Search results

I don't waste my time proving something that is easily seen for all who look. The gesture is a denial complex, and it is not my responsibility to think for someone else. Let alone defend them, which you are doing. Which says a lot about where you stand as well. Don't get firm with me because I...

Tulc worships Obama. The poster asks for proof of even the most obvious of things about this alleged benevolent demigod. It's a bit disturbing, actually. Anyways, Obama pinning military officials between his agenda and the Constitution is national sacrilege. The reason it isn't brought up is...

..not wanting to preach So the divorce rate was the same? Don't labor under a delusion. Go downtown and look around the streets. Most homeless people are males. That's ridiculous. Women stayed at home to watch over the house and the children. It's called a role. Men fought- it is a role...

Divorce doesn't really exist. When a marriage is sanctified, it is "until death do us part". Until somebody dies, that bond is in stone. When the Church 'annuls' a marriage, it's because the marriage was on false grounds anyway, and therefore a marriage never actually took place. This is...

Obama recently gave military officials a litmus test to determine if they would shoot American citizens if they refused to be disarmed. The Second Amendment is part of the Constitution. Any attempt of a government official to undermine it is national sacrilege. And yet, Obama has given an...

Christianity itself is in danger in the UK. All people do over there is talk about how bigoted Christians are, even on public television. The populace are trying to push homosexual marriage, the episcopal branch of the Anglican communion has already enacted homosexual marriage, there are...

Well, where were all the inspiring female preachers before neo-feminism? Where were all the divorces before neo-feminism? Where were all the abortions before neo-feminism? And where are all the homeless females? And how many women were drafted in the World Wars? The problem is a lot bigger...

Why are you talking about what constitutes impeachment? No doubt, if an affair away from one's wife can threaten impeachment, I don't really care what you think constitutes it. It should be illegal treating a nation like a child and taking away their freedoms for punishment because others do bad...

And ignore the rest of the post, because that's what liberals do- ignore everything, pretending nothing is there except roses and butterflies :D Suppressing citizens is tyranny, not democracy. A president should not even have the authority to promote such a thing. If America turns into the UK...

Discredited The thing about religion is that if one doesn't want to believe otherwise, then the most substantial opposition is 'proving nothing'. Don't believe me? Try the threads :D

~Multiple definitions of heresy~ -adherence to a religious opinion contrary to church dogma -denial of a revealed truth by a baptized member of the Roman Catholic Church -an opinion or doctrine contrary to church dogma -dissent or deviation from a dominant theory, opinion, or practice...

But then they will try to say that you are simply interpreting from a trinitarian Bible. For example, you'll notice that LORD is put into all caps to connect Yahweh and the Christ, and often replaces words such as Elohim. You have to break down the metaphysics to them along with the biblical...

we defend the White House with guns we defend our Congress with guns we defend our celebrities with guns we defend our sporting events with guns we defend our jewelry stores with guns we defend our banks with guns we defend our courts with guns we defend our police officers with guns *and yet...

You refuse to see the true meaning of what Paul is saying. You want to say he is either hating women, or if not, the entirety of the teaching is just obsolete and should go ignored. You go against tradition- since when did tradition call for women trying to usurp mens' God given roles? Of all...

The primacy of Rome means that the Church is prime. And because of Jesus' promise that the gates of Hades cannot prevail against it and that he is the High Priest, there can be no error in doctrine, because it is all brought down from God. The Church is very archaic and dogmatic. That's just...

One cannot deny something that is virtually certain. In fact, Pope Benedict depicted evolution as just that- virtually certain. The Church has many hundreds of PhD theologians and scientists. They have all the man power needed to make an assessment, and that's what they did. Adam and Eve is a...

Common sense. I don't need proof to show the obvious. There is nothing else going on to have have the newly re-designated president giving military officials tests about their loyalty vs shooting citizens. Obama has openly declared war on free gun ownership. But with liberals, common sense is...

How exactly does somebody believe a modern day prophet anyway? It just has suspicion written all over it. Is it really worth it to gamble when Christianity is already sufficient enough? Because if that prophet is wrong, then their followers going to be judged on it when God gives the go, to say...

Free will and predestination co-exist. They are two sides of the same coin. I don't understand what the blatant refusal is for people who say it has to be either/or. Probably because it requires a little bit of critical thinking, and fanatics simply aren't too good at that.

This is how Paul justifies women remaining silent in church: 1 Timothy 2:13-14 For Adam was first formed; then Eve. And Adam was not seduced; but the woman being seduced, was in the transgression. He uses the natural law.The whole point of the story of Adam and Eve is to show mankind's fallen...