F
flyin high
Guest
http://www.cnsnews.com//ViewPolitics.asp?Page=\Politics\archive\200409\POL20040909d.html
linked from Drudge Report
linked from Drudge Report
LOL!!!!!Firscherscherling said:Um, correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't the White House produce copies of some of this documentation themselves?
I had an old typewriter as a kid that had common superscripts ('th' and 'st' for example).But the use of the superscript "th" in one document - "111th F.I.S" - gave each expert pause. They said that is an automatic feature found in current versions of Microsoft Word, and it's not something that was even possible more than 30 years ago.
"It was highly out of the ordinary for an organization, even the Air Force, to have proportional-spaced fonts for someone to work with," said Allan Haley, director of words and letters at Agfa Monotype in Wilmington, Mass. "I'm suspect in that I did work for the U.S. Army as late as the late 1980s and early 1990s and the Army was still using [fixed-pitch typeface] Courier."
Hang on a sec. . Before you get all excited.. Don't get your undies in a knot just yet lolStarscream said:Introducing the IBM Selectric Typewriter.
Released in 1961 it had special features including variable pitch fonts and superscripts (subscripts too!).
Those "experts" cited in the OP are a complete joke. It took me all of 5 minutes to find this.
Would you mind addressing my post? You got all excited and started wiggin' out, but I would be interested to see where you are getting your facts from. You presented it as fact that these machines have these capabilities, but not even the webpage you presented as "evidence" supports your claims.Starscream said:Keep it coming guys, I'm sure this will all get straightened out in a couple of days once all the excitement and hack detective work dies out.
Looks like the conservative bloggers are in a dizzy over this. How much you want to bet they challenged the SBVFT claims as much?
Hold on a second. I'm want to see some more claims. Just keep them coming.drfeelgood said:Would you mind addressing my post?
Ok. I'll be waiting patiently and see what develops. I'll look forward to your response. You might like to address dittomonkey's post while you're at it.Starscream said:Hold on a second. I'm want to see some more claims. Just keep them coming.
I will. It just shows you guys will take any claims as "facts". Keep them coming.drfeelgood said:Ok. I'll be waiting patiently and see what develops. I'll look forward to your response. You might like to address dittomonkey's post while you're at it.
I would like to see where either myself or Dr. Feelgood said anything of the sort. All either of us said was that it was interesting.I will. It just shows you guys will take any claims as "facts". Keep them coming.
How can I reproduce the same results? I've got all the needed software.dittomonkey911 said:An Animation of the Docs.