"What else should I conclude? Should I conclude that God is at fault in his word by not making things clearer? No, that is not a valid charge to make toward God. Or does the fault lie in the way the bible student handles the scripture? Yes, I like this answer much better."
This is nothing I have not already said as well, along with the rest of your last post.
With your Acts 2:38 verse
what of Romans 10:9?
If a man confesses with his mouth and beleives in his heart that jesus Christ is Lord, HE SHALL BE SAVED.
First of all, Acts 2:38 is not any more my verse than Romans 10:9 is your verse. These scriptures are both a part of God's word. They are his. It is necessary to accept that both are true. Neither verse says that they are the sole steps to pleasing God. Both scriptures must be obeyed? Correct? If not, why not?
Within context, no verse says you need baptism to be saved. even 1st peter 3:21, I hear that alot, but that is talking about noah and the flood being symbolic for baptism.
Drawing from the language of the NKJV in 1 Peter 3:21, "There is also an antitype which now saves us, namely baptism." The thought is that baptism saves us. How?
Just as water (the type) saved the eight souls on the ark (vs.20), baptism (the antitype) saves us (vs.21).
Mark 16:16 "He that believes and is baptized will be saved." (belief + baptism = salvation)
Acts 22:16 "Arise, and be baptized, and wash away your sins, calling on the name of the Lord."
Those passages all harmonize and teach that baptism is necessary for salvation.
No, it is not difficult to see what the bible has to say about baptism to me. Truthfully, when I hear people say you need to be baptised to be saved, the first word that comes to mind is heresy. However, if there are this many posts, and we yet have come to a conclusion on whether or not baptism is necessary, then there is a problem, do you not agree? It has nothing to do with the bible, it has to do with us.
Heresy??? It's one thing to make a charge. It's totally another to support it with scripture. 1 Peter 4:11 say, "If anyone speaks, let him speak as the oracles of God." I don't believe I saw any scriptural reasoning with your charge. If your insinuation is true (that baptism is not necessary for salvation), then it should only take a few post to clarify things. Correct?
I was simply implying that people discover the answer themselves and let their lives parallel the bible and what it has to say... just as I did.
Jesus's blood cleanses our sins, not baptism.
Baptism is the remission of our sins for the simple fact we will then have acountability and have taken the first step of obediance to God, causing our sins to remise.
Ephesians 1:7 "In Him we have redemption through His blood, the forgiveness of sins . . . "
How does one get into Christ to receive this blessing?
Galatians 3:27 "For as many of you as were baptized into Christ have put on Christ."
Remission of sins does not deal with salvation.
What bible dictionary are you using?
Young's Analytical Concordance defines the Greek word "aphesis" (the word "remission" in Acts 2:38) as a sending away. The same Greek word is used in Matthew 26:28 ("For this is My blood of the new covenant, which is shed for many for the remission of sins.") and in Acts 10:43 ". . . whoever believes in Him will receive remission of sins."
I am afraid I do not see how you determined that the remission of sins does not deal with salvation. What am I missing?
God wants us to be saved, yes, but that is not why Jesus came. Jesus came to have workers to reproduce reproducers. Hence the 12 disciples who started the churches, hence why baptism was so necessary.
Really?
"For the Son of Man has come to save that which was lost." Matthew 18:11
Care to explain?
I will say this is about the 3rd i have made this statement...
I accepted Christ into my heart when I was14, and reedicated when I was 15. After my rededication I started to grow spiritually and learn Gods word and acuratly handle His word.
I was batized soon after I became 18 years old, 6 months ago. I was baptized b/c I knew it was needed for me to do Gods work and to minister unto people. Jesus did the same before he went on his ministry. I felt no change and saw no change due to my baptism and still have seen no drastic changes b/c of it. I did see life changing events taking place in my life between my ages of 15 and 18. Yes I am still growing, and always will be.
Baptism has nothing to do with heaven or hell. It has to do with obediance and sprititual growth.