Search results

  1. R

    Darwinian Sects, Lies and Evolutionists

    Nick, as usual, you hit the nail on the head. I don't have time to hang out here, but the duplicity of the evolutionists is astonishing. It real;ly is incredible the number of hoaxes, overstatements, lies, and errors they continually foist upon society. The more see what they write, the...
  2. R

    Evolution is a crock

    Great post Nick. Get some work done in your "real" life, and don't worry about t hese guys' absurd accusations.
  3. R

    How to discuss Creationism - EFFECTIVELY

    Seebs, I have to get some sleep, but I am very interested as to why you believe in God, and I think it has relevance to your criticisms of Patty's logic.
  4. R

    How to discuss Creationism - EFFECTIVELY

    Seebs is a Christian? OK, seebs, tell us why you believe in God, if you don't mind.
  5. R

    How to discuss Creationism - EFFECTIVELY

    Patty, Generally, evolutionists tend to believe it is perfectly reasonable to think life spontaneously generated, but irrational to believe God did it. They can't agree on basic concepts of logic, but keep trying. Maybe one or 2 will rethink their illogic.
  6. R

    How to discuss Creationism - EFFECTIVELY

    Patty, You are right of course, but don't expect these guys to be impressed. When someone doesn't want to believe, they will insist your point isn't valid, but keep preaching. Someone will keep reminding them you are right.
  7. R

    Spineless evolutionists smoking stinkweed

    Well, it needs to be understood that the evolutionist idea of what is a transitional forms means nothing, and provesd nothing except that it is possible for evolutionists to imagine different ways that extinct species could have evolved. It certainly does nothing to actually show the...
  8. R

    Spineless evolutionists smoking stinkweed

    How about the fact that a single species using the layman's definition of ability to interbreed can show such a wide variance? That suggests to me a serious problem in calling some of these fossils different species, even if separated by millions of years. LFOD, the horse...
  9. R

    The Bible supports Science

    "Sounds to me like a ringing endorsement in favor of studying the material world in order to understand the true nature of God." Please note the idea of God in your statement. Nature is to be looked at for theological insight.
  10. R

    Spineless evolutionists smoking stinkweed

    Thanks for posting the pics. My contention is that in the case of the differences between genera that can interbreed, there may be no mutations at all, but just selective breeding of an original species that has created the variation. Furthermore, that since evolutionists argue...
  11. R

    creationsts drinking Kool-Aid

    Lewis, we already covered this before. The Bible was written in Hebrew. "Bats" are indeed a kind of "bird" in the Hebrew. As far as chewing the cud, go look it up and debate with yourself. Noone claims there cannot be small, insignificant translation errors.
  12. R

    String Theory

    No, string theory predicts exactly what should be observed by our mathematical constructs if there were other dimensions. The other dimensions intersecting would indeed appear to be very small like a plane intersecting with a straight line, but that does not mean within the dimension itself that...
  13. R

    Spineless evolutionists smoking stinkweed

    "Many authorities, including Rice (1977), have referred all Tursiops to the single species T. truncatus. Hall (1981) used the name T. nesarnack in place of T. truncatus and treated T. aduncus as a subspecies thereof. Zhou and Qian (1985) reported the presence of both T. truncatus and T. aduncus...
  14. R

    Spineless evolutionists smoking stinkweed

    "Rice (1984) divided the Delphinidae into five subfamilies: Stenoninae, with the genera Steno, Sousa, and Sotalia; Delphininae, with Tursiops, Stenella, Delphinus, Lagenodelphis, Lagenorhynchus, and Grampus; Globicephalinae, with Peponocephala, Feresa, Pseudorca, Globicephala, Orcinus, and...
  15. R

    Spineless evolutionists smoking stinkweed

    Well, that was my point all along, even in the thread prior to this. However, I would point out that from a creationist perspective, these are the same kind regardless of how you choose to classify "species."
  16. R

    String Theory

    Um, why don't youn address the specifics of what I posted, show you actually grasp the ideas, and then try to put them down. Right now, there is no way to tell what in the world you are talking about. How do I contradict string theory? I've addressed the issue of smallness, and I...
  17. R

    Spineless evolutionists smoking stinkweed

    Actually Jerry, the dolphin has twice the number of teeth (88) as the pseudo-orca (44), and the offspring has exactly 66. I included some technical references last time, but seem to have removed it from my bookmark. Shouldn't be too hard to find though. Where I am going is...
  18. R

    Spineless evolutionists smoking stinkweed

    Jerry, there are huge differences between pseudo-orcas and dolphins, hard differences such as nearly twice the number of teeth, if I remember correctly, and huge differences in size and bone structure, none of which is shown in the cute illustrations LFOD posted. These bone...
  19. R

    String Theory

    Morat, I can't help it if your IQ does not permit you to grasp higher concepts. I suggest you reread the entire thread, and sit down, and just think about it a little. You obviously have no diea what is being discussed here. Let me give you an example. In a 3-dimensional world, a...
  20. R

    String Theory

    Math still is based on observations of our 3 dimensions.