Unforgivable Sin

Status
Not open for further replies.

duster1az

Active Member
Jun 25, 2003
291
0
63
Southwest
Visit site
✟421.00
Faith
Christian
Chris Judo writes: "It says that blasphemy against the Holy Spirit is unforgivable. But when you reject the Holy Spirit, isnt it the same as rejecting God? But it says that rejecting God is forgiven. Can anyone explain to me what its talking about in the Gospels?"

First, it should be noted that this sin against the Holy Spirit (Matt.12:31-32, Mark 3:28-30, Luke 12:10) consisted in asserting that Christ's works, which were produced by the Holy Spirit, were accomplished by Satan. The same setting can't be found today since Christ isn't in the world as He was then, nor is He any longer producing His works by the Holy Spirit. Therefore, it's impossible for this sin to be committed any longer.

To say that attributing works men may be doing in the power of the Holy Spirit to Satan is the same offense is to go beyond what is written. The possibility of this sin being committed ceased with Christ's removal from the earth. But even more importantly it should be declared that the "so-called" unpardonable sin can't be present where there is a "whosoever will" gospel preached. The promises and invitations would then be addressed only to those who haven't sinned, but no such restriction has ever been imposed in any grace relationship.

There is, however, an unpardonable state and that being to die without trusting Christ as Savior.

In Christ,
Tracey
 
Upvote 0

frumanchu

God's justice does not demand second chances
Supporter
Apr 5, 2003
6,713
469
47
Ohio
✟62,780.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
I apologize for the length, but perhaps this passage from R.C. Sproul will shed some light...

WHAT IS THE UNPARDONABLE SIN?

In our discussions on assurance of salvation and the perseverance of the saints, we touched on the question of the unforgivable sin. The fact that Jesus warns against the committing of a sin that is unforgivable is beyond dispute. The questions we must face then are these: What is the unforgivable sin? Can Christians commit this sin?

Jesus defined it as blasphemy against the Holy Spirit:

Therefore I say to you, every sin and blasphemy will be forgiven men, but the blasphemy against the Spirit will not be forgiven men.
Anyone who speaks a word against the Son of Man, it will be forgiven him; but whoever speaks against the Holy Spirit, it will not be forgiven him, either in this age or in the age to come
(Matthew 12:31, 32).

In this text Jesus does not provide a detailed explanation of the nature of this dreadful sin. He declares that there is such a sin and gives an ominous warning about it. The rest of the New Testament adds little in the way of further explanation. As a result of this silence, there has been much speculation about the unforgivable sin.

Two sins have been frequently mentioned as candidates for the unforgivable sin: adultery and murder. Adultery is chosen on the grounds that it represents a sin against the Holy Spirit because the body is the temple of the Holy Spirit. Adultery was a capital crime in the Old Testament. The reasoning is that, since it deserved the death penalty and involved a violation of the temple of the Holy Spirit, this must be the unpardonable sin.

Murder is chosen for similar reasons. Since man is created in the image of God, an attack upon the human person is considered an attack upon God himself. To slay the image-bearer is to insult the One whose image is borne. Likewise murder is a capital sin. We add to this the fact that murder is a sin against the sanctity of life. Since the Holy Spirit is the ultimate “life force,” to kill a human being is to insult the Holy Spirit.

As attractive as these theories may be to speculators, they have not gained the consent of most biblical scholars. A more popular view has to do with the final resistance to the Holy Spirit’s application of Christ’s work of redemption. Final unbelief is then seen as the unpardonable sin. If a person repeatedly, fully, and finally repudiates the gospel, then there is no hope of future forgiveness.
What all three of these theories lack is a serious consideration of the meaning of blasphemy. Blasphemy is something that we do with our mouths. It deals with what we say out loud. Certainly it can also be done with the pen, but blasphemy is a verbal sin.

The Ten Commandments include a prohibition against blasphemy. We are forbidden to make frivolous or irreverent use of the name of God. In God’s eyes the verbal abuse of his holy name is a serious enough matter to make it to his top ten list of commands. This tells us that blasphemy is a serious matter in God’s sight. It is a heinous sin to blaspheme any member of the Godhead.

