Search results

As long as the US don't just put it straight back into theirs, great.

Can this board get a sticky thread for those who aren't able to tell the difference between art and real life so they can avoid clogging up the rest of the board with their neurosis? Gets really tiresome after the 30th variant of the same darn thread.

Huh, sounds rather like the Deus Ex Human Revolution ending. Disappointing. I agree also that Bioware aren't amazing, they've been practically making the same game multiple times and getting away with it.

No wonder God watches football instead of playing it. ^_^

No, "Christian" will suffice. Poe's law, and all that.

Brain chemistry, mostly.

Right. It moves from one form to another. The amount, however, does not go down. Do you want to try and make your point again? If you can....

Funny how your god hasn't got any better aim than nature does. I wonder how many ID supporters got rained on.

Yup. Doesn't mean energy has decreased over time though.

Are you one of those Christians that thinks anything they say in witness is fine as long as its done in the name of Jesus? (And if it doesn't work its either not god's will or hard-heartedness on the part of the target?) Just getting that impression as in several hundred posts you haven't...

Nope, basic physics fail. Mass-energy is a conserved quantity. Actually learn about science before you dismiss it.

That's nice. And again, as ever, no calculations are produced.* Again, simply quoting a number and name-dropping is insufficient to back up the point. And it still doesn't change the fact that I wasn't using the argument either you or dad described, so this tangent is irrelevant. *(Don't...

I agree, Christians frequently do try and jury-rig their interpretations to make it look like the Bible has more game than it does. Only after scientists have done the legwork and actually discovered something new, mind. Not impressing anyone with it. Make a detailed prediction well in...

Good thing no-one here said that.

No. I think it's a very precise case of someone retroactively interpreting a poetic segment of the Bible to make it look like it contains more knowledge than it actually does. And for all practical intents in purposes, we CAN calculate the area of a circle. (And if you're going to object that...

It would be, to that portion of the post. Thankfully I didn't leave it at that. Given that evolving is simply genetic change and heredity at its core, not really, no. I don't? No-one does. There is no rhyme nor reason to creationist thinking in this regard. We're done now. Run along.

Wrong. The Bible describes very little about the universe in any useful level of detail. Anyone else's irony meter break?

Don't flatter yourself that the two are comparable. Creationwiki is a joke. To respond generally to the points it raises - how "continuous" does the evidential chain have to be? Generation by generation? Such is an unrealistic burden of proof, which is rendered totally unnecessary by the...

Nope. List of transitional fossils - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia No, that's not why that argument is made. It's made to question a seemingly arbitrary distinction made by creationists between certain degrees of evolution. This doesn't mean that there's some conspiracy to not provide...

Well, I'm concerned about those that do still believe in God. This isn't really answering my point as far as I can see - I'm glad these non-dogmatists have rejected outright literalism, but they don't seem to have a consistent way of determining what certain passages DO mean either. I can...