IloveJesusMyFather3:16 said:
I was watching Dennis Murray on Shepherd's Chapel. It's a bible study tv show. He was reading in 2 Chronicles - 21:20 to be exact. He was reading about a king who departed without being desired. Does this mean - he left and the people didn't care or were happy about it? Okay, here is the strange question: When he was talking about this king, he said, "There is another person who will reign in Jerusellum who will depart without being desired. I'm talking about into the abyss for the millinium". Does anyone have any idea what he was talking about. Doesn't sound like English to me. ha ha. Sometimes I feel like that man and his father too - are so smart I can't even understand what they are talking about. ha ha. Thanks.
One more real quick question: He said something about Elijah writing a letter after he was taken up. Does anyone know about this? I don't remember reading that.
I'm sorry I missed that lecture.
"There is another person who will reign in Jerusalem who will depart without being desired. I'm talking about into the abyss for the millinium".
I have been studying with The Shepherd's Chapel
for ten years. Therefore,
I know that Dennis Murray was speaking of the "vile person, to whom they shall not give the honour of the kingdom: but he shall come in peaceably, and
obtain the kingdom by flatteries." (
Dan 11:21)
In other words, this is the false king, the antichrist, Satan. And when he is cast into the pit for the Millenium (
Rev. 20:1-3), people will not desire him, naturally, though they will look upon him in wonder (
Isa. 14:16).
Dennis Murray was most likely using
2 Chronicles 21:20 as a
type for what is prophetic.
Concerning the letter written by Elijah after he was taken up, you may have misunderstood him. The Shepherd's Chapel has referenced
2 Chron. 21:12 and pointed out that
michetab, the writing, from Elijah was written while he was still alive, naturally, because by that time, he was dead (oops...I meant "taken up").
Those websites about The Shepherd's Chapel either:
1. Lie about what it teaches.
2. Twist what it teaches.
3. Base their reproof on traditional interpretation of Scripture, as opposed to context, the MSS, and they generally tend to have an all-around faulty understanding of the Holy Writ.
Poptea4. htm is one of them.
So try this instead:
http://khyron_4.tripod.com/PMurray/PMurray.html