Does this mean that anyone who has ever abused the name of God has no possible hope of forgiveness, now or ever? Does it mean that if a person curses once, using the name of God, that he is doomed forever? I think not.

It is crucial to note in this text that Jesus makes a distinction between sinning against him (the Son of Man), and sinning against the Holy Spirit. Does this mean that it is OK to blaspheme the first person of the Trinity and the second person of the Trinity, but to insult the third person is to cross the boundaries of forgiveness? This hardly makes sense.

Why then would Jesus make such a distinction between sinning against himself and against the Holy Spirit? I think the key to answering this question is the key to the whole question of the blasphemy against the Holy Spirit. That key is found in the context in which Jesus originally gave his severe warning.

In Matthew 12:24 we read: “But when the Pharisees heard it they said, ‘This fellow does not cast out demons except by Beelzebub, the ruler of the demons.’” Jesus responds with a discourse about a house divided against itself and the foolishness of the idea that Satan would work to cast out Satan. His warning about the unpardonable sin is the conclusion of this discussion. He introduces his severe warning with the word therefore.

The situation runs something like this: The Pharisees are being repeatedly critical of Jesus. Their verbal attacks upon him get more and more vicious. Jesus had been casting out demons “By the Finger of God,” which means by the Holy Spirit. The Pharisees sink so low as to accuse Jesus of doing his holy work by the power of Satan. Jesus warns them. It is as if he were saying: “Be careful. Be really careful. You are coming perilously close to a sin for which you cannot be forgiven. It is one thing to attack me, but watch yourselves. You’re treading on holy ground here.”

We still wonder why Jesus made the distinction between sinning against the Son of Man and sinning against the Spirit. We notice that even from the cross Jesus pled for the forgiveness of those who were murdering him. On the day of Pentecost Peter spoke of the horrible crime against Christ committed in the crucifixion, yet still held out hope for forgiveness to those who had participated in it. Paul says, “but we speak the wisdom of God in a mystery, the hidden wisdom which God ordained before the ages for our glory, which none of the rulers of this age knew; for had they known, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory (1 Cor. 2:7, 8).

These texts indicate an allowance of sorts for human ignorance. We must remember that when the Pharisees accused Jesus of working by the power of Satan they did not yet have the benefit of the fullness of God’s disclosure of the true identity of Christ. These charges were made before the resurrection. To be sure, the Pharisees should have recognized Christ, but they did not. Jesus’ words from the cross are important: “Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.”

When Jesus gave the warning and distinguished between blasphemy against the Son of Man and blasphemy against the Holy Spirit it was at a time when he had not yet been made fully manifest. We note that this distinction tends to fall away after the resurrection, Pentecost, and the ascension. Note what the author of Hebrews declares:

For if we sin willfully after we have received the knowledge of the truth, there no longer remains a sacrifice for sins, but a certain fearful expectation of judgment, and fiery indignation which will devour the adversaries. Anyone who has rejected Moses’ law dies without mercy on the testimony of two or three witnesses. Of how much worse punishment, do you suppose, will he be thought worthy who has trampled the Son of God underfoot, counted the blood of the covenant by which he was sanctified a common thing, and insulted the Spirit of grace? (Hebrews 10:26-29).

In this passage the distinction between sinning against Christ and against the Spirit falls away. Here, to sin against Christ is to insult the Spirit of grace. The key is in the willful sin after we have received the knowledge of the truth.

If we take the first line of this text as an absolute, none of us has a hope of heaven. We all sin willfully after we know the truth. A specific sin is in view here, not each and every sin. I am persuaded that the specific sin in view here is the blasphemy against the Holy Spirit.
I agree with the New Testament scholars who conclude that the unforgivable sin is to blaspheme Christ and the Holy Spirit by saying Jesus is a devil when you know better. That is, the unforgivable sin cannot be done in ignorance. If a person knows with certainty that Jesus is the Son of God and then declares with his mouth that Jesus is of the devil, that person has committed unpardonable blasphemy.

Who commits such a sin? This is a sin common to devils and to totally degenerate people. The devil knew who Jesus was. He could not plead ignorance as an excuse.

