Search results

  1. M

    Noah's Flood was 23 ft (Gen 7:20)

    Hi Jazer, The glacial hills, such as moraines and drumlins, could never hold back the glacial meltwaters. Glacial till is too permiable, which has an accelerating effect upon erosion. In a matter of days, rills would turn into escape channels for an ever increasing volume of stream...
  2. M

    Scientific Bias

    "Velikovsky's theories about the universe (of which Wal's theories are based upon) couldn't be made to work without ignoring reality, because the observable behaviour of the planets does not correspond to the predictions of his models. They don't come anywhere even close to explaining things...
  3. M

    Astronomers say they've glimpsed the earliest galaxy yet

    Interestingly, when the solar spectra is analyzed, there is a very low concentration of heavy metals. This conforms perfectly with the nucleosynthesis model, or heavy metals are formed in the core of massive stars. Early galaxies would contain stars with very few heavy metals. After a series of...
  4. M

    How did Noah breath?

    Sandwiches has a good point AV1611VET.
  5. M

    Noah's Flood was 23 ft (Gen 7:20)

    ...and your point?
  6. M

    Noah's Flood was 23 ft (Gen 7:20)

    Greetings all, Most people do not realize it, but the Bible mentions how deep Noah’s floodwaters were. Genesis 7:20 states: -“Fifteen cubits upward did the waters prevail;” (KJV) Since one cubit is roughly equivalent to eighteen inches, fifteen cubits is equivalent to...
  7. M

    How did Noah breath?

    Well, Noah could breathe quite well because the biblical/physical evidence conforms to a local riverine flood of the Tigris and Euphrates (check out the Assyria Paradox thread). "...and the mountains were covered" is actually an English translation. In ancient Hebrew it could easily have been...
  8. M

    Darwinian Naturalistic Assumptions and Homology Arguments

    So, I have a question. Is this an honest statement? My perception of your logic based upon your post is that you dogmatically believe one particular interpretation of Genesis and reject any scientific evidence that contradicts this. Again, would this evidence cause you to honestly take fossil...
  9. M

    Henry Morris' Deception

    Ultimately, my point is that the science behind young earth creationism finds its origins from a young teenager in the mid-1800s promoting Seventh Day Adventist theology. It's a credibility issue. Remember, young earth creationism is merely one of many interpretations of Genesis. The only...
  10. M

    Henry Morris' Deception

    Greetings, The central foundation behind the “science” of creation science is a specific kind of flood geology where all of the layered sedimentary rocks around the world are remnant global flood deposits. All of today’s young earth creationists hinge their entire arguments in the...
  11. M

    The Assyria Paradox

    So, let me see if I undersand this. You accept the scientific discovery of Pangaea, which was the result of geological/paleontological data, but you reject the scientific discovery that Pangaea was the product of the collisions by major separate landmasses. A little bit of cafeteria science...
  12. M

    The Assyria Paradox

    Hi AV1611VET, Well, the geologic record actually shows three ancient Pangaea-like events of continental collisions and Panaea was only the latest. Panaea is actually considered a relatively recent geologic event, not the first. ...and if you read what I wrote, these rivers now flowing ARE the...
  13. M

    The Assyria Paradox

    Hi AV1611VET, Please read my first post. The biblical reality is that a global flood is biblically and physically impossible. The two great rivers (as per the Bible) are sitting on top of 6,000 feet of supposed global flood sediment (as per nature). A global flood would have destroyed them...
  14. M

    The Assyria Paradox

    Hi Poe, Thanks. I've heard of this thing called trolling. Is that part of it? Mike
  15. M

    The Assyria Paradox

    Hi AV1611VET, Even the most literal interpretation of the Bible requires metaphor (e.g., the four courners of the Earth, stars falling in the sky). I have no issues with taking a literal stance, only when it conflicts with reality. Sound is not only limited to short distances, it is also...
  16. M

    The Assyria Paradox

    Hi Waggoner, There certainly is. Do I use the Bible to prove anything about my faith? No. I'll explain more later. Sincerely, Mike
  17. M

    The Assyria Paradox

    Hello, My name is Michael Hawley and although I am a recent participant in the online forums, I have been researching the evolution/creation controversy since 1976. One such issue I have written about is how the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers has created a serious problem for proponents of a...