Search results

according to evolution if we will find a self replicating robot (or a watch) that made from organic components, we need to conclude that such a robot evolved by a natural process. this is because it has a self replicating system and made from organic components, so its basically like any other...

according to atheism the whole universe (uncluding all the objects inside it)was made by a natural process. thus a natural process can create robots and cars according to atheism. or a natural process+time= a car.

according to that paper a specific function (that is coded by a single gene) will appeare about one in every 10^77 sequences: Estimating the prevalence of protein sequences adopting functional enzyme folds. - PubMed - NCBI it means that to get the same function again we will need about 10^77...

but science prove that such a thing is impossible by experiment. since we know that a part of feces+time= non supermodel. so who is going by scientific experiment and who reject it? also take a look at this suppose "natural gear": (image from Creature with Interlocking Gears on Legs Discovered)

a cell phone need at least several parts for its minimal function. so even if we had a self replicating molecule it will not evolve into something complex like a cell-phone. the same is true for a biological system. for instance: an electric organ need at least several parts for its minimal...

a scientific theory is a theory that we can test. mean it can be falsified. the problem with evolution is that it cant be test. for instance: some evolutionists (like dawkins and others) claiming that if we will find even a single out of place fossil- evolution will be false. but we actually...

although the design argument doesnt depend on the age of the earth, we still need to remember that the age of the earth is a belief rather then a fact. so here are 4 evidence for a young earth: 1) human population growth: according to evolution human population pass the 1 billion limit only in...

my favorite argument for the existence of god (or a designer) is going like this: a) we know that a theoretical self replicating robot that made from organic components is evidence for design. because we know that any robot is evidence for design. b) from a physical perspective a walking...

many of you may heared about the watch argument by william paley (if a watch need a designer because it cant evolve naturally then also nature need one, because its more complex and have a design traits like a watch (the flagellum motor for instance is a real spinning motor found in...

hi. i have an interesting argument: lets say that scientists will create a robot with a living traits like self replication and may contain even DNA. i guess we may all agree that this kind of speciel robot will be evidence for design and not a natural process like evolution. if so: why not...

hi. i have an interesting argument: lets say that scientists will create a robot with a living traits like self replication and may contain even DNA. i guess we may all agree that this kind of speciel robot will be evidence for design and not a natural process like evolution. if so: why not...