Search results

I'm gone for the weekend, :wave:see you guys Monday.

Because Jesus is what He is doesn't mean prophecy has been fulfilled.

God used the things of the earth in the plagues against Egypt so why wouldn't he use a naturally occuring geographical one? It just confirms Zech.14:4

The footnotes in my Bible say that a recent geological survey (c.1988) in the area has verified the presence of a prominent fault running east and west throught the southern section of the Mt. of Olives. Found a site that shows the fault lines of the Middle East. Third row down is one that...

What your missing is the point that Zech. 12-14 has to do with Israel being saved from its enemies by the person Jesus Christ and living in peace which to this day has never happened.

When they fled during the time "Jerusalem was encompassed by Armies" which I'm assuning your referring to 70AD, why history never says a thing about the light diminishing. . . (v.6,7)........And it shall come to pass in that day, that the light shall not be clear, nor dark: But it shall be one...

[/I] So what are you interpreting this to say? with means the Gentiles are not foes but are with the Lord? That's pushing it a bit since (v.5b) says the Lord shall come with all the saints. Are you trying to say that the Gentile nations are the Lords saints? :argh: OH PLEASE...

Behold the day of the Lord cometh, Zech.14:1 The phrase "in that day" occurs no less than sixteen times in the 12-14 chapters of Zech, signifying the Day of the Lord or as 14:1 says "the day of the Lord cometh", signifying the Day of the Lord, the future period when the Lord will publically...

In my OP I quoted Zech.14:2-4. If as you say that refers to the destruction of Jerusalem in first century, why wasn't such a dynamic event as the Mt. of Olives splitting in half and half going to the north and half going to the south creating a great valley between them ever recorded? Hm? :smirk:

My bad on this one, since I thought you were referring to . .2. . Second Comings. There are those that think there will be 2 making 3 comings of Jesus all together. All you have to do is read Zech.chapters 12-14 and you will see that God will do away with Israel's enemies and they will live...

From now on you need to quote what I asked which you didn't do and it makes it hard to follow what was asked in post #14. I don't know if you are aware of the fact that (Aleph) A designated Sinaiticus and B designated Vaticanus only represent ......1%........ of the exisitng manuscripts...

No, the Gospel event is the first coming.

You need to reply to what I posted.

I do agree with on one thing Jesus was crucified on the Mt. of Olives. Why wasn't such a great event as half of the Mt.of Olives going toward the north and half toward the south creating a great valley ever recorded? Zech.14:4 Hm?

25 what of Zech.? What was Metzger's underlying Greek text that he used? What? Chapter 20 of Zech? Have no idea what your point is. Please point out to me how you see two comings in Zech. Jesus does quote Zech.12:10 in Matt.26:31. It couldn't have been one event since Israel is...

It would be a good idea if you can show some sort of scripture proof as to why you think the NT says so much of Zech 12-14 is about the Gospel, and never bothers to say anything about the 2nd coming.

Hi Interp, The whole section that is escatalogical is chapters 12-14. The second coming is mentioned in 12:10 And I will pour upon the house od David, and upon the inhabitants of Jerusalem, the spirit of grace and supplications: and they shall look upon me whom they have pierced, and they...

I quoted Zech.14:2,3 which is a great eschatological section., which is backed up by Rev. And in the end even if a country doesn't have military that will not stop them from suffering from God's wrath.

Exactly what is the conflicting message about the subject of burnt offereings and animal sacrifices.

ROFL&L&L&L. Where did you come up with this junk?