Search results

I'm constantly in a crisis of faith - not necessarily in God, however. Have had those from time to time.

Sure! :) Brilliant Actor, RIP.

Nobody is talking about excuses. I'm just telling you how life happens. (shrug). While I'm responsible for my behaviour, behaviour often follows the affects of OTHERS' behavior. You can get all pie-in-the-sky, fine. It does NOT change the fact If I'm constantly breaking my vows to love and...

Absolutely not true. I stopped reading right there because it's clear you didn't understand what I wrote. I never mentioned Tit-for-tat. I never mentioned 'two wrongs', I spoke of action (or inaction) and consequence.

you are agreeing with me. (shrug). Marriage vows are MORE than 'forsake all others'.

Some have 'sexual impurity' some have 'marital unfaithfulnes'. Both can be defined many ways. I'm saying, the scripture is NOT giving 'excuses' for Divorce (saying "It's okay under these circumstances" - it's Christ saying, unless a person has defiled themselves with fornication already...

Yes! Easter will be at my In-laws, as always. :)

Jesus said (and some translation use 'unfaithfulness' instead of 'fornication') "If you divorce somebody you make them an adulterer. Except if you divorced them because they've already adultered themselves through fornication. In that case, THEY have made themselves an adulterer. Also -...

That's not exactly accurate to my understanding. Christ said if you divorce for reasons OTHER than fornication, you're committing adultery. That's very much NOT the same as "It's okay to divorce if one person has an affair."

I've been affected, but never harmed. Had a Tornado touch down while I was n Basic Training, at Fort Sill OK. Also have had a few earthquakes growing up :)

I think you're right on target. :)

Thanks mk - It brings me no pleasure to think about these things; it brings conviction for the times I've broken vows to my wife. :-/

I believe lots of people hold that opinion to absolve themselves of the reality of their guilt.

:thumbsup:

Righto - I recognize his name- have seen his work...just don't regularly read, nor do I recall any of his work.:)

I haven't...not knowingly. I recognize the name, however. :)

Wow. Limbaugh. Hannity just bothers me a bit. Plus, I think Limbaugh pysses-off more of the Godless Liberals I know. :-) These questions have been softballs guys....Hit me with somethin! :)

Batman. He's closer to 'real'. Plus, Spiders skeer me. :D

Right - and your Opinion is flat wrong. I described enjoying my wife WANTING me. I wrote, it's healthy for couples to be drawn to each other by instinct - for them to see each other and CRAVE the other. You shift definitions to suit your views. You said that was 'two different things'...

You are REALLY confusing me. Is my wife Sinning by having a strong physical urge to have intercourse with me? Is that what you're saying? I get the idea you change how you define words to make sure you're never wrong. ;) So you're saying one could watch inappropriate content and 'not' lust. You're saying...