Search results

other than to reason that they sought higher ground to avoid drowning. The evidence of their struggle against the sea probably got submerged beneath the rising waters - all that they passed on was the account of once having lived 'over there where it is now water!'. But I agree this is all...

no worries.:thumbsup: Now.. I'm gonna screw with your head and tell you that I believe in the global flood. And I also believe that the legends of the flood are possibly based on things that actually happend - and science itself proposes these things. The only thing I don't believe is that the...

1.. All PEOPLE should be good stewards of the EARTH. This doesn't 'include' the earth this means the earth - its the only one we got!. Also there are more non-christians than christians. 2.. It is not biblical to warn of global ecological catastrophy. Perhaps the bible should be updated to...

Once again errors in early science are held up as proof of its inherant inaccuracy. Once again early science has been shown to be inaccurate after further tests. Once again christian fundamentalists completely miss the point.

Heaven forbid that the west should recognise the wealth of knowledge held within indigenous populations! Western science discovered the Tasty Cucumber Rat! - in a market place. I did note with quite some amusement that they needed to discover it themselves as well. By looking at poo.

[b] [/font] Inspired. Might I venture that I think it might be a hairy rodent that looks like a rat. Perhaps pushing the envelope I'll add that there appear to be 4 legs and a tail to this beast. To be honest I think the article raises some questions. 1.. If it was on sale next to some...

After reading your OP and then this I think you need some straightening.. So here's --- AT PEACE'S TECTONICS FOR BEGINNERS LESSON 1 --- This is gonna be really fun Worry'n'Angel. I want you to get your mess clothes on 'cos we don't want you to ruin your sunday best now do we? Here...

the theory may never have been flawed. New observations or calculations lending weight to the theory have been made. They don't put the theory beyond doubt though. Such is the way of science.

sorry John.. my bad.. I learnt something today..

Its not that hard to understand really - Binary is the base used by microprocessors to represent information. In the past computers were just too slow (ie too expensive) to be able to deal with the vast amounts of information present in music and speech etc. The theory is very simple: To...

The only thing you ever seem to expose is: a) your antagonism towards anything you can't understand b) your complete inability to rationalise an issue c) your closed mindedness concerning anything other than YEC d) your ignorance and misuse of simple concepts Put it this way John. You might...

The point I was making is - only in America could a scientific theory stand trial - in a court. That's just downright weird. I can think of only one country that has the population, political mix and money that can make it possible. The evolution of American culture has reached a point of...

This is something that worries me no end. And that (bold text) is why. From here (Australia) this debate is laughable. The average schmoe on the street has a fairly healthy respect for science. If this were to occur here it would be so vicuously lampooned by the mainstream media (even Lawsie...

I hate to say it but.. *ONLY* in America.

WorryAnAngel.. If I thought it would help, I would pray for you because reason has no effect. On the OP you asked how the first people 'zipped' into existence could survive. The simple answer is - they wouldn't. They would perish within days. There is nothing in the OT about how to search...

All quiet on the YEC front... any YEC's have a comment to make? While were on the subject of astronomy, what do YEC's make of Quasars? http://www-astronomy.mps.ohio-state.edu/~ryden/ast162_8/notes36.html

Actually when you think about it, Adenine only pairs with Thymine and Cytosine with Guanine so you could call the AT pair 0 and CG pair 1 and you're back to a binary system. No 4's involved.

But then again, (aimed mostly at john) most scientists are NOT in it for the money. People follow science because they are intelligent and passionate.

His life is improved by furthering his own understanding of a subject regardless of a practical improvement. I am as fervent an atheist as anyone however I would not argue against reading the bible because it is 'useless'. I would actually argue for reading the bible so as to increase ones...

Assume NOTHING!