One of the fascinating facts of history is the strange way in which unbelievers speak of Jesus. The vast majority of unbelievers speak of Jesus with great respect. They may attack the church with great hostility but still speak of Jesus as a “great man.” Only once in my life have I heard a person say out loud that Jesus was a devil. I was shocked to see a man stand in the middle of the street shaking his fist toward heaven and screaming at the top of his lungs. He cursed God and used every obscenity he could utter in attacking Jesus. I was equally shocked only hours later when I saw the same man on a stretcher with a bullet hole in his chest. It was self-inflicted. He died before morning.

Even that dreadful sight did not drive me to the conclusion that the man had actually committed the unpardonable sin. I had no way of knowing if he was ignorant of Christ’s true identity or not.

Saying that Jesus is a devil is not something we see many people do. It is, however, possible for people to know the truth of Jesus and sink this low. One does not need to be born again to have an intellectual knowledge of the true identity of Jesus. Again, the unregenerate demons know who he is.

What of Christians? Is it possible for a Christian to commit the unforgivable sin and thereby lose his salvation? I think not. The grace of God makes it impossible. In ourselves we are capable of any sin, including blasphemy against the Holy Spirit. But God preserves us from this sin. He preserves us from full and final fall, guarding our lips from this horrible crime. We perform other sins and other kinds of blasphemy, but God in his grace restrains us from committing the ultimate blasphemy.

Sproul, R. C. (1986). Chosen by God. Wheaton, IL: Tyndale House Publishers.
 
Upvote 0

frumanchu

God's justice does not demand second chances
Supporter
Apr 5, 2003
6,713
469
47
Ohio
✟62,780.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
Allen2 said:
I too must admit that R.C. is excellent: I really enjoyed his book "Not A Chance" in refuting an evolutionary world view. I hear he has Calvinist leanings :) Your favorite Arminian, Al(who else?) :)

"Not a Chance" is a fantastic book. In fact I'm prone to quoting it in the General Apologetics forum when dealing with atheists.

And yes, Sproul is most definitely a five-pointer:)

In Him,
Fru
 
Upvote 0

Junior Sparagus

Active Member
Aug 28, 2003
80
2
52
Minneapolis
Visit site
✟15,220.00
Faith
Christian
It is, indeed, possible for an individual to reject God. It is not possible for an individual redeemed by Christ to be "unredeemed."

Because God is the Father, Son and Holy Spirit, it is impossible to reject one person of the Trinity without rejecting the other two. They are one.

Ouch, my brain broke. Trinitarian issues give me nosebleeds.

This, of course, is not to say that a person cannot "claim Christ" and then later "reject Him." My argument is that the person either was never redeemed, or is deceiving himself now about his state of rejection. This is not the same as what some people call "backsliding." Followers of Christ of every stripe all too often pour themselves into the mold of our culture and there are a number of them who dash after sin like it is going out of style (which it, in fact, is doing. Read Revelation if you don't believe me). But that is different than flat-out rejecting the gift of God's Son: it is more like taking advantage of it.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Gamecock

Regular Member
Oct 10, 2003
276
12
64
The Republic of Texas
Visit site
✟15,486.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Allen2 said:
I too must admit that R.C. is excellent: I really enjoyed his book "Not A Chance" in refuting an evolutionary world view. I hear he has Calvinist leanings :) Your favorite Arminian, Al(who else?) :)

R.C., A Calvinist? I'm shocked!

;)
 
Upvote 0

armothe

Living in HIS kingdom...
May 22, 2002
977
40
50
Visit site
✟16,561.00
Faith
Christian
Politics
US-Constitution
Allen2 said:
I too must admit that R.C. is excellent: I really enjoyed his book "Not A Chance" in refuting an evolutionary world view. I hear he has Calvinist leanings :) Your favorite Arminian, Al(who else?) :)
I hate to add to the "me too" posts but I love listening to RC despite a few doctrinal differences. He is very encouraging in the faith.

