Search results

  1. K

    “Generation”, Matthew 25, and Deuteronomy 28-30

    No need to cast doubt or think doubtful about scripture. Hence the cup half empty or full, which perspective does one side with. I do not think majority of preterists or futurists doubt scripture, they just don't grasp the same thought nor see the same as another viewer. While one side can G...
  2. K

    “Generation”, Matthew 25, and Deuteronomy 28-30

    truthfully I describe it as a glass half empty or full dilemma. Futurist mindset seems to look at the aspects of prophecies/events not appearing fulfilled or questionable as to their fulfillment leaving one to have to see that something did not add up right since all prophecy comes to pass...
  3. K

    “Generation”, Matthew 25, and Deuteronomy 28-30

    overall well said, creates a different approach that's not always used. Though I think the second half might deter some if their "new to prophecy", since some shy away from material that negates other schools of thought. Great write up though.
  4. K

    Ex-Muslim Terrorist

    different, how so? Explain how it was any different than the first generation expecting redemption verse 1st century expecting deceptive enemies- they both thought the prophecy was for them. That first generation turned into 100 still expecting redemption, here we are 2k+ years later with...
  5. K

    The Land Promises Have Ended, the Abrahamic Covenant Genesis 17

    If the details we have do not show a full completion as foretold then yes it must G either about us or future. The only other viable option is that the details of events were left out or lost creating a situation were we can not G expected at this present time say it was fulfilled on "x" time...
  6. K

    Same Ol' Same Ol'?

    well said and outlined their sir.
  7. K

    What is your endtime view on Revelation 12:17

    still future, but roughly equated to the same- a power figure rising up and getting all to willfully join his task of attempting to annihilate all of that small portion of land Israel and its inhabitants holding fast to God and Jesus.
  8. K

    Jesus saves all but the son of perdition, how then is the beast of perdition saved?

    theoretically anything is possible I.e a tornado ripping through a junk yard and creating an airplane, is it probable is the problem. We can think that the "beast"/satan and the other fallen angels could get saved if they were to repent, though their is no scripture giving credence to any of it...
  9. K

    Misplaced, irrevelant, and erroneous attack.

    the real motive in my opinion is spiritual warfare some are blindly caught in- getting as many as possible to potentially give up hope and faith in their belief when things start happening that do not align with their views but are aligned exactly as the word of God has projected I.e. a...
  10. K

    Islamic State of the Muslim Caliphate

    Only God himself would get me to switch to that view, and I admit it most likely would not G while I'm in this current body. Preterism does not add up to what scripture plainly says without conflicting itself or having to do away with "plain" writings. Though while "futurists" have issues...
  11. K

    Is Nebuchadnezzar the Beast?

    nothing you have posted or said will override what scripture is saying of him choosing the Most High as the only true God and the reasons why Jews were not released to go back to Judah (home). And that would explain why you can disagree with scripture saying something relatively clear...
  12. K

    Is Nebuchadnezzar the Beast?

    though it appears your not properly understanding the various tie ins with prophecy and reprocessions that were associated with this particular exile. daniel 4:33 The same hour was the thing fulfilled upon Nebuchadnezzar: and he was driven from men, and did eat grass as oxen, and his body...
  13. K

    Matthew 24:14-15: What did Jesus mean?

    That depends on ones issue, while personally I don't always need proof to believe what I believe, proof helps in showing how it can G true and not just a desired interpretation. For those making a case such as the gospel "was" spread to all of the earth because this verse says this and supports...
  14. K

    Matthew 24:14-15: What did Jesus mean?

    I don't discredit anything God can do. with respect to the eunuch and Cornelius, they are documented for our teaching and understanding- their are very few "documents" of Christianity showing up in the Americas or about the Americas around the time of Paul's writing. So the possibility of a...
  15. K

    Matthew 24:14-15: What did Jesus mean?

    forgive me I really didn't word that as properly as I should have. We easily agree he wrote what God intended- Though did Paul understand that "all creation under heaven" was more than what he currently new (other countries/continents). The importance is wether or not it was "fulfilled" at that...
  16. K

    How to Properly Use Strong's Concordance...

    ya, and putting 3 pennies in a kids hand and taking away 1 while asking them how many are left is destructive to their ego as well huh? Instead of it having the potential to properly educate and inform them of basic normal math....I suppose that's where they learn to steal and claim things that...
  17. K

    New Jerusalem will never be on this earth

    you might want to heed your own assertion here. well if every translation is wrong then what authority do you have that makes your translation right? Are you a prophet - disciple- or apostle? Are you a teacher with divine insight? Let alone as why bother even using translations, lets just...
  18. K

    My boy was just like me, he'd grown up just like me...

    got to admit you have a knack of properly intertwining scripture and comedy.
  19. K

    New Jerusalem will never be on this earth

    such a bold and strong assertion their. though the idea of Jerusalem descending from heaven down to this planet currently known as earth is ironically seen in those exact verses your quoting from, which is not contradicting scripture. It clearly is in the understanding one chooses to lean...
  20. K

    Young earth, old universe

    Because your presuming growth/reproduction were already implemented before God gave them the command to do so. Presuming God had just got done either placing a full tree at point "x" and a shrub at point "v" He then gave it permission to grow- without that permission the tree would stay exactly...