Should the U.N. move?

Which of these areas would be the best location for the U.N. headquarters?

  • New York. You can't beat where it is now.

  • North America. But not in New York.

  • South America.

  • Europe.

  • Asia.

  • Africa.

  • Australia.

  • The South Pole. Get them as far away as possible.


Results are only viewable after voting.

Palatka44

Unabashedly Baptist
Jul 22, 2003
1,908
94
67
Palatka, Florida
Visit site
✟17,727.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
cbk said:
Hey, for the sake of the world, should the U.N. move out of the United States to a different area? Put aside budgetary issues and focus on what would be geographically the best location -- considering cultures, religions, etc.

Furnish a city, if you please.
Why not a newly rebuilt Babylon? :rolleyes:
 
Upvote 0

datan

Well-Known Member
Nov 16, 2002
5,865
100
Visit site
✟6,836.00
Faith
Protestant
cbk said:
In that case, only France would be left.

Minus

U.S.A. -- Iraq
England -- due to its active part with Iraq.
Russia -- Invasions of some eastern bloc countries
China -- Tibet

oh yes, why not?
The current model is deeply flawed.
Major countries such as Germany, Japan don't have much influence in the UN Security Council.
 
Upvote 0

datan

Well-Known Member
Nov 16, 2002
5,865
100
Visit site
✟6,836.00
Faith
Protestant
Ryder said:
They should move it to Germany, France, or an Arab nation. Let 'likes' lie together.

exactly. It should go to countries which don't invade others on false pretexts (wait, wasn't that what Iraq did 13 years ago?).

To let the UN remain in the US would be a mockery of everything the UN stands for--conflict resolution, not warmongering.
 
Upvote 0

ThePhoenix

Well-Known Member
Aug 12, 2003
4,708
108
✟5,476.00
Faith
Christian
platzapS said:
What's with the UN-bashing from Christians? I think it is doing the world a great service with its aid programs, programs to further science, etc...
I think it's part of the Neo-Conservative hijacking of the christian right. The Neo-cons really hate the UN because of the mitigating influence it has on Imperialism and exploitation.

Other then that I think a lot of it is due to the fact that the UN is largely non-christian, and much of it reflects that.
 
Upvote 0

Ryder

Whatever was the deplorable word
Jan 13, 2003
5,383
261
42
Michigan
✟15,589.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
platzapS said:
What's with the UN-bashing from Christians? I think it is doing the world a great service with its aid programs, programs to further science, etc...

Yeah, Christians love all those pro-gay, pro-choice, pro-world religion programs the UN sponsers. Come on, I'm not saying feeding starving kids is a bad thing, but truth be told, the UN does less of that than their much bigger edjucation programs to teach kids around the world about political correctness, abortion, homosexuality, and all kinds of stuff put forth as just great by the UN, is it any wonder Christians hate the UN?
 
Upvote 0

Brother Christman

Constitution Party->11.04
Jun 26, 2003
744
4
53
TX, USA
Visit site
✟15,914.00
Faith
Baptist
datan said:
To let the UN remain in the US would be a mockery of everything the UN stands for--conflict resolution, not warmongering.

You forgot to add “abortion” (including forced ones as means of population control), “homosexuality”, “prostitution” (many areas occupied by UN “peacekeepers” have mysteriously seen a rise in the abduction of girls and nonconsentual prostitution), “paganism” (i.e. the Earth Charter and ark of hopelessness its stored in), brainwashing (of even very young school children via UNESCO's Earth Charter curriculum)... the list goes on and on.

platzapS said:
What's with the UN-bashing from Christians? I think it is doing the world a great service with its aid programs, programs to further science, etc...

They're not (half) as entirely benign as they'd appear. More than one Columbian drug lord has sponsored a local orphanage(s), but this doesn't mean the Scarface-types are hanging up their chainsaws.

ThePhoenix said:
I think it's part of the Neo-Conservative hijacking of the christian right. The Neo-cons really hate the UN because of the mitigating influence it has on Imperialism and exploitation.

While the neo-cons (are dangerous and) oppose the UN (in public), most God-fearing (true) conservatives do, as well for the reasons above. Not all neos apparently oppose it, either – President Bush (sold God-fearing America out when he) gave UNESCO $71 million this July in H.R. 1950.
 
Upvote 0

Brother Christman

Constitution Party->11.04
Jun 26, 2003
744
4
53
TX, USA
Visit site
✟15,914.00
Faith
Baptist
ThePhoenix said:
Oh come on, show me some UN program that promotes homosexuality in other countries.

Hello?

Most of their sex "education" literature pitches homosexuality as (though it were) a normal, healthy choice equal to heterosexual relationships. They've since scrubbed it from the Web, but a sex ed pamphlet they released (in the 90's, if memory serves) even suggested minors and animals as a means of releasing sexual tension. They claimed it was a "misprint" and blamed it on the Mexican printers. :(
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
Brother Christman said:
You forgot to add “abortion” (including forced ones as means of population control), “homosexuality”, “prostitution” (many areas occupied by UN “peacekeepers” have mysteriously seen a rise in the abduction of girls and nonconsentual prostitution)

I trust you can supply proof of those accusations?
 
