Search results

I think only Daryl knows the answer.

Since Daryl is busy these days making up new rules of engagement for Adventtalk, I would suggest he consider the following: 1) No one, not even a moderator, is allowed to post under another ID; and 2) Since open and public discussion of administrative action is not allowed, I, as...

Folks, you might want to check out Daryl's latest: (remember the banner there about the first amendment being under attack?) Re: Forum Rules & Registration Agreement « Reply #4 on: Yesterday at 08:40:43 AM » The following Forum Rule has now been modified as shown in the bolded...

Rosie55 The absolute nonsense you write sometimes amazes me. If I were you I would get a better speechwriter. 1. I am going to ignore your comment to PeacefulSDA as her posts speak for themselves and her willingness to speak up for anyone she chooses. 2. You say above to TM, "all...

Peach45 (I would say My Dear Peach45 but I would not want to be seen as harassing you despite your own salutation), Do you have a dictionary handy? I would suggest you also look up the word harassment. I chose my words carefully. While you are at it, you might help Steffan understand...

Hey Everyone~ :wave: In case I forget, please have a wonderful and joyful Sabbath tomorrow. nw

Hi tomatoe:wave: I love how it is ok for some posters (would you like me to list the multiple imperative statements made by Peach45 and Rosie55) to make demands but my request that a victim not be harassed seems to bother you. I guess that is like when you did not like me asking you direct...

Jim, You talking about court cases and your interest in possible legal issues made me think of something. It has been alleged here and elsewhere that Linda received professional counseling by her pastorWith the permission of the author and with editing of names to conform to CF rules, I would...

Jim, Was your job about finding out the truth or finding facts? I doubt that your job was to determine the truth of the matters you were investigating. It seems to me your posts suggest you have already reached a conclusion about many things and then look for facts to support that...

IceDragon101, In many states where a professional has abused their authority it is considered a type of sexual exploitation. Because of the obvious differences between the parties, consent is not even an issue. http://www.advocateweb.org/hope/whatissexualexploitation.asp

Hi Tomatoe:wave: What do you think about the fact that Steffan has posted several times that Judge Rowe states in her decision that Linda lied concerning the royalty payments. Do you believe that is an accurate statement of what Judge Rowe actually said in her decision?

Good morning to you Steffan:wave: You have posted repeatedly concerning certain findings in the tax case. Could you answer a question for me? Is your only knowledge of this matter reading ALJ Rowe's decision or have you discussed it with anyone that was there during the hearing or from...

And remember Truth Magnet, Tomatoe made it quite clear several days ago how he feels about answering questions and that: It seems to me that this attitude makes having any adult conversation with Tomatoe impossible

Hi there Steffan:wave: Just in case you are wondering, I have only talked to one of these individuals once in my life so you seem to be projecting again. As for you dealing in documented facts. You seem to have documented yourself as a liar since you just can't stop talking. You said...

Hey steffan and bonedealer! So glad you enjoyed giving me a CF rating of 1. Have you enjoyed my posts that much? I had no clue what a CF rating even was until I saw you leave your feedback on my homepage. A moderator told me they had turned that feature off to avoid such spiteful ratings...

Bob, Why does this remind me of some of the proposals I read regarding ASI's previously proposed involvement in this matter?

Bob, It also resembles the rant that Aletheia went on this past saturday night: http://www.blacksda.com/forums/index.php?s=&showtopic=13079&view=findpost&p=189184 Then she claims that she has seen the divorce papers at...

I keep reading that the main reason some of you are posting here is to make sure that the truth is told about 3abn. When I read the following post on another forum, the poster's words reminded me so much of my parents love for and belief in 3abn. With the permission of the author of these...

And on what information are you claiming it was calculated? Where you there? And if so, any idea what was said to her after the hearing?

Focus on the truth or on spin, Steffan? Show me where Judge Rowe says Linda lied or are you too stupid to know the diffence in what discrepency means and a lie?