Search results

So where are the professors who have tenure who don't have to fear loosing their jobs who doubt evolution.  How about those about to retire?  Who have retired? Or how about those who are smart enough to realize that recognized scientist could make a lot of money by writing a...

That is a major treasure trove of information.  It tells us for the first time why the charges against Hovind were dropped.  But the big news is that an elder of CSE is a life-long felon and is currently a fugative. To verify this go the following two sites...

Of the creationists will not be able to properly back up the claim that fossils are being intentionally ignored.  But lets take this at face value: 250 types of animals / 20 proposed trees Now if there were only twenty types of animals there would be 8,200,794,532,637,891,559,375...

Stephen W. Hawking is the three-hundredth Steve.

Apolipoprotein AI Mutations and Information is a great new reasource.  It documents a clear case of a beneficial mutation in human populations.  It also debunks claims by Answers in Genesis that mutation is a loss of information and AiG's suggestion that the mutation is lethal when...

This poll is very telling. Very few creationists have read anything on evolution. Of course their posts make that obvious as well.

You might want to find a copy of Ronald Numbers The Creationists which covers the history of creationism in detail.  It has excellent reviews from mainstream science sources as well as creationist sources. Morris and Whitcomb were heavily influenced by a prior YEC/Flood "geologist" by...

Still no creationist willing to address this transitional form?

I will refer people to the Talk.Origins page on thermodynamics which links to several FAQs as well as to creationist pages and other pages of interest.

I guess that you don't know that tail is an ancient euphemism for a certain male sexual organ.  I am not sure if we are allowed to say it here, but it should be obvious it is the one that starts with a 'p'. In case you think that evolutionists just made it up... John Gill (1697-1771)...

Still no YEC willing to take on unconformities. So far nothing much more a can we change the subject. It is very telling.

One common choice for that reference point is the 2.73 K blackbody radiation -- the Cosmic Microwave Background. The Milky Way is moving with repect to it.  Indeed the images shown in the press for COBE and WMAP satellite results have had this effect corrected.  This I guess...

The claim that creationist is making is outright false.

  The Hutton Unconformity looks the same two hundred years later and the implications for YECism are still the same.   And it is far from the only example I gave. Unconformities disprove YECism.

Funny how young-earth creationists on these discussion forums never actually bother to check to see if their favorite argument has been addressed.  The Po holos arguments have been long discredited.  See this detailed examination and the T.O. page on the subject. And funny how YECs...

  Here is a photo of the Hutton Unconformity from message one: Here is an angular unformity from Texas:  

It has not been falsified to my knowledge.  But then again it really does not have any evidence for it either.  

Actually it has nothing to do with radioactive decay.  Atoms do other things besides decay.  The second is defined in terms of how long it takes an atom of Cs-133 in its ground state to oscillate 9,192,631,770 times.  Cs-133 is stable.  It is not observed to undergo...

Anyone who has used GPS equipment has tested time dilation caused by the gravitational field.  The GPS system has to correct for the effects of general relativity.   

No YEC wants to comment? Maybe they are conceding that the Earth is far older than a few thousand years old. :-) After all unconformities are such an obvious disproof of their "geology."