Annoying anti-Catholic ignorance grrrr...

Status
Not open for further replies.

Hoonbaba

Catholic Preterist
Apr 15, 2002
1,941
55
43
New Jersey, USA
Visit site
✟10,659.00
Faith
Catholic
It's interesting how there's a few testimonies, one by a Catholic priest who clearly didn't understand his faith correctly. And this, sadly, is a problem I see with lots of Catholics. They have a 'different' understanding of Catholicism, and so outwardly, there's little or no real devotion to Christ.

Now the big question is: How do we get people to realize that Christ is someone we can experience on a daily basis, like one example being the Eucharist??

-Jason
 
Upvote 0

Papist

Hannah and Rowan's Dad
Jul 13, 2003
1,722
44
54
Hamilton, Waikato
✟17,114.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
The Early Church Fathers (Ignatius, Polycarp, Clement, the Didache, and Barnabus) taught doctrine and defended Christianity against heresies. In doing this, their sole appeal for authority was Scripture. Their writings literally breathe with the spirit of the Old and New Testaments. In the writings of the apologists such as Justin martyr and Athenagoras the same thing is found. There is no appeal in any of these writings, to the authority of Tradition as a separate and independent body of revelation.

According to that site, the Didache was an "Early Church Father"!!! Hehehehe!!!

http://www.christiananswers.net/q-eden/sola-scriptura-earlychurch.html
 
Upvote 0

Papist

Hannah and Rowan's Dad
Jul 13, 2003
1,722
44
54
Hamilton, Waikato
✟17,114.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Hoonbaba said:
It's interesting how there's a few testimonies, one by a Catholic priest who clearly didn't understand his faith correctly. And this, sadly, is a problem I see with lots of Catholics. They have a 'different' understanding of Catholicism, and so outwardly, there's little or no real devotion to Christ.

Now the big question is: How do we get people to realize that Christ is someone we can experience on a daily basis, like one example being the Eucharist??

-Jason

I guess lively faith is caught rather than taught.

I will ponder that one ...
 
Upvote 0

Papist

Hannah and Rowan's Dad
Jul 13, 2003
1,722
44
54
Hamilton, Waikato
✟17,114.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Hoonbaba said:
It's interesting how there's a few testimonies, one by a Catholic priest who clearly didn't understand his faith correctly. And this, sadly, is a problem I see with lots of Catholics. They have a 'different' understanding of Catholicism, and so outwardly, there's little or no real devotion to Christ.

Now the big question is: How do we get people to realize that Christ is someone we can experience on a daily basis, like one example being the Eucharist??

-Jason

Sheesh, the Church is a powerful organisation, and falls prey to the temptations of power. It does seem all too easy for the organisational and ritual aspects of the Church to become divorced from the spiritual reality at the centre.

The form of self-salvation that priest got into seems more like Buddhism to me.

It is so painful that there are so many within the Church who miss the point.
 
Upvote 0

Hoonbaba

Catholic Preterist
Apr 15, 2002
1,941
55
43
New Jersey, USA
Visit site
✟10,659.00
Faith
Catholic
Upvote 0

Papist

Hannah and Rowan's Dad
Jul 13, 2003
1,722
44
54
Hamilton, Waikato
✟17,114.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Hoonbaba said:
Yea...even Judas was with Jesus for 3 years and it seems he didn't learn much from the 'master'.

Perhaps prayer does the trick =)

-Jason

I can see how it happens. For a person with a deep faith and understanding of the Church's teachings, the sacraments are a means of grace. However, his children might get the idea that the sacraments are magic tricks that get you into heaven. There are no guarantees that our children will share our personal faith and then the sacramentality of our faith just becomes shallow ritual to them.

The things of the Church only make sense in a context of personal faith.
 
Upvote 0

jukesk9

Dixie Whistlin' Papist
Feb 7, 2002
4,046
83
52
Arkansas
Visit site
✟13,223.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I can't remember what site it was but I got upset once at the blatant misrepresentation of the Church's teachings so I e-mailed the webmaster and we got into an e-mail debate. This was a few years ago. He never changed anything......
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Hoonbaba

Catholic Preterist
Apr 15, 2002
1,941
55
43
New Jersey, USA
Visit site
✟10,659.00
Faith
Catholic
Papist said:
The things of the Church only make sense in a context of personal faith.

Yea, when I was a protestant, the whole 'ritual' aspect of Catholicism really turned me off, especially when I come across those Catholics who simply go with the flow.

Protestants seem to emphasize the personal faith, but at the same time, that's all they emphasize. I guess personal faith is where it begins, but sacramentalism is where the personal faith expands into something greater??

-Jason
 
Upvote 0

Papist

Hannah and Rowan's Dad
Jul 13, 2003
1,722
44
54
Hamilton, Waikato
✟17,114.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Hoonbaba said:
Protestants seem to emphasize the personal faith, but at the same time, that's all they emphasize. I guess personal faith is where it begins, but sacramentalism is where the personal faith expands into something greater??

-Jason

That's a good way to put it ... and we should be teaching our kids about our personal faith alongside our sacramental faith, and emphasising that the two go together.
 
