Search results

DIVINE COUNTERFACTUAL FOREKNOWLEDGE Gen 2:17 But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die. This is the first scripture relating to the foreknowledge of God, and it is Molinist. Deu 30:15 See, I...

That was beyond the point of the study, which was simply to prove that "the letter killeth" is not a reference to the concept of literal interpretation. Paul says "we are not under the law". Simple.

2Co 3:6 Who also hath made us able ministers of the new testament; not of the letter, but of the spirit: for the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life. V.6 the letter killeth – When Paul says the spirit (v.6) he defines that as the ministration of the spirit (v.8) – i.e. the preaching of...

May we some day be as spiritual as you.

What? Who said that? The idea is that the body is corrupt because of sin (It feels pain, it gets sick, it stinks, and it dies) but God will change it at the resurrection into an immortal body - hence redemption of our body. Romans 8:23 is there. Ephesians 1 and Colossians 1 are about redemption...

Not redemption of the soul, but redemption of the body, yes. Rom 8:23 And not only they, but ourselves also, which have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body.

Yes, like salvation by grace without works. That was not taught (although hinted at) in the gospels, that is Pauline doctrine for the church.

Sounds like you didn't listen to the video.

Partial truth. God is both out of and in time, as evidenced by scores of verses.

Nice sleight of hand there. Yet Paul's most famous passage about our resurrection says: 1Co 15:35 But some man will say, How are the dead raised up? and with what body do they come? [...] 1Co 15:38 But God giveth it a body as it hath pleased him, and to EVERY seed his OWN body.

That's regeneration (born), not adoption. Two different concepts.

Give one verse where predestination is unto "salvation". One verse.

Many would sorely disagree with the doctrine of this video but I'm presenting it that at least you know how I perceive the gospel teachings of my Lord Jesus Christ. Maybe you are already aware of dispensationalism, and reject it with a passion, but I still think you might at least get some...

Not sure I followed you there. What are you saying?

See #1 in my signature. Classic.

Which is why the most educated Chaldees couldn't figure them out, even with the promise of being promoted to 3rd in the kingdom... Daniel INTERPRETED them into Chaldean. So evidently they weren't originally Chaldean.

Then you should have never commented, or said "we don't know, we'll find out" before shooting it down. Suddenly, now that there's no backing for the unscriptural position, a snobbish spiritual stance is adopted, all the while pontificating that the meticulous scripture-with-scripture...

Non sequitur.

In the Bible, predestination is never, ever, ever, that of lost man unto salvation. Predestination is always that of a saved man unto a glorified Christ's-image-bearing resurrection body. That's what you get if you let the scriptures speak for themselves, in context, and with defining...

I'm pretty sure he communicates what he means by what he says...like you just did. I'm sorry but this is silly. Moving on.