OK, here is what I don't understand about the gay clergy issue

Nelzador

At the music heist, I met the gourmet man with alu
Jan 1, 2003
835
0
Away
✟976.00
sweetkitty said:
Jesus was silent on many sexual sins including pedophilia and rape..should we ordain ministers who engage in these acts simply because Jesus failed to condemn them in the New Testament?

Interesting choice of words. Are you saying Jesus was a failiure i.e. not perfect?
 
Upvote 0

Michael0701

Harley Ridin' Believer!!
Nov 13, 2002
719
6
63
Tax Free Delaware!!
Visit site
✟8,417.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Nelzador said:
Interesting choice of words. Are you saying Jesus was a failiure i.e. not perfect?

Kitty has not appointed me as her official spokesperson, but we both know that's not what she meant. Come on now :(


And a belated thanks to Wols for the followup article. Time and time again it is proved that many an inflamatory article or news report needs to run it's course before the WHOLE truth comes out.
 
Upvote 0

crazyfingers

Well-Known Member
May 17, 2002
8,733
329
Massachusetts
Visit site
✟18,923.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
sweetkitty said:
Jesus was silent on many sexual sins including pedophilia and rape..should we ordain ministers who engage in these acts simply because Jesus failed to condemn them in the New Testament?
God gave us common sense and the ability to know right from wrong. Ordaining a man who knowingly engages in a sinful way of life is a stumbling block to other Christians and is leading people straight down the path to Hell,IMO

You need to learn to differentiate between actions that have victims and those that do not. Equating homosexuality with pedophilia and rape is completely inappropriate.
 
Upvote 0

KennySe

Habemus Papam!
Aug 6, 2003
5,450
253
59
Visit site
✟14,554.00
Faith
Catholic
Greetings, all. Just popping in to share today's artcle with you.

http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/europe/08/08/anglican.meeting/index.html

Here's a clip.

The Archbishop of Canterbury: ""It seems to me rather sad, and rather revealing, that when it comes to sex we suddenly become much less intelligent about our reading of the Bible," Williams told the BBC late last year.

"If the Bible is very clear -- as I think it is -- that a heterosexual indulging in homosexual activity for the sake of variety and gratification is not following the will of God, does that automatically say that that is the only sort of homosexual activity there could ever be?

"My own personal conclusion is that I can see a case for acknowledging faithful same-sex relationships," he added.
 
Upvote 0

Nelzador

At the music heist, I met the gourmet man with alu
Jan 1, 2003
835
0
Away
✟976.00
Michael0701 said:
Kitty has not appointed me as her official spokesperson, but we both know that's not what she meant. Come on now :(

"Jesus failed" - Why didn't he condemn the acts Kitty mentioned? Why didn't he condemn men marrying young girls in that period?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

kdet

God lives in us
Jul 12, 2003
7,541
256
61
TX
Visit site
✟16,807.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
crazyfingers said:
You need to learn to differentiate between actions that have victims and those that do not. Equating homosexuality with pedophilia and rape is completely inappropriate.

No it is not..they are sexual sins.
 
Upvote 0

Vance

Contributor
Jul 16, 2003
6,666
262
58
✟23,260.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Dayton, you call yourself a new Christian. One of the things you need to look into is the idea that sin is sin. It is not a sin because we can see a victim or track the specific harm involved. If the Scripture says we are not to do it, then we are not to do it. Period.

There are no "degrees" of sin. Even a sin which we see as inconsequential will lead to destruction if it is done without repentance. This goes for anger, pride, gluttony, etc, etc, etc, so we should not be overly-focused on sexual sins. But sexual sins do exist, and homosexuality is one of them. If a person chooses an ongoing lifestyle which includes such sinful activity, they are doing it unrepentently and this will ultimately lead to an eternity in Hell (to be blunt).

You either accept God's Word as law or you do not.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

kdet

God lives in us
Jul 12, 2003
7,541
256
61
TX
Visit site
✟16,807.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Vance said:
Dayton, you call yourself a new Christian. One of the things you need to look into is the idea that sin is sin. It is not a sin because we can see a victim or track the specific harm involved. If the Scripture says we are not to do it, then we are not to do it. Period.

There are no "degrees" of sin. Even a sin which we see as inconsequential will lead to destruction if it is done without repentance. This goes for anger, pride, gluttony, etc, etc, etc, so we should not be overly-focused on sexual sins. But sexual sins do exist, and homosexuality is one of them. If a person chooses an ongoing lifestyle which includes such sinful activity, they are doing it unrepentently and this will ultimately lead to an eternity in Hell (to be blunt).

You either accept God's Word as law or you do not.

Another excellent post! :clap:
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

fragmentsofdreams

Critical loyalist
Apr 18, 2002
10,339
431
20
CA
Visit site
✟28,828.00
Faith
Catholic
Vance said:
Dayton, you call yourself a new Christian. One of the things you need to look into is the idea that sin is sin. It is not a sin because we can see a victim or track the specific harm involved. If the Scripture says we are not to do it, then we are not to do it. Period.

There are no "degrees" of sin. Even a sin which we see as inconsequential will lead to destruction if it is done without repentance. This goes for anger, pride, gluttony, etc, etc, etc, so we should not be overly-focused on sexual sins. But sexual sins do exist, and homosexuality is one of them. If a person chooses an ongoing lifestyle which includes such sinful activity, they are doing it unrepentently and this will ultimately lead to an eternity in Hell (to be blunt).

You either accept God's Word as law or you do not.

God is not an arbitrary dictator whose decrees are based on nothing more that a whim. Things are a sin because of a reason. By understanding we can better conform ourselves to God's will. Furthermore, if a Biblical prohibition does not seem to fit into our understanding, it is an indication that our understanding of God's reasons or our interpretation of the Bible are flawed.
 
Upvote 0