Search results

What has the federal government done? Looks much like the same failure to act that we observed in Afghanistan Biden once again abandons American citizens .

The conclusion I would draw is that Trump had nothing to do with the fact that Mr Wood seems to have some mental health problems, which a little research before attempting to jump to conclusions would have revealed. Attorney Lin Wood loses appeal over state bar's mental health probe

Thanks for jumping to unwarranted conclusions, the game was getting old but some people just love to play dont they

My conclusion is that the investigation is not complete but the Sheriff feels there is sufficient reason to terminate the officers

God does care about you, He love you, He also has a plan for you, maybe you should ask Him what His plan is for you and work towards doing His will.

"two sources familiar with the matter told CNN". Will CNN ever have a real source that they can identify so that others can verify the reliability of their reports, frankly I doubt it since they specialize in being a rumor factory.

NO I would not say that, I would say that if and when he is ever convicted of a crime he can be called a criminal up until then he should not. That is how our legal system works.

Since there was no valid evidence there should have been no investigation, that is what the reports said.

The standard for opening this investigation was a report that was know to be false before the investigation began.

Again the Durham report makes it clear that not only was not any criminal act but the investigation itself was far from above board.

they reported the same incorrect information that the MSM was reporting and now we know for a fact that is was not true.

https://www.exaudi.org/paraclete-three-meanings-of-the-greek-word-hidden-in-the-old-testament/ https://www.gotquestions.org/paraclete-Holy-Spirit.html

Well however anyone wants to look at it is fine, but point in fact they lied and built a narrative to suite there view points.

again the Durham report clears all that up No actually I know the differance between the statements in an indictment and evidence, i would suggest that anyone who does understand the difference should do some research and inform themselves.

all of those statements are pure speculation. Where is the evidence?

simply read the part where it clearly states that there never was any basis for the investigation.

very funny, have a nice day

the proof is in the Durram report which you obviously have not read. In short there never was a basis for the investigation and no evidence of any potential crime.

and all that was put to rest in the Durram report, please read it.

frankly I was surprised that the point of the post was so simple, I was expecting more depth.