Search results

props to you. teh pwn

no because that would be pitting one's omnipotence against one's self

what do you mean "OK"? and what do you think the US Government should be doing about it?

LOL, sorry, but God is by definition eternal and uncaused. tell me, if EVERYTHING, as you assert, needs a cause, then what caused the universe? and what caused that? and what caused that? etc. there has to be an original cause that was itself uncaused, and the only thing which could be...

wrong forum.

sponges have sperm and egg. mammalian reproductive organs could have evolved from the primitive reproductive system utilized by sponges and flatworms

we are NOT evolving for the simple reason that society has taken natural selection out of the equation. remember? mutation+natural selection+reproduction+time=evolution. we've taken natural selection out of the equation.

there are 2 problems with the "why wont God heal amputees" argument 1: There is a difference between healing someone and spontaneous limb regeneration 2: You have to explain why God is obligated to heal people's amputated limbs and the reason it is a strawman is that it assumes 2 things 1...

it tries to say that because god doesn't "heal" amputees, he must not be real, which is interesting because I'd like to see why God is obligated to "heal" amputees. second, there is a difference between actually healing someone and causing spontaneous limb regeneration

2 problems: 1: WRONG FORUM. this is the creation and evolution forum. take this to the general apologetics board 2: this is a strawman. in one of the gospels, im not sure which, Jesus causes someone's lobbed-off ear to grow back, and it assumes that to "heal" would be to grow the detached limb...

why does it have to be literal again?:scratch:

mmmkay. how many scientific organizations have come out in support of geocentricity?

you're missing the point dad. we know that a man walked down this particular beach, but we didn't actually see this man walk down this beach. its sort of like this fact: there are footprints on the beach fact: these footprints are not weathered theory: someone walked down this beach at most only...

during the first few hundred million years, radioactive elements like Uranium were in abundance. Radioactive decay creates heat, which is why a young earth is impossible

because the magnetic field decay argument is based on an obsolete model. the currently accepted model of the earth's magnetic field is the dynamo model, which predicts magnetic pole reversals

oh boy, the decaying magnetic field argument you know there are observed pole reversals on the sea floors right?

LOL at "what side of the earth is he from?"

im not aware of any inconsistencies with natural selection or descent with modification bacteria dont have exoskeletons. second, how is this a problem for evolution? no no no no no and no. evolutionary predicts "trees" not lineages. how is it impossible for these features to evolve...

I mean, all mammals and birds supposedly have a common designer right? well, why dont I have feathers? they're good for insulation right?

there are crazy people in this world, but mr. Jack T. Chick has his own special kind of craziness.