Search results

Oh you can do that. You'll just actually face consequences. Become a cop to reduce that chance to like 10%. Gotta be smart about it :oldthumbsup:

I'm in agreement, but the problem is that the people you're arguing against see it as either murder or not murder. You cant half-a-murder somebody so compromise is still a loss to them. I don't know how you combat that.

Childhood Firearm Injuries in the United States The rest of the study is interesting and worth looking at.

Funny, a child finding a gun poorly hidden by the parents and playing with it and ending up shooting themselves is now defined as a criminal intending to kill someone. Fascinating.

Because for some conservatives, finding out basic facts of reality is groundbreaking when the rest of us take it for granted. Kind of like learning that taxes aren't just as simple as X% of Y; or knowing what the word satire is, let alone telling the difference. We should be applauding at...

Good to see all the outrage about "activist judges" a few months ago by conservatives was just fake news. It's A-OK for the federal Supreme Court when its "your guys." Really glad that conservatives have stopped pretending like they cared about values and principles. They're more honest than...

Last time we tried talking about the topic (something about 70% taxes) you up and left, then closed it down. How do we know this will be different?

It doubled because it didn't triple. Which line is better? 10+2+2+2+3+3+4+4 or 10+2+2+2+2+2+2+2

Are we pretending qualifications and experience matter now? If anything, his lack of experience should gain a huge swath of votes if last election taught us anything.

I've been told that CNN is fake news, therefore the above article shows we're #winning and the stock's are going up. Thank you Trump!

To quote : Does OP have a better understanding of what a 70% tax actually looks like?

Oh you mean the outrageous and unnecessary hospital the other poster mentioned? Gee, what a surprise. Almost as if just getting a midwife is a totally useless solution to fixing healthcare relating to childbirth.

Of course it wasn't forseen, hence the word EMERGENCY. You know, something that isn't planned. Must be nice never having experienced one. A C-section costs more than 30k? Gee golly willikers thanks for that info. You must have seen our bills and thought I was too dumb to read them. If only we...

Is this satire? I'm having difficulty telling the difference. I have a hunch you'd understand my trouble here. Either way, add this to your list of troubles understanding tax code. Try reading the whole paragraph again, slowly. Mind the commas.

(1)Committee on Ways and Means, Committee on Finance, and Joint Committee on Taxation Upon written request from the chairman of the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives, the chairman of the Committee on Finance of the Senate, or the chairman of the Joint Committee on...

In before being closed at OP's request. Very informative thread. Sadly, probably more informative for me than some posters who actually need to learn about taxes.

Obviously it wasn't a known risk. So off to the hospital we went. Oh, the hospital with the outrageous and unwarranted costs? Gee, thanks. Now we're stuck with the 30k+ you just brushed off so easily. Heck of a solution there chief.

How does a midwife handle pre-eclampsia leading into eclampsia thus requiring an emergency C-section? I'd like to know to avoid that for our 2nd child.

Oh man that one sounds good. Any chance for a link?

I vote the 70% tax thread. The complete lack of basic research is astounding.