Search results

Again.. everything is based on the most logical opinion. And what I've provided to you is the most logical opinion. We believe the Egyptians built the pyramids. We were not present, we don't have video footage of them doing so.. but the most logical opinion based on what we have is that they...

Again.. everything is based on the most logical opinion. And what I've provided to you is the most logical opinion. We believe the Egyptians built the pyramids. We were not present, we don't have video footage of them doing so.. but the most logical opinion based on what we have is that...

You're saying the same thing. Only thing that I and possibly others are trying to explain to you is that the portion of the universe that is not subject to time is what I/others reference as "Eternity" and where the outer force that started the portion of our physical universe (the portion...

Because I believe the physical universe has a beginning. It shows signs of forward progression. in order for there to be forward progression there would have to be a starting reference point. Meaning that in order for us to arrive at step 2000.. we would have to be able to reference that...

Absolutely sir, you are correct. The argument with Atheist always ends at "something from nothing". This is the point in which their logic completely falls apart. I personally think it's a failure on their part to understand what a true "nothing" means. Nothing = not only a physical...

This is not speculation. How could there be any movement in our universe without time? How do you plot any point of any object in space on a graph with no coordinates? Every motion represents a single point in "time". And seeing that infinity doesn't exist in a physical universe.. each...

We actually can't say anything with certainty because we don't know all the secrets of our existence or universe. What we can however do.. and what we actually do is take the most probably explanation. The explanation of the Creation of our physical universe being directed by an outer force...

That is basically saying the same thing. If a portion of the universe exists outside of time then that is what Eternity is, and the portion that is subject to time.. is what the "physical universe" is.

That's a simplistic way of looking at things. Regardless of how many multiverses exist.. they couldn't exist without something that isn't subject to time existing. The physical world isn't infinity. You're proposing the existence of a physical infinity which doesn't work.

The universe is subject to time.. meaning there is a starting reference point. In order for there to be a starting point for a universe subject to time there has to be a realm that isn't subject to time to press the start button on our universe. The "Creator" isn't subject to time. Time...

Very interesting.. are the soul and spirit the same? I don't necessarily believe they are. I believe that we exist as a form of a trinity as well.. soul.. spirit.. and physical body. With the spirit being the connection to the physical world... and the soul being what's left after we exit the...

Depends on what you consider the "universe" The physical realm is absolutely subject to time. Time represents movement and progression. Time is a plot in existence that ties certain states to certain points … in order for there to be points that aren't the same as each other, there has to be...

Because I don't pray for every principle that is in place to remain in place doesn't mean that I don't respect the fact that there is nothing that says it has to.. other than the Creator and monitor of these principles. The fact that this all remains in tact is further proof in my opinion of...

Infinite time doesn't exist. That implies that one moment in time is equal to every other moment in time. For instance if infinite exist.. then how do pinpoint a particular moment? Example.. 3 exist.. because 0.. 1... and 2 exist. Each having its proper location. In an infinite system...

Hi Sorry for the late response.. But my answer to this is that there is no trail of evidence that would lead one to logically believe that fire breathing dragons exist. It doesn't fit any logical thought process nor does it mesh properly with the things we understand about the universe...

Hi Sorry for the late response.. But my answer to this is that there is no trail of evidence that would lead one to logically believe that fire breathing dragons exist. It doesn't fit any logical thought process nor does it mesh properly with the things we understand about the universe...

hahaha.. I think we have differing interpretations of what Logic is.. You have 1 mind.. and 1 navigation system for our current reality. You understand math.. you understand science .. you understand physics.. you understand chemistry.. etc. That to me is because everything is written in...

I think you're over simplifying my argument for the sake of you not having a logical rebuttal. " I don't know" ... and "We're a product of Intelligent design" are two very different answers. 1 makes no attempts at answering the questions .. while the other uses logic to come to the most...

You're right.. this is very interesting.. I typically don't debate the Bible because I don't know why anyone should pick it up and consider that it is the word of "God" based solely on it insisting on itself and stating that it is. I've asked many of my Christian brothers and sisters and have...

: ) .. How could you put such little value on logic? Without logic.. there is no Science or math. Logic is the language of our universe. Everything speaks logic. science does.. math does.. everything. To lose logic would be to lose your grip on our perceived reality. Logic and Intellect...