Search results

The same has been said about the evidence for the resurrection of Jesus Christ. Why do you reject that evidence?

So in other words, you cannot claim it has been proven.

You can't disprove something that has never been proven.

Truth is not determined by majority vote.

Who says creation scientists don't submit for peer review?

What makes more sense, an intelligent creator was the cause for the creation or that everything created itself from nothing? Yours is not the reasonable, logical position. In fact, evolution requires much more faith than creationism.

I don't recall the history books recording the 1000 year reign of Christ. Which if it occurred as you say, would have ended roughly 1000 years ago. Why is there still sin, evil and death in the world. You may want to check out the last verse of revelations.

If you were take a computer program and randomly change a couple lines, are you going to add functions to the program or lose functions ?

Some of the things happening in our society and our world today only make sense when one realizes who the god of this world is. One of satan's greatest deceptions is to convince the world that he does not exist. http://www.gotquestions.org/Satan-god-world.html

Keep trying. When you recognize your own sinfulness before a just and holy God you will understand your need of God's pardon for the penalty of sin. Don't let your pride and the passing pleasures of sin seal your current legal standing. Eternity is a long time.

What is your understanding of why Jesus died on the cross? Come to a correct understanding of that reason and it will all make sense to you.

Gods love was proven on the cross.

Because of sin, such as lying, theft, adultery, murder, rape, etc. with all that is wrong in the world are you going to suggest that man is inherently good and therefore does not need rules? The facts don't bear that out.

AIG uses valid scientific sources and references their articles and yes, scientists are susceptible to bias, especially the bias of the ones funding their work, which in many cases is the government.

If evolution takes millions or billions of years how can it benefit scientists who don't live long enough to observe this change and are reduced to speculating over what might have happened.

Seriously, you can accept that nature can design itself, but not that an intelligent creator designed it, and evolutionist claim creationists throw out reason to believe what they do.

Are you suggesting you are without bias or your sources are without bias, an atheist coming into a Christian forum to debate about something which you don't believe exists, to what end?

Do you give commands and make rules for your kids? Why?

Did everything come from nothing? How did life come from non life? How did the first life develop the ability to reproduce itself in the fist generation? Explain away irreducible complexity?

The 10 commandments were given to convict us of sin and our need of a savior Galatians 3:21-25 (KJV) Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid:for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law. 22 But the scripture...