Search results

LOL at "Christians" defending/justifying hate groups.

Only a zealot could pull off being that pretentious.

Not to mention the existence of theistic evolutionists (usually non-literalist Christians, which are the best Christians IMO) kills the idea that evolutionary theory is atheistic.

Terrible troll is terrible. :thumbsup: Edit: Oh wait, let me add a sardonic smiley face and pink text to justify my smugness.

Is that Yahweh?

Don't forget 'dishonest' in that list of adjectives.

Carl Sagan

This is the kind of response that I can respect. Unfortunately there are too many dishonest, arrogant, and willfully ignorant creationists in this world.

Only what Conservapedia has defined for those words :)

Lying for Jesus.

Yes it's really hard to follow... I think the original post is actually on the second page.

I watched a documentary about Robert MacNamera yesterday and he basically stated if the USA had lost the war, he and the Chiefs of Staff would have been tried and hung for war crimes There is some old quote (which I'm sure I'm misquoting) that goes something like "The winners get to write the...

If I were to wager a guess as to the justification for the use of two atomic bombs: 1) Testing the other design 2) Show Japan they had more than just one bomb 3) Show the Russians they had more than just one bomb I believe that, for the most part, the bomb use was specifically for testing. At...

This thread proves evolution. By reading Robert's posts, you will become dumber and dumber as you go along. At this rate, we'll be turned back into chimps in no time!

Robert, you got owned. I'd suggest some taking some basic university courses so you can be capable of trying to hold an intellectual conversation with people that actually form coherent thoughts and debate about the facts at hand. Instead, you plop down your low card hand, throw up your...

Arguing semantics about the word evolution isn't helping your case, pal. If I were to guess, the only part you are really familiar with in terms of the theory of evolution, is it's name.

Ya this is what I meant by 99+% percent being empty, Alle. :)

Wow that's a much bigger percentage than I thought!

I never really understood the reasoning that there needs to be a justification for the existence of the Universe. Considering that 99.999999%* of the Universe is nothingness anyways. *Totally made that number up but you get my drift.

It is based from observable data (that can be Googled easily enough). This information can lead one to postulate that the Universe began as a singularity and exploded outwards. It is a theory that can possibly explain the start of the Universe. Just because it doesn't involve God, doesn't...