Search results

Its true. They dont have "the personal Jesus" egging them on

"inappropriate content is not the problem, its the symptom" abuse is not the problem, its the symptom crime (pick one) is not the problem, its the symptom try and follow along, its logic. "sin is the problem" is trite, cute, handy, convenient. Whats funny is, divorce in the cases we are talking about IS...

nope you are not reading

hotel

divorce, and easy too cake, and eat it too

Goodness The law is not ro protect the man. But its telling its seen that way. The law is to protect the one that doesnt want the divorce. Which, well, happens to be the man. Mainly because he wants to be able to behave badly, and force his wife to stick it out. Oh.....yea, back to the...

I would if there was one, there is no law. Didnt say there was

See thats the thing, I would have too, when I had my divorce 23 yrs ago....its a matter of, this situation is bad enough, im willing to live elsewhere and have a visitation schedule for a short time to get rid of the jerk. It shows that you REALLY have the strength of conviction about it...

OK good. But there are lots who do have a problem with it. They want zero from the one wanting the unilateral divorce short of greased skids, facilitation, oh and moral approval and encouragement

read my proposal. Its a sacrifice, it means she has to move out if she files, and live out for 60 days, and she gets to be the one "visiting" the kids (which is what he will be doing after the thing is final). No money changes hands, no long term anything. Just the filer moves out and is visitor...

Am I that unclear? I must be very bad at explaining myself My post has nothing to do with what the waiting period is. Texas has 60 days I think, maybe 90. My point though has zero to do with that. I'm saying that WHATEVER the period is, the filer move out and is a visitation for the kids...

sleep on the floor, then tuck the blankets under the bed

As for getting involved in social engineering through legislation to try and compel people to stay in marriage due to financial or some other type of hardship - I really have a problem with that. I get what you're trying to accomplish - but that's a realm I do not believe the state ought to...

Yes....it was...initially THEN there were posts taken there...i did it I ought to know The very first time over there was about Fireproof, that was "from innocuous ping backs". You do not know what you are talking about, until you do, you should drop it LET THERE BE NO CONFUSION, I PUT POSTS...

Just please stop....the hyperbole is silly Do us all a favor, cut and paste ALL of EVERY post ever made over there, it will save time....or, just post mine, that's OK too. Also, while you are at it, link up the blogs owners post that "trashes women" please....or, stop. Put up.....shut up. If...

your point?

The thing folks forget is that unless they are cheating in homosexual relationships, there is a man and woman involved in every one of them. The single women sleeping with the married man is not any more moral than the man. The question as to who cheats more is a bit useless. But, the numbers...

I knew a guy who had an affair

Uh...thats was me who wrote that In the mode of pointing out, and continuing to point out the absurdity of these claims.....no one said "he just found it"...so, its good you are not buying it because its a hallucination Its called Ping Back I just posted a link from Stephen Baskervilles blog...

Ugly, OTOH, can spoil the pretty beach hence I keep myself dressed