Search results

but one's a horse and one's a donkey, and all your list there is quail. um .... next

Here's the theory of Creation: God created the heavens and the earth. It cannot be proven otherwise, so we must entertain it. You said the scientific method involves inventing and theorizing, so I did.

Believe me, as soon as one shred of evidence supporting evolution is found to be true and scientifically proven, it should be taught in all the schools and applauded over and celebrated. Until that time, get it out of the schools. If Creation isn't allowed, then neither should evolution.

Adolf Hitler, Christian ... kind of like Darwin recanting his findings of evolution on his death bed ... admitting the hoax...LOL

How can evolution be "explained" by scientific methods and "creation" not?

Um, they're both quail! Um, same kind. You just said it, quail aren't two different species. They are quail. A horse is a horse (of course) and a donkey is a donkey. Different species ... let's be real here and quit trying to slide around the truth

I'm sorry ... calling an explanation of something evolving from nothing science? Sorry, it's a religion. Just because you try to explain it with scientific methods does not make it science. You can use the same scientific methods with creation to theorize, and it's still religion. They are...

  Ah, so the evidence for evolution is plenty. Cool. Please enlighten us. Please use facts only, and please document thoroughly, because, after all, we must be scientific.   And of course I don't know everything about the THEORY of evolution. And neither do you. No one does...

 :wave:

You believe in something that has no scientific proof, you are exercising faith. Creationists practice faith, as do evolutionists. We both believe in theories on the origins of life.

  I e-mailed ya, brother. I told you that you won the battle, but you won't win the war. You are much more educated in science that I am, and all I have is my faith. That is what I stand for. You stand for something different, and that is your choice and your free will, and I will...

  Let me reiterate: There is no reproductive evidence to support your beliefs. Sorry.

  Unfortunately, you are trying to compare apples and oranges. Two species of quail (the same kind) are not like the horse and a donkey example (different species). Your argument does not hold water. Sorry.

  I'm afraid you have misspoke: There are no scientific facts about evolution. Sorry.

Well said Patty. My thoughts exactly.

Funny how CNN simply states "3 million years ago" as if it were known fact. Gosh, one time I would like to see a major media outlet say something like: "although unproven, it is believed by some scientists that 3 million years ago..." Our kids and us adults are being bombarded by rhetoric that...

"The first thing we must do is define: evolution. To the scientist, to which many in this forum claim to be, the theory of evolution customarily means a process by which the whole universe came about through a progression of interrelated phenomena. In biology or zoology, the theory of evolution...

Dont tell me it is ok for this to be taught in the classroom. It conflicts with laws of science, so how can it be called science?

OK, evolution man: Here it is. Can you refute this and tell me this is a lie. If you can, then you win. If you cannot, then admit what you think is science is actually religion. The fact that spontaneous generation (the emergence of life from nonliving matter) has never been observed you have to...

I have come to this conclusion after our debate: You have theories upon theories, no hard evidence. Everything is based on assumption and what science believes is the best possible explanation for creation of universe and life. You have proven nothing to me other than the fact that you have read...