Search results

You are either honestly following the evidence or you aren't. Although denialists theories such as creationism and ID portray themselves as alternative theories, they are almost universally grounded on a misunderstanding of the facts rather than a different interpretation.

Garbage is garbage even if a PhD says it. Expanding earth doesn't work. what are sub-sub-sub atomic particles? is that a technical term? There still is no credible mechanism by which the earth could expand. Where are these sub-sub-sub atomic particles? What's making them? At what rate is this...

A new piece of the family tree. So, out of Africa happened a lot. It's actually quite amazing that of all the human species that were cohabitating not so long ago that we are the only one left.

Expanding earth? You do realize that violates many laws of physics including conservation of mass. There's no viable mechanism for it. The movements of the plates, while small, is measurable. If the earth were growing even slowly we would be able to detect it. Expanding earth and venus as a...

Kindly explain mountains, mountain ranges, earthquakes, volcanoes, tsunamis, etc without invoking plate tectonics. Thor or Zeus? Cthulhu? Ents?

Fringe science doesn't count as facts.

With the lone exception of the literature review poster, all of them are pre-1988 so obviously these ideas haven't stood the test of scientific scrutiny otherwise the whole Venus comet thing would have become common knowledge astronomy years ago. It's a scientifically dead idea. It doesn't even...

So by scientific fact you mean quoting homer, aristotle, and some crank (a psychoanalyst...relevant field?) in the 40s who derived his ideas from mythology and not astronomy?

:confused:...:confused:...:confused: Just :confused:!!! What planet/comet are you from?

If by history of the Jewish people we include the sun standing still and the red sea parting then yes. Walking trees is more in agreement with the laws of physics.

What's that supposed to mean?

Lord of the Rings is more realistic than the bible. potayto potahto.

So you link to a discovery that supports human evolution in order discredit human evolution? I'm so confused. Nice Flintstones imagery btw.

Personally, my money's on Gandalf. :rolleyes:

If there is then that would be my guess as well. DNA can't be 100% perfectly copied forever.

http://green.yahoo.com/blog/guest_bloggers/26/the-world-s-only-immortal-animal.html Very cool. Who knows what implications this has if we can find any application in humans as we study this guy?

1) Well it's a crater not a dome so obviously it came from above. 2) When we say impact we mean by a space object like an asteroid. IOW, from above! 3) Water can't make that! An impact crater the size of Massachusetts, a global geologic layer (jealous?) filled with iridium which earth almost...

which warp zone or did you derive that celestial knowledge from? Star Trek Battlestar Galactica? No No I know you got it from Doctor Who. :doh: Seriously where does this come from? any facts to support your speculation?

The next time Texas wants to secede...just let em go. Joe McCarthy wasn't such a bad guy? Thomas Aquinas was more central to the founding of the country than Thomas Jefferson? The Enlightenment period wasn't relevant to our founding? Yes, there is such thing as a dangerous level of stupid...

you keep asking us to elaborate on the shocked quartz but it is infact the presence of shocked quartz that establishes impact causation. The size of the crater means that the rock was HUGE, frighteningly huge. The size of the crater combined with other geological evidence of the same...