-A
 
Upvote 0

Axver

Dreaming on a railway track
Sep 4, 2003
2,904
180
37
Melbourne, Australia
Visit site
✟3,984.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
AU-Greens
Calvinism is one doctrine dealing with issues such as the state of man, predestination, and salvation. They are very much Christians, 'Calvinism' is simply a term used to signify a particular form of Biblical interpretation, and how do I know they're Christians? Because I'm a Christian and I subscribe to Calvinism.

And relating to the original topic, before I became a Christian, I was very much an atheist and would denounce and insult religion any chance I got. I don't think I ever uttered a word on the Holy Spirit, but I can't be sure, and sometimes I get a bit worried that I did actually blaspheme it before I became a Christian. So I'm always interested in discussions like these, to see what conclusions people have reached about what the verse on it being the unforgivable sin actually means.

I did once read something that said "if you're worried you did commit this sin, then you didn't" - do you think such a statement has any credibility or merit?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

appletree84

New Member
Jan 22, 2004
4
0
39
✟15,114.00
Faith
Christian
To have the fullness of the gospel of God in your life at a time, and then to totally deny it afterwards is to reject the Holy Ghost. This is the unpardonable sin. Murder falls shortly after as being very hard to recieve forgiveness for, this is followed by adultery (including sexual sin outside of marriage). Sexual sin is so serious because we are using our heavenly procreative powers unrighteously.
 
Upvote 0

thereselittleflower

Well-Known Member
Nov 9, 2003
34,832
1,526
✟50,355.00
Faith
Catholic
I hear so much about the Unpardonable sin . . and so much is incorrect . .


I have posted several times in other forums here about this sin because misconceptions abound . . it really challanges our way of thinking, and to not understand it creates unwarranted fear . .

I have always heard, that if you are at all afraid that you have committed it, you most definitely have NOT!

But I always wondered how could they be sure . .


Well, several years ago, I found out how . . and they were right . . if you are at all worried that you might have committed it, it is proof positive that you have not . .

How did I find out? Because I was confronted with it head on in the deepest, darkest night of my soul . . and I came within a hairs breadth of committing it . . . .


It is not unbelief . . it is not any other sin . . it is not unrepentence . .


You begin down the road to committing this sin by falsely attributing the work of the Holy Spirit to that of the devil . . that in and of itself is NOT the blasphemy of the Holy Spirit as people can be genuinely confused. . but even in that genuine confusion, you can begin down that path . . that is in part how I began down that path . . .


Look at the bible where Jesus speaks about the Unforgivable sin . . LOOK at the CONTEXT it is set in . . What had just happened with between Jesus and the Pharises ?

They had denounced Jesus by accusing Him of casting out demons by the power of Satan!! They had just attributed the power of the Holy Spirit to that of Satan!!


This sin is very specific . . and it cannot be committed by someone without them understanding exactly what they are doing . . it is committted with MALICE towards God and the Holy Spirit . . and you KNOW that if you cross that line, you can never come back . .


Pleaes believe me . . do not water this down, do not make it something it is not . .. read what Jesus said IN THE CONTEXT He said it in, and it will begin to become clear . .

But please be assured that if you are worried about IF you have committed it, you have NOT committed it!


Peace in Him!
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Puritan

Non-conformist
Jan 20, 2004
27
4
54
North Ga.
✟168.00
Faith
Non-Denom
>I always wondered whether when someone committed such a sin,does God still love them,even though they will never be forgiven,and are heading for hell?
For that matter,since God knows everything,He must know those that will commit the unforgivable sin,as well as those who will go to hell. Does He still love them anyway?
If so,what would be the point of it?
I'm sure God loves their souls,but I don't think He's too happy about their current condition,so why should we further justify their actions by our acceptance of them?
I suppose we should simply love those who come against us,but I don't feel we are called to seek these people out,unless God directs them to us,or vice-versa.
Corresponding with unbelievers can be a dangerous thing,and is not something we should be flippant about.
Any other thoughts on this?

~David


"Do not I hate them,O Lord,that hate thee? And am I not grieved with those that rise up against thee?
"I hate them with a perfect hatred:I count them mine enemies."

{Psalms-139:21-22}
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.