Search results

  1. J

    Intelligent Design: The Christian Right's Latest Attack on the Science Classroom

    JM: ID is fruitless. Suppose that the blood-clotting cascade is declared 'irreducibly complex' and 'intelligently designed'? So what? How does that information help the hemophiliac? One of the hallmarks of science is that the answers to questions will bear some fruit. For example, our...
  2. J

    An earth older then 10,000 years a simple proof challenge - for 50 blessings

    JM: C-14 does not really provide evidence for an old earth. It can provide evidence that certain carbon-bearing flora/fauna date back before the typical 6000-10000 year time frame given by ye-creationists, but it really does not tell us much about the age of the earth. Cheers Joe Meert
  3. J

    An earth older then 10,000 years a simple proof challenge - for 50 blessings

    JM: C-14 does not really provide evidence for an old earth. It can provide evidence that certain carbon-bearing flora/fauna date back before the typical 6000-10000 year time frame given by ye-creationists, but it really does not tell us much about the age of the earth. Cheers Joe Meert
  4. J

    NPR Hosts Live Debate on Intelligent Design vs. Darwinism

    JM: Non-sequiter. I believe in God and understand that evolution is how creation took place on earth. You make the very fundamental mistake of misrepresenting Christian faith AND evolution. How bizarre. Cheers Joe Meert
  5. J

    NPR Hosts Live Debate on Intelligent Design vs. Darwinism

    JM: That's exactly what it is, a game. It's not science and even Paul Nelson has acknowledged that ID is not science, so I don't see what they would be debating. Perhaps this: PN: ID is interesting. Mod: Yes it is. What is the science behind ID? PN: Who said ID is science, not me...
  6. J

    NPR Hosts Live Debate on Intelligent Design vs. Darwinism

    JM: That's really too bad because it gives false credence to ID. What's most interesting about the debate is that Paul Nelson is a young earth creationist. I hope he's asked a question about that. Cheers Joe Meert
  7. J

    OT: Do creationists proactively seek dialogue with learned people?

    JM: But that's a very silly misuse of scripture. As a Christian, you are required to spread the word and that may lead to some controversy and confrontation. In the case of YEC'ism it is also self-defeating because YEC'ists cannot lobby silently and expect to move science into their camp...
  8. J

    Literal flood: theologically unsound?

    JM: If I am where you are, there I shall find my hell. Cheers Joe Meert
  9. J

    Literal flood: theologically unsound?

    JM: Lol, I simply said that wherever I spend eternity, I hope it's not with you. Cheers Joe Meert
  10. J

    Literal flood: theologically unsound?

    JM: I would have to say that I want to spend my eternity anywhere other than where you hang out. Cheers Joe Meert
  11. J

    Literal flood: theologically unsound?

    JM: HAve you been to the regions affected by the tsunami? I've been to the coastal areas of East Africa, Sri Lanka and India. Trust me, the people who were killed by the tsunami were by and large very, very poor. Cheers Joe Meert
  12. J

    Literal flood: theologically unsound?

    JM: It's pretty much pure evil that goes on there in Indonesia, Sri Lanka, Indian and the east African coast. People struggle to find food and shelter. Many are so poor they don't have shoes or clothes. Pretty much your standard devils. God was good to wipe them out in the tsunami just as he...
  13. J

    Dating standards in YEC

    JM: Yes, the topic is the subject of my dissertation. I studied under one of, if not the top, man in the field of paleomagnetism. I think it's fair to say that I know the subject far better than either Walt Brown or Humphreys. That's not meant to be a putdown because both of those people have...
  14. J

    Scientific proof of flood.

    [size=2]JM: I suggest you review the concepts of passive and active rifting. JM: Convection does not require 'an escape', it requires temperature differences sufficient to move the material along a gradient. JM: Name two scientists who think convection cells are mysterious. Cheers Joe...
  15. J

    Dating standards in YEC

    JM: If that is indeed what you are doing, might I suggest another tact? Begin by reading about the fundamental science behind the ideas and see if it matches up with what creationists are telling you. Present the material in a manner that shows you want to learn. For example, "Brown stated the...
  16. J

    Dating standards in YEC

    JM: I'm glad to help, but I am also curious. If you don't have a grasp on the most basic fundamentals of the field, why spout off on it as if you do? There is nothing wrong with not knowing something. Basalts record the ambient field at the time they erupt. Unless someone is standing next to...
  17. J

    Paul's question list (ie Walt Brown's question list)

    JM: No, that is an incorrect description of BB cosmology. At the instant of the Big Bang and for some time after, there were no 'pieces'. The Big Bang was an energetic expansion. Matter and presumably anti-matter formed out of the plasma as quarks began to unite to form the atomic particles...
  18. J

    Is talkorigins unreliable?

    JM: Well, deception by omission applies to True Origins. They did not present a fair and balanced discussion of a debate offer with Walt Brown, for example. Cheers Joe Meert
  19. J

    Creationist Diner Poisons Kids' Minds

    JM: Creationists call this peer-review. Cheers Joe Meert
  20. J

    Scientific proof of flood.

    JM: I nominate Hugh Ross as the Ph.D. physicist. Cheers Joe Meert