Search results

  1. D

    Understanding Evolution

    Here is the description of his book on Amazon ' Several points I would like to see him establish. 1."Merely" the result of mutations and natural selection.-There is quite a bit more to it than that. 2. Genomes must in fact degenerate over time. -Can he support this? 3. Just the result of a...
  2. D

    Darwinism is a Pseudo-Science (3)

    Do you like conspiracy theories? You must as you use them quite a bit. If scientists could show the current Theory of Evolution wrong and be able to support that with evidence, all kinds of good things will happen including a possible Nobel Prize. Please note the idea of providing evidence...
  3. D

    Understanding Evolution

    How are we not subject to natural selection? Cite please or is this one of the several things you vaguely remember as reading or seeing somewhere and yet report as fact. Dizredux
  4. D

    Darwinism is a Pseudo-Science (3)

    And can you name a few who are practicing scientists in the field that agree with you? We await.
  5. D

    Let's devise a way to explain proof burden and claims vs non-claims to creationists

    AIG, ICR, ICR, Carl Baugh, Ken Hovind among the cast of a few. Dizredux
  6. D

    Darwinism is a Pseudo-Science (3)

    I guess you should inform the biologists, paleontologists and related fields as they seem to be blissfully unaware of this. Or Could it be, even as a remote possibility, that you could be wrong? Dizredux
  7. D

    Let's devise a way to explain proof burden and claims vs non-claims to creationists

    Dizredux Smidlee I'm sorry but I am not understanding what this has to do with what I posted. Could you expand on this a little? Dizredux
  8. D

    Understanding Evolution

    I never said it was a force. It is a process. Death is not the only factor in natural selection, there are others. Sometimes, for example, it is simply about who can successfully mate. Dizredux
  9. D

    Understanding Evolution

    I think you are confused about natural selection. It is not the selection of the strong over the weak, it is about the best adapted to the local environment resulting in more successful reproduction. Really, in many natural selection is better described as the selection of the slightly more...
  10. D

    Understanding Evolution

    I am trying to give him the benefit of the doubt but I am finding it harder and harder. Dizredux
  11. D

    Understanding Evolution

    The bird statement was a perfectly reasonable one looking at the issue from a cladistics view. That you could not understand what I was saying is not my issue but yours. Next, what evolution gaffe? I carefully explained to you that evolution has both random and non random elements and is not...
  12. D

    Understanding Evolution

    That is very good example of your reading comprehension issues. You have misunderstood about as badly as one can get. Dizredux
  13. D

    Darwinism is a Pseudo-Science (3)

    Could you back this up a little more showing how you arrived at this conclusion? What I have seen are references to articles on T.O. from scientific sources I trust. Dizredux
  14. D

    Let's devise a way to explain proof burden and claims vs non-claims to creationists

    "Boobs" as you so eloquently phrase it are present in all mammals. In primates mostly they do not protrude nor do they need to in order to get the job done. It it thought that they provide a sexual signal for being breeding age in female humans but the jury is still out on that as far as I...
  15. D

    Darwinism is a Pseudo-Science (3)

    Far from it. Did you check it out. I simply entered talk origins awards on Google and got this Talk Origins Archive Awards Page Far too much to post here so take a look. T.O., while beginning to be a little out of date is still one of the most respected sources for this kind of information there...
  16. D

    Video about creationist astronomy

    You actually watched it. More patience than I have. Dizredux
  17. D

    Understanding Evolution

    With multiple successive speciations. What happens (for the general reader) is that at some point the population will differ enough from the parent one that we will give it a different name. As an example, at one point feathered dinosaurs differed enough that we could call them something else...
  18. D

    Understanding Evolution

    Why on earth should anyone try to address something this, and I hate to say it, stupid. This is, as far as I know, the first and only time I have called an idea stupid on the forum but I can find no other description that fits. Dizredux
  19. D

    Rosetta establishes orbit

    Not always but very often this is accurate. It can, at times, be very exciting. Being shown wrong is not necessary a flaw but often a chance to learn new things. For myself, I love to be shown wrong as it usually give me a new direction from which to to explore and learn. Dizredux