Upvote 0

Brother Christman

Constitution Party->11.04
Jun 26, 2003
744
4
53
TX, USA
Visit site
✟15,914.00
Faith
Baptist
strathyboy said:
But I do worry. All too frequently on these boards, posters make accusations for which they have no evidence.

That's unfortunate.

You'll no longer find this at the UN news wire site (hmm), but:

----------------------

News Briefs UN Wire, 24th August 2001
http://www.unfoundation.org/unwire/current.asp#17302
1. ERITREA: U.N. Peacekeepers Allegedly Involved In Child Prostitution
2. CAMBODIA: Illegal Sex Trade Valued At $511 Million
************************

1. ERITREA: U.N. Peacekeepers Allegedly Involved In Child Prostitution

An Italian military prosecutor is investigating claims that Danish and Slovak soldiers with the U.N. Mission in Ethiopia and Eritrea were involved in a sex scandal involving the purchase of child prostitutes, Corriere Della Serra reports. An Italian military dependent with the Red Cross is also among the accused, the Italian daily reports.

Military prosecutor Maurizio Block said sources told him that the peacekeeping troops were purchasing local girls as young as 10 for small sums in order to sexually abuse them in hotels. In several cases, the perpetrators allegedly filmed the incidents. Block also said it is possible that even though international military authorities were aware of the incidents, they did nothing to stop them (Corriere Della Serra, Aug. 24, UN Wire translation). La Repubblica reports that the incidents were organized events and that possibly others were involved (Giampaolo Cadalanu, Aug. 24, UN Wire translation).

Block said he has been working several weeks on the case and has "concrete" and credible information obtained from an Italian military officer who has since returned from duty with UNMEE. Italian troops in Eritrea, however, deny the allegations, claiming they heard nothing about such incidents.

Despite the seriousness of the charges, Block said the military is considering whether to turn the case over to civil courts. According to Italian military regulations, personnel on peacekeeping missions who commit crimes abroad are charged as civilians and are not subject to military law.

Voicing regret that the case could be turned over to civilian authorities, Block said, "We are talking about military forces on a peace mission among a foreign population who have committed grave acts against the local population. Turning this case over to a normal court will end in them being tried as simple sex tourists" (Corriere Della Serra).
******************

2. CAMBODIA: Illegal Sex Trade Valued At $511 Million

Cambodia's illegal sex trade has generated up to $511 million, more than all the foreign assistance the country receives, according to a recent report on Southeast Asia by Canada's Future Group.

"(This) isn't our opinion, it's based on hundreds of interviews with victims and organizations," said Ben Perrin, the group's executive director. Perrin and three other Canadians spent four months in Phnom Penh investigating human rights violations against children and women. Estimates indicate there are millions of women and children working as sex slaves in Cambodia.

Perrin said that before 15,000 U.N. troops arrived in the country in 1991, there were only 1,000 prostitutes in the capital, but now the number has skyrocketed. The problem is also exacerbated by organized crime, sex tourism and police corruption.

"Cambodia is at risk of becoming a nation of slaves," Perrin said. "Sex slavery in Southeast Asia will go down in history as the greatest tragedy the world ignored" (Emma Poole, Calgary Herald, Aug. 23).
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
Brother Christman said:
News Briefs UN Wire, 24th August 2001
http://www.unfoundation.org/unwire/current.asp#17302
1. ERITREA: U.N. Peacekeepers Allegedly Involved In Child Prostitution
2. CAMBODIA: Illegal Sex Trade Valued At $511 Million

So from this you conclude that the UN itself supports prostitution and child prostitution? I hope I don't need to point out the logical flaw.
 
Upvote 0

Brother Christman

Constitution Party->11.04
Jun 26, 2003
744
4
53
TX, USA
Visit site
✟15,914.00
Faith
Baptist
strathyboy said:
So from this you conclude that the UN itself supports prostitution and child prostitution? I hope I don't need to point out the logical flaw.

I'm not saying it's in their charter any more than a money-laundering dry cleaner would list something other than martinizing on their bill of services... but what an organization stands for is most accurately defined not by its rhetoric, but by its actions.
 
Upvote 0
Brother Christman said:
I'm not saying it's in their charter any more than a money-laundering dry cleaner would list something other than martinizing on their bill of services... but what an organization stands for is most accurately defined not by its rhetoric, but by its actions.

Great, super. So where is your proof that the UN's actions are in support of prostitution, homosexuality, and abortion?

If the actions of a couple of members of an organization is necessarily taken as representative of what that group stands for then perhaps you'll tell me why we shouldn't believe that the Catholic church supports child-molestation? Or why the US doesn't support slaughtering civilians (a la the My Lai massacre)? Do you see the logical problem?
 
Upvote 0