise be to God who is the author of all the good things and understanding of His creations! The more He shows me and make me understand these things is so humbling. I don't think I'm better or deserving than any of you here. But bless Him for His sovereign grace! May the Lord give all of you...

I've been presenting you arguments based on scientific facts. Do you want me to resort to clay models that is ignorant of DNA?

Because you claim the change in human skin color due to adaptation to the environment is Evolution. Adaptation is a basic defense of the body, just like developing immunity to certain viruses. You keep on throwing in straw man arguments. I never said mankind is the goal of the event that did...

Did you even read the post which you replied to? You did not even try addressing any of the points.

Then, you don't understand how basic organs work. If you're going to rely on random lucky mutations to develop eyes for seeing, for example, randomly flipping values in the gene sequence does not give you all the needed elements to obtain a set of functioning eyes. You need to encode in the...

Afraid to see how the Evolution Theory fails miserably under mathematical probability test? It actually gets worse when you factor in the law that keeps an ecosystem going. Don't forget that the animal life group is interdependent with the plant life group to cycle carbon dioxide and oxygen...

So, your definition of your Evolution now agrees that we have been humans all along since our start? Congratulations for learning the truth!

Okay, I'll guide you to something easy enough for you to understand... 1) Determine how many possible unique DNA combinations in a human genome 2) Think of how many times a year you think a mutation happens on an organism. 3) Divide the figure you get from step #1 by the figure you get in step...

Having a change in the color of your skin or eyes is not evolution.

Yup. You would expect at least an explanation why it's false.

...For those who don't understand DNA and genes.

I didn't say human form is the goal. You are making a strawman argument. But if you work backwards through your Evolution Theory, you would immediately see the amount of simultaneous lucky mutations that needed to happen you would see 3 billion years would not be enough, unless Someone made it...

My estimate is just a few generations, depending on the environmental difference, and the resulting diet. Skin color is the first to show signs of change, you don't have to wait for the succeeding generations to see it.

Adaptation is driven by your body's reaction to a prolonged exposure to an environment. But it doesn't turn you into a different creature.

It's as simple as going back to the previous posts.

You don't need the experts to figure this out. All you need to do is list all the multiple required simultaneous random miraculously lucky stages of mutations. And you will quickly realize 3 billion years would not be enough of a time if all these life on earth came up from evolution. Even...

"My adaptation" is supported by historical facts. Take India, for example....Indians who have been living in its southern states developed dark skins, while those who have been living at northern area have light skins.

You are mixing adaptation in the argument. That's different from evolution. Change in eye color, skin color, hair color, etc. is due to adaptation.

I'm trying to stay on topic with the subject of evolution. If you insist on going that route, you would find yourself agreeing to the fact the planet's lifespan would not be enough to give evolution time to get where we are now.

You must have mistaken me for someone else.