Search results

I am not against the King James Translation of the Bible. I am gainst the arrogant King James- ONLY stance of some Christians. I would in fact welcome someone who would say he is Textus Receptus Only or something thereabout since that is more directly linked to the ORIGINAL LANGUAGES, instead of...

HAHAHAHA! Agree!

Tell it as it is! Let sin be sin and hell be hell, and man without God is lost indeed! People nowadays sing Amazing Grace without even understanding it.

That would be your interpretation. Check out Hebrews 8:13. The nine were reaffirmed, but not the fourth, under the New Covenant. The fourth was also a "type and shadow" pointing to a higher, deeper truth of resting in Christ, and having served its purpose, it was not reaffirmed. I did. Please...

If the Law continues (the way you understand it), then it must continue as a whole. The Decalogue, being only the summary of the Old Covenant, must still be binding. If it is, then the whole Old Covenant IS still binding, for they go together. Remember that when the term Law is used with...

You want to have a formal debate on the Heavenly Sanctuary doctrine? Not here please. This is not the proper venue. Nice of you to misuse Romans 8:7 on me too.

Hi guys! I am a Baptist and I hold the doctrines of grace, but I am not Reformed (in the sense that I hold New Covenant Theology, not Covenant Theology). Can I hang around? No, I am not here to argue.....(Saddam Hussein a ReBap? Hah! That sure made me laugh.) About how calvinists should...

Amen! The KJV is still, undoubtedly one of the most beautiful English translations and one of the highest expressions of English literature, but it is not the perfect translation.

TheLaw was to point out several things, heymikey: it was to show the utter sinfulness of sin, the utter helplessness of depraved man, the utter impossibility of earning salvation by scrupulously keeping the Law, and to point to the coming of the Savior, who would die to pay for the penalty...

Paul was an objective historian He stated the factsas they were, meaning, the intent for bringing down Jesus' body was to avoid breaking the Sabbath commandment. This was a bunch of Jews, remember, who thought their hopes were shattered when the person they thought was the Messiah wss murdered...

Heymikey, I was referring to keepng the Law. I never said we are to keep the Law now, or that keeping it was needed for salvation. We are no longer under the Law (wich, in New Covenant Theology understanding, includes the Ten Commandments, since the Bible points them out to be THE Covenant...

The fact a lot of people use the NIV does not make it the Word of God. - Same statement applies to the KJV

To those who want to really learn: http://www.bible-researcher.com/kingjames.html

True

Do you expect me to post the complete 613 commandments from the Old Testament?

Matthew 5:17-18 and the Sabbath “ 17 ‘Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. 18I tell you the truth, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means...

When the New Testament lists sins, Sabbath breaking is conspicuously absent: -In Mark 7:21-22 13 sins are listed. Jesus did not mention breaking the Sabbath. -In Romans 1:29-32 20 sins are listed and not one of them is Sabbath breaking. -In Galatians 5:19-21 a list of 15 sins are...

REPOST: Are Christians not commanded to keep the Ten Commandments? Technically, they are not. The New Testament says: 4Christ is the end of the law so that there may be righteousness for everyone who believes. 5Moses describes in this way the righteousness that is by the law...

I think the intent of the law there is clear, heymikey. It is covetousness that is condemned, and the definition for "neighbor" has also been extended to cover everybody. listed the NT references to the 10 Commandments, with the note that the Sabbath commandment was never reiterated. Of course...

@erdnuss, You would probably love Wayne Grudem's Systematic Theology. He is a non-cessationist calvinist.