Search results

"on or at or in, makes no difference" It certainly does make a difference .... a big difference The post tribulation view attempts to place the entire tribulation period and the resurrection on the last "day" at the ending of "those days" of the tribulation by quoting Matthew 24:29-31 So...

I think you talk in circles Interplanner Is the Lord a "futurist" ? or does He only deal in the past as you and your preterist friends tell Your attempt to draw a line between the OT and NT is an exercise in futility The Bible is just one book from Genesis to Revelation .... the same...

<edit> Good rebuttal to Manasseh I will post this again with some expansion ... the Lord's intent to immortalize His own before He brings His coming judgment is true with no doubt: Evidence of the Lord&#8217;s pre-tribulation keeping [1 Corinthians 15:20-58; 1Thessalonians 4:13-18...

Dr V is absolutely wrong about his story No scriptural support and much speculating .... the guy should not be followed

"I strongly disagree with you. The 2 witnesses will be servants of God! They confirm a testimony . I believe that they symbolize the saints and will prophecy Gods word . Wearing sackcloth in the bible represents repentance . I still think they may end up being Moses and Eliijah" Agreed, but I...

There is no reference to "on" the last day in the KJV scriptures .... but only "in", or "at" This is just one example where the post tribulation view fails by inserting "on" the last day .... there are many others Micah 4:1 But in the last days it shall come to pass, that the mountain of the...

The correct rendering is "in" or "at" the last day, not "on" the last day .... read your Bible where this term is used as you referr to it "On" the last day [one day] can be used to skew the meaning This presents a different application .... in which "day" can mean a "period of time" ...

Evidence of the Lord&#8217;s pre-tribulation keeping Those who dwell in heaven [state of immortality] during the coming judgment [His hour [time] of trial] Here is the clincher: Revelation 3:10; 4:4; 5:1-10; 7:9-17; 11:1; 13:6; 17:14; 19:1-9; 19:14 The same will appear and rule with the...

Still don't understsnd what you are getting at All of the Lord's word is true including the scriptures of his Bible prophets Chapter 10 is positioned during the Persian Empire and the Lord is revealing that there are fallen angels who take up rule over human kingdoms The prince of Persia is...

Don't let the Pope intimidate you 1d Are you paranoid? Ghastly pictures above, do you have more?

And Paul did not tell that his "absent from the body" statement was the same as the "gathering" in 2 Thessalonians 2:1 .... here he refers to the Lord's coming "harpazo" to immortalize His own It was and is the desire of all of those who follow Jesus Christ to be absent from the body and with...

It is still pending ... and this you are going to find out The scriptural view and description of His coming judgment at the end of this present age will make 70 AD look like kid's play 70 AD was nothing close to what is coming upon this intransigent world of unbelief Your scoffing at this...

Not sure what you are really trying to say I will tell you that none of Daniel's visionary prophecy is sealed for the understanding, but for the events which will take place at the time of the end The "sealing" means that the time appointed and related events are reserved will not take place...

My comment: I would suggest that those who doubt whether the "antichrist" will be a Middle Eastern figure to study the prophetic scriptures that confirm the location of this one's rising and relationship to the populations of the Middle East who are all today 90% Muslim Here are a few: Psalms...

Totally biased information above ... more of the preterist rant against correct the correct rendering of the prophetic scriptures .... all nothing but a hoax And Constantine fulfilled nothing recorded in the prophetic scriptures for the time of the end not to mention that the time of the end...

This entity will not be a "Jew" Doug You have no substantial scriptural support for this idea ... none The idea makes no sense whatsoever

The RCC is just a part of the professing church The Pope is not the little horn of Daniel's visions and certainly not Satan's beast of Revelation who once ruled over the ancient Middle East [Leopard, bear, Lion] [Revelation 13:1-4] .... Syrio/Babylonia,Persia,Babylon The Pope and his...

The USA is not referred to in the scriptures just above RT.... these scriptures are about national Israel's intransigent past and future restoration .... not the USA The USA is not named or mentioned in prophetic scripture The only possibility might be the "great city" part of MBG at the time...

Some people look in the wrong place There is no "Pope" in the prophetic scriptures The traditional teaching of the RCC is very apostate, but just another division of professing Christianity One will find the attributes of the Lord's church listed in Revelation 2; 3; .... He evaluates the...

Interpreter wants to use the excuse of "symbolism" in order to shut down a literal rendering of the scriptures .... this behavior is a cop-out All biblical symbols have literal interpretations either within the context of the passage given, or in other related scriptures Interpreter claims...