Search results

Feel free to quote others who disagreed with the canon if it make you feel better. In the end of the day, the Church had decided. No man is bigger than His Church

I would suspect for the same reason Christ's divinity and humanity was debated over the course of 3 or 4 councils. In the face of heresy, the Church needs to repeat herself, sometimes more than once!

No Correct Of course She did. If that make you feel better. Ok, so you have individuals who didn't agree. So what! What?

Doesn't matter. The Canon had already been approved. The Carthage synod ratified what had already been ratified in Hippo and Rome and approve by Pope Damasus I in 382. The Canon was set

You seem to miss the point. There can certainly be disagreement within the Catholic ranks about almost anything. Just because we had some Catholic theologians argue against these books doesnt mean a thing. In the end of the day, the Church exercising Her magisterial teaching office decided...

This is not the answer to the question.

Yes, I said this. Paul and Clement also corrected Churches. Just because you correct does make you Pope or not make someone Pope. This type of argument isnt too strong. And so it has been up to today. Scripture records that there was much disputing until Peter rose up and settled the...

Scripture records he took bread and took the chalice It indicates He took something and said that It IS something else. If you were expecting conjecture from me just just like you did, I guess I did disappoint. Hoot Hoot

The Bishop of Rome or Pope is the visible head of the Church. Christ is the Head. I'm not familiar with this requirement. Is this an Orthodox requirement only? Doesn't really matter? It has to do with Peter So if James happemed to be the first pope I doubt you would be ok with it.

You are attempting to help Albion. However, your answer is not to the questions I asked him to provide information for. But since you brought it up, I am certain you would not be surprised that there was hearty debate abour the canon of the bible. Jerome himself had questions. All that mean...

I know. I edited my post to clarify

Idk about anti-Catholic but Albion is certainly short on information and communication.

I think this is where you are thinking incorrectly. You have NOT presented facts. I will agree you've presented opinion. I never insinuated gloating. But you haven't passed along information. You stated an opinion. Thank you. God bless

All this is is more of "since I say so it is so." God bless.

The only thing that would make me think you are anti Catholic is your willingness to put out opinions about the RCC and the bible canon without the where with all to back it up. Now, that doesn't mean you are anti Catholic, maybe your just learning about Christianity, I don't know. Your...

I'm willing to listen to all sides. But forgive me if I don't believe you just because "you say so."

Is my exchange with Albion what you were referencing? I ask for some back up to his/her claims (which of course I think are incorrect) and I get this type of attitude.

In other words, you've got nothing. I'll have to remember this if I run across you again. Hopefully this was a one time error on your part. Im giving you the benefit of the doubt. God Bless

I would still like to hear Albion's logic or sources for the 2 claims he/she made.

Yes, I know this is the second time you said this. If you say it again, does it make it true? I'm looking for substantiation. No I would not he doing that. If you do, then that is of course your choice. Wow, being new hear I guess I was expecting a bit more information sharing between...