Search results

Well, so much for the Schrodinger equation

I'll go with decreasing: The Sun (and every one of the billions and billions of stars out there) go through nuclear fusion, which involves two hydrogen atoms fusing into a single helium atom; so you go from two distinct atoms to one. Also, I'm with the above poster that a more appropriate...

We both know they don't use any of those things. They use poor reasoning, questionable information, equivocation, and downright lies to avoid having to expose their worldview to harsh reality.

So if the theory is not based on another theory...? Why would they trick you?

I'm going to go with "OP was a troll who will never return to the thread"

This is an example of a "proof by contradiction" - we assume the statement we want to show true is not true, then show that that leads to something that is obviously untrue (h(G) < h(G)) - this means that our original assumption is false, and shows the thing we want to show is true. Your issue...

You can't disprove God's existence empirically. You also can't disprove Thor, Venus, or the Flying Spaghetti Monster.

I saw this on here a couple years ago - a proof sketch that the idea of mutation always decreasing information is wrong. It doesn't even require a formal definition of "information". So, here goes: Let h(G) denote the information content in genome G. The only requirements on h is that it's...

Nice cop out.

Define what you mean by "information" and "complexity".

Evidence for the Big Bang they have a section called "evidence"

Adam Clarke said it -- I believe it -- Case closed.

I don't think anyone *fully* understands it.... yet.

[/LIST] Really? The bible says that?

I never said any of those things...?

Not true. Also, the government is much more than just the military.

They didn't really "hear" the CMB; they picked it up as noise on some microwave antennae. If they "heard" it, it was because they sent the signal to a speaker.

Let me be more clear. I'm not claiming there was no "sound" involved (in fact, defining sound as "vibrational waves propagating through a medium", i'm sure there was plenty of sound). I'm just making sure that the Big Bang is not interpreted as some type of explosion (the phrase "Big Bang" is a...

FYI, the big bang was an expansion of space, not an explosion or something that would be traditionally associated with "sound".

Q: Is the Big Bang Theory real? A: No, of course not... it's just a TV show.