Search results

^_^^_^^_^^_^^_^^_^, thanks for the laugh, tears are actually streaming down my face from laughter and my gut hurts right now^_^^_^^_^^_^^_^^_^^_^

Its an uneducated guess but I would say the skull you posted is one of an extinct species of Tiger where as the skull in the picture with the Tiger is a skull of the same species of Tiger that live now-a-days that died approximately 80 million years ago.

I know it is from a Christian site but I do believe the quotes are from those who may not be Christians and are experts in their feild and are actual results of their anyalsis of "Lucy's" bones and data. The write up can be found here. You state that her bipedalism was determined by her pelvic...

Thank you troodon, I do have to admit, I am learning somethings in here. But I still stand by the "why" we are here is more important than the "how".

There is also another possibility for this and it seems every thread in here eventually leads to this. A global flood. Actually didn't Harun have some of those fossils you shouldn't find where they found them?

Thats no where near the point I was trying to make. And yes, "decay " was not the proper word to use.

So you beleve that it is only the professional creationists that are lying, if they are? All have sinned by the way, and fallen short of the glory of God. If a person interprets a matter differently than another then is one lying? Let me give an example. I will take the "tiktaalik". I am not...

Originally Posted by Meshach But according to what you consider truth none of these people should be listened to. You are right, this should have been a question. Sorry about that. It is however the conclusions that are drawn, the differences in interpretation of fossils found where the...

So you are unable to prove that ANY of the fossils on Harun Yahya site are actually legitimate or not, as to there age or authenticity? I already confessed I was unable to and thought it ironic how he just slaps dates on them. (sounds familiar doesn't it) It often makes a difference when...

I staretd it on page one again, go through them all, this is more insects, plants and marine life in these. Which ones are hoaxes? Which dates are forged? Is it all biased information? Once agian I find it ironic.

A good question to ask for any fossil unearthed. Where you there when they dug it up?

I started it on page one of all the fossils posted. When you get to the bottom of each page click to the next page and so on until you have seen them all. Then tell me which ones are frauds or hoaxes and which ones are legitimate. Funny though it seems he just slaps a year on all of them...

I totaly understand why you would not accept ANY of his finds.:)

Would Harun Yahya be considered an acceptable source. He touches on some interesting topics regardless of his faith. more frauds maybe?

And what source would you consider acceptable? You could do a search and find it easily.

If it is contrary to what evolutionists believe then of course its an invalid argument.

Somethings never change. This fossil tiger skull shows that tigers have been exactly the same for the last 80 million years, without undergoing any alterations.

If you say so. You can accept any opinion you want. Your choice. This YouTube video contains numerous fossils I hear that are all fabricated, frauds. Can you prove otherwise? OH yah, there is a 160 million year old fossil found in China of a spider that is the same today as it was then. Most...

My point was: What were these two fossils (amongst many others) heralded as before the truth came out? And if you are not actually there in person to see these fossils dug up: How do you know they are legitimate? Faith?

It is a quote from the book below, I would not waste my money and buy it, but you might. I have seen this exact quote in many places so I assumed it was directly from this book word for word. But yah, if I have not seen it for myself from the actual source maybe I should not of used it. Sorry...