Search results

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

That's beginning to sound like you're digging yourself an epistemological hole. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, therefore the lack of evidence supporting god's existence is a necessary, but not a sufficient premise to make the statement of fact that god doesn't exist. Strong...

The answer depends on the definition of god and the evidence reviewed, doesn't it? See also Martin Willet's take: There are different types of atheists

Not to forget that one can be weakly atheistic towards deities in general, but strongly atheistic towards particular gods. Many atheists are apathetic towards the god of philosophy, but reject the Abrahamic deities for metaphysical reasons.

Homosexual animals and biased observers? Oh my.

The schools should teach the facts, including all the nitty-gritty details of human sexuality, up to and including contraception and abortion, and leave it to the parents to deal with behavioural issues.

I beg to differ.