Search results

You say that because you are unlearned in Bible and are not a 'true' Bible student. See Post No. 241 for the background, in English, which proves that Satan impregnated the woman in the Garden. Perhaps, you have never read Gen. 6, where the fallen angels impregnated the females of the Adamic...

What I am saying is that, by your own mode of measurement, you are an IDIOT! Eventhough there are some translational errors in the KJV, there is sufficient information therein, as I outlined for you, to prove that Satan has offspring. The FACT that Gen. 3:14-15 speaks of offspring gives the...

Strawman argument! You asked for it in English and you received it. Instead of acknowledging your error and admitting your idiocy, you raise a pathetically weak and unlearned argument regarding your selective understanding of historical study. Have you ever considered that it is the offspring...

LOL -- you are truly unlearned! You believe in 'magic fruit trees'...LOL!!! When did Adam first have sex with the woman?? Well, scripture clearly indicates it in Gen. 4:1. Have you ever read it?? Gen 4:1 And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a...

You prove you are a phony! [One should always suspect the disingenousness of a person that posts under multiple handles.] PM always teaches that the seals are not in chronological order. And, he teaches that the rider of Rev. 6:2 is Satan, which is the 6th seal chronologically.

Well, you are a pathetically poor student. Since you asked that question, it proves that you have not been paying attention. You are clueless! Since PM accurately teaches 6,6,6, of course he never teaches that Satan is on the scene prior to the first vial. And, he has never taught that the...

O.K. -- if that is the case, name one teaching that is false and why.

You should know -- you claim to know AM's teachings better than I do. Neither you or Zadok7000 want to acknowledge your gross error. The key to understanding 666 is "COUNT". If one counts, there are only two possibilities. One is counting 665 prior things/events or 3 separate 5 prior...

If he is, then you certainly would not be the one to prove it. No one here, except me, has yet demonstrated a single teaching of AM that is false.

If 666 is not an allegory for 6,6,6, then provide the 665 things that I am to count prior to Satan's appearnce!! You, like everyone else who maintains your [false] belief regarding 666, are completely dumbfounded in proving your position. How is it reasonable for God to have an endtime...

It is not my premise either -- it is exactly what the Bible states! Can't you read?? Rev 13:18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six. And, as usual, you are in complete...

If you think that it does not, then inform me what 665 things I am to count prior to Satan's arrival on the scene.

See Rev. 13:18. Satan arrives on the scene at the 6th vial.

I don't know how you got that idea. I have explained it well. See previous post. You are confusing God's overall judgment with the judgment on those who take the mark of the beast. God gives the spirit of delusion only for the specific purpose that I previously identified. God does not...

I have already acknowledged that it is the first, and most important, commandment that is being violated. In accepting a belief that would lead to the worship of Satan, those violators, since the time when God gave the commandments, took the mark of the beast. Even without worshipping Satan...

You are entitled to be wrong and to live in ignorance. If you read what I wrote, I said "direct correlation". You just spouted off a bunch of 'indirect correlations'. The mark of the beast is not literal/physical because it can be taken at anytime. See Eze. 13, Isa. 28, and 2 Thes. 2...

Whatever handle you choose to use still leaves you in the same unbiblical position. The purpose of Satan's tribulation is to test Christians and seal their fate relative to the first resurrection; and, for many, it will send them to the Lake of Fire. The first four vials are intended to get...

Well, you can present whatever you think that I ought to be counting -- it matters not an iota to me.

The current issues being discussed are the mark of the beast and 666. Surely, the mark of the beast can be construed to be violative of the first commandment. However, I do not see any direct correlation to the other nine commandments. One can glean understanding from Eze. 13, Isa. 28, and 2...