Search results

Plasma is mass. It's the fourth state of matter. Solid, liquid, gas, plasma. They're all made of matter. There is no such thing as 'plasma energy'.

Plasma is matter, not energy. Light is a form of energy described as an electromagnetic wave, it's not a separate thing from energy.

Wait, so I'm not supposed to use the equation in the way that it is actually used in science?! What is the fusion-fission reaction? I know what fission is, and I know what fusion is, but not fission-fusion.

The light emitted from the sun is a product of the fusion reaction. c is not radioactive as it is a number. I do not understand the rest of the woo you posted. Do you admit yet you were wrong when you misquoted Einstein and tried to make it about the ego?

The c in the equation is not light. It is the speed of light squared. A mathematical constant. A number. Please stop saying that things are made of light when they clearly aren't and is not at all what Einstein meant. Please go and read some very basic science books.

What does it matter if there's a correlation?

They've been selectively bred by humans (intelligently designed if you like) and are very very different to what they were like in the wild. In fact, they can't survive without human cultivation, I believe.

and a quote by this one guy should be taken over the opinion of climate experts because...?

Expecting people to sit down and watch a video over half an hour long without any information or arguments from you is pretty unreasonable. Present the arguments you think are compelling and then there can be a discussion. You can also point out exact points in the video where those arguments...

It's like everyone believing the earth was flat until people actually studied it and decided to be creative and come up with a different version of the shape of the earth. Why would modern scholars, people who actually study literature, make it up?

You see? People here are genuinely willing to help people understand science and use evidence. As long as people have an actual desire to learn about what reality actually is I have no problem explaining anything.

Owning another human being, which the bible condones, is immoral.

Cool story, but that's all that can be said about it. NDEs cannot be used as evidence as of anything.

What about all the disgusting and horrific things in nature?

I don't want this to turn into apologetics, but 'accept this all completely on faith or be punished for all eternity no matter how good you are' is a threat.

What did I say that was wrong? I was merely following the 'logic' of your comments. If scientists are trying to 'sterilise' the bible (and apparently no other religious texts) surely those who are from different religious or non-religious backgrounds must be doing science honestly without any...

Out of interest, where is that list from?

I wondered how long it would take before the threats started appearing.

The post you originally responded to was specifically about science......

It isn't just Christians who pray. Investigating claims is part of what science does, but the rest of the time science focuses on what can actually be observed in reality. How convenient. As you say, they have no interest towards the Bible, so those scientists are, in your view, being...