Search results

His grandfather was actually his father. Incest. That actually explains it.

The Dems have gone the way of Democratic Progressive rather than Socialist. BTW, Socialism is defined as: a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole...

Capitalism: A Love Story (2009) | WatchDocumentaries.com

You ought to do a search on most politicians, past and present and would be surprised how wealthy they are and most have made investments in real estate just as Pelosi has, just as most of Trumps money has come from. Real Estate is where most of your wealthiest in individuals has come from.

Since in Matthew 11:12 John the Baptist is referenced, what was John's preaching to the Jews at the time? :The kingdom of God is at hand" This is something that I believe the Pharisees and many of the "well-off" Jews didn't like hearing and didn't want Jesus coming to this earth and ruining...

So I guess this means that because Kurt Wise agrees with you on this one point, that you agree with him on every point and because I may disagree with him on one point then I must disagree with him on all points? You forget that part of faith is evidence of things not seen. You really don't...

Well I'm glad you guys finally admit that we didn't evolve from chimps. Is it amoebas then?

Because the evidence is very limited to what you call evolution and is non-conclusive. and there's a much better alternative explanation. The idea that we evolved from monkeys and over billions of years is ridiculous.

It's what the Bible says it is, that's why. Sure. There are physiological changes due to many happenings throughout the earths history, but that doesn't prove that man "evolved" from chimps. According to who? Or He could have simply done it the way He says He did in Genesis. Like Noblemouse...

It's funny how YE is the evolutionists (and atheists) goto argument. Us Christians who believe in a 6 day creation of modern day man (starting with Adam) should disregard earth age. Let the atheists have that one. Without it, man evolving from chimps and evolution of man over billions of years...

The word is the only sure way we can validate the Holy Spirit. There are many false spirits in the world today and the only way we can be sure that we're hearing the Holy Spirit is that what they are telling us lines up with scripture. It's the only way we can tell with a surety that we're...

Earth Age is really all the Atheists can really hang their hats on when it comes to Evolution and is a fruitless argument for Christians to take. It has no bearing on the Bible and what it teaches in Genesis. 1 Timothy 1:4 (KJV) Neither give heed to fables and endless genealogies, which minister...

An old earth doesn't prove evolution nor disproves the Bible.

Only due to ignorance. Interestingly, nowhere in the Bible are we given much information on Jesus physical attributes, therefore His physical appearance is all speculation.

Jesus didn't explain it to the disciples so even if it was a parable it certainly wasn't handled the same way as others were. It's quite possible that many of those Jews at the time knew Lazarus being a beggar, they would have seen him around.

Free will means free choice and in this case it is the freedom to choose or not choose God. We are told that if we choose Him He will take us to heaven some day. This does in no way destroy the "good news" or the gospel (euangelion). How could this be "bad news"?

Are you sure you really wanted them to go away? As for what Jesus does with you, that's for Him to decide, not us.

All this does is point out that there is more than one Lazarus (also shows that this was a Jewish name). The fact that this one passage of scripture uses two persons names (Lazarus, and Abraham whom we all know). Not uncommon in the Bible (and in real life in general) for more than one person to...

Regarding whether or not it's a parable, you'll note that when Jesus is giving a parable, He says so and in Lazarus and the rich man He does not call it a parable which I think is no coincidence. The Bible tells us whether or not it is a parable so it's definitely not ridiculous to say that it's...

Quite illuminating. All great men of God.