Search results

There is no "will" in the original Hebrew of Daniel 7:17. The first king had already arisen. He was Nebuchadnezzar.

Who is jwb? Recognition of the apostate papacy as the prevailing antichrist of their era, against whom God had empowered them for spiritual battle, was a foundation doctrine of the Reformers and the Reformation. Had the Reformation failed, where do you think you would be today? Hint: Not on...

The early Protestant Church repudiated all futurism, including that of Justin Martyr et al, because the Reformers recognized that "the future was now" in the fulfillment of antichrist by the apostate Catholic papacy. Or, to be specific, the Reformers recognized that the futurism espoused by...

The early Protestant Church repudiated futurism. Are you a Catholic?

The fact is that futurist Larkin acknowledged that futurism was spawned in apostasy. He said nothing about premil.

By the time of the Reformation, there was not a futurist to be found in the Reformation church, as to a man the Reformers recognized that they were in battle with the predominant antichrist of their era, the apostate papacy. The only futurism to be found was that fabricated by said apostate...

Here it is from one of your own. Futurism's apostate origin. Confirmed by dispensational futurist Clarence Larkin, author, Dispensational "Truth". "The “Futurist School” interprets the language of the Apocalypse “literally,” except such symbols as are named as such and hold that the whole of...

The word "Pharasitical" does not exist. You're apparently unable to understand the difference between faith/belief and works. Explain how faith/belief is a "work". James repeatedly distinguishes between faith/belief and works (James 2), so James indisputably recognizes that faith/belief is...

You're the only one doing the connecting. What gives you the authority to attempt to discredit Jesus' warnings to His followers of that generation?

He was saved, but didn't know it. The Holy Spirit, who should have informed him (Romans 8:16), failed to do so. Paul and Silas, men of great discernment, didn't know it. They caused him to sin by admonishing him to believe. You believe thus. I presume that you've redacted all references to...

And you believe that Paul and Silas were culpable as well, because they admonished the jailer to believe.

It's readily apparent that you believe that the jailer's salvation was illegitimate, because he committed the egregious sin of believing.

You seem to have missed Matthew 24:16. Or did you agree previously that that is historical?

Not in Matthew 24:16, He didn't.

Yes. Paul and Silas warned him that if he believed, as they told him to, he would be guilty of meriting and earning salvation. But he wouldn't listen, and he believed, and was saved. As was his whole household.

I was saved in the same way as the jailer was saved. By believing on the Lord Jesus Christ. No senses involved.

That's because Jesus didn't warn them that He was coming. Instead, He warned them to flee. They listened and acted. And survived.

The jailer's experience is clear. He was saved by believing on the Lord Jesus Christ. Nothing to figure out.

There was nothing imperfect about Jesus' warnings, and nothing imperfect about their fulfillment. The Judean Christians escaped and survived.

No. The devils believe that there is one God. The jailer believed on the Lord Jesus Christ for salvation. Note the profound difference.