Search results

The Bible does make that claim and, as far as I know, it remains unsubstantiated.

If you could provide data supporting this statement, that'd be great.

You asked this question before and I believe it was ignored. I'm curious too.

Interpreting the evidence while suffering from cognitive dissonance will effect your conclusions. The designer is biological evolution through selection pressures.

1. Unrelated to evolution... 2. Fossil record out of order. Features that could not have developed through gradual change. Lack of genetic variation in organisms. A biological function that stopped the adaption process before the species changed so much genetically that it could be considered...

404. I've seen numerous Comfort interviews. His strengths are straw man arguments, preaching, and wasting people's time.

Thank you for that awesome word.

We should have called dibbs.

Natural selection is the designer. ;) IC has been debunked for years now. Really?

It sounds like you've never attempted to learn any of this stuff. Your use of the term "evolutionist" in addition to the arguments you've put forward leads me to believe that you're just promoting creationism. I suggest doing some research to indulge your curiosity. lol @ your claims

You stated you're currently working as a scientist, correct? Your own position requires nothing but faith, so it's a bit odd that you're using it as an argument against naturalism and evolution. I disagree, of course, as the natural world and evolution are both subject to the scientific...

It's easy to become pessimistic about being drawn into debates when your time and energy seems to have no effect, when long and descriptive replies with sources and images are waved away as godless conspiracies. I suppose I understand why--they're defending a religious belief grounded in a...

This thread has taught me just how powerful religious presupposition is and how fruitless our efforts to remedy the situation are (or seem to be).

Its explanatory power coupled with its simplicity.

Because there's an alternative to assuming something came about in a natural way. trollface.jpg

I don't think you read the definition.

Creationists. Easy. While the rest of the world has learned the lesson and moved on, they're unable to.

Is it possible that they manipulated the data to support their conclusions and ruined their reputation? Science is made up of many different individuals. Have they all agreed to silence any opposition to evolution? What other theories are they protecting? Maybe science is a secret society...

Don't forget the "global" flood, people living for over 900 years, angels having sexual congress with mortal women, giants, talking snakes, and the Jews being liberated from Egyptian slavery.

Why did the Fall affect certain animals and their diets?