Upvote 0

Bastoune

Well-Known Member
Jul 14, 2003
1,283
47
50
New York, NY, USA
✟1,694.00
Faith
Catholic
Hoonbaba said:
By the way, it looks like Dave Armstrong wrote a bunch that refutes that claim that the early Fathers taught sola scriptura. And it was posted on his site a few days ago, how convenient =)

http://ic.net/~erasmus/RAZ122.HTM

-Jason


This one by Patrick Madrid is also PRICELESS:

http://www.ewtn.com/library/SCRIPTUR/SOLASCRI.txt

Here's another one... ya know, it's amazing what people will do to twist reality to fit their own warped perceptions:

http://www.catholicdefender.com/Apologetics/Protestantism/nashss.htm

What is more, since Protestantism is all relative, based on how one interprets the Holy Bible for oneself, who's to say who is correct, and who's got the authority to tell the Catholics they are wrong when technically, we've got "just as much probability" of being right as they do... :sigh:

That's not God's plan people!!!
 
Upvote 0

Bastoune

Well-Known Member
Jul 14, 2003
1,283
47
50
New York, NY, USA
✟1,694.00
Faith
Catholic
My friend told me about some book called THE DA VINCI CODE (a conspiracy theory novel) where someone discovers that the Catholic Church is profoundly sinister. Hmmmmm......it's just the latest incarnation of Catholic conspiracy theories, along w/many others. The sad thing is that many people read FICTION as if it were TRUTH. LEFT BEHIND is an example of this.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Filia Mariae

Senior Contributor
Jul 27, 2003
8,228
734
USA
Visit site
✟11,996.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
The Early Church Fathers (Ignatius, Polycarp, Clement, the Didache, and Barnabus) taught doctrine and defended Christianity against heresies. In doing this, their sole appeal for authority was Scripture...There is no appeal in any of these writings, to the authority of Tradition as a separate and independent body of revelation.


:rolleyes: :eek: Uh-huh, riiiiight.

"It is necessary to obey those who are the presbyters in the Church, those who as we have shown, have succession from the Apostles; those who have received, with the succession of the episcopate, the sure charism of truth according to the good pleasure of the Father."
St Irenaeus


"Polycarp, however, was instructed not only by the Apostles, and conversed with many who had seen Christ, but was also appointed bishop of the Church in Smyrna, by the Apostles in Asia. I saw him in my early youth; for he tarried a long time, and when quite old he departed this life in a glorious and most noble martyrdom. He always taught those things which he had learned from the Apostles, and the Church had handed down, and which are true. To these things all the Churches in Asia bear witness, as do also the successors of Polycarp even to the present time."
St Irenaeus


:priest: :clap: :bow:
 
Upvote 0

Bastoune

Well-Known Member
Jul 14, 2003
1,283
47
50
New York, NY, USA
✟1,694.00
Faith
Catholic
The Early Church Fathers (Ignatius, Polycarp, Clement, the Didache, and Barnabus) taught doctrine and defended Christianity against heresies. In doing this, their sole appeal for authority was Scripture. Their writings literally breathe with the spirit of the Old and New Testaments. In the writings of the apologists such as Justin martyr and Athenagoras the same thing is found. There is no appeal in any of these writings, to the authority of Tradition as a separate and independent body of revelation.

Like you said, Carly:

"Since therefore we have such proofs, it is not necessary to seek the truth among others which it is easy to obtain from the Church; since the apostles, like a rich man [depositing his money] in a bank, lodged in her hands most copiously all things pertaining to the truth: so that every man, whosoever will, can draw from her the water of life. For she is the entrance to life; all others are thieves and robbers. On this account are we bound to avoid them, but to make choice of the thing pertaining to the Church with the utmost diligence, and to lay hold of the tradition of the truth. For how stands the case? Suppose there arise a dispute relative to some important question among us, should we not have recourse to the most ancient Churches with which the apostles held constant intercourse, and learn from them what is certain and clear in regard to the present question? For how should it be if the apostles themselves had not left us writings? Would it not be necessary, [in that case,] to follow the course of the tradition which they handed down to those to whom they did commit the Churches?

"To which course many nations of those barbarians who believe in Christ do assent, having salvation written in their hearts by the Spirit, without paper or ink, and, carefully preserving the ancient tradition, believing in one God, the Creator of heaven and earth, and all things therein, by means of Christ Jesus, the Son of God; who, because of His surpassing love towards His creation, condescended to be born of the virgin, He Himself uniting man through Himself to God, and having suffered under Pontius Pilate, and rising again, and having been received up in splendour, shall come in glory, the Saviour of those who are saved, and the Judge of those who are judged, and sending into eternal fire those who transform the truth, and despise His Father and His advent. Those who, in the absence of written documents, have believed this faith, are barbarians, so far as regards our language; but as regards doctrine, manner, and tenor of life, they are, because of faith, very wise indeed; and they do please God, ordering their conversation in all righteousness, chastity, and wisdom. If any one were to preach to these men the inventions of the heretics, speaking to them in their own language, they would at once stop their ears, and flee as far off as possible, not enduring even to listen to the blasphemous address. Thus, by means of that ancient tradition of the apostles, they do not suffer their mind to conceive anything of the [doctrines suggested by the] portentous language of these teachers, among whom neither Church nor doctrine has ever been established."

- Irenaeus, "Against the Heresies" (Book 3, Chapter 4)
 
Upvote 0
Typical Protestant trash(nothing against any Protestants who monitor this forum). The Virgin Mary was not a sinner, she was born without original sin, something even Jesus had to have baptized away! And whe do not treat her as an idol, that is an unfair stereotype of Catholic worship
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

SoldierofChrist

Modern Reformationist
Mar 3, 2003
572
5
42
PA
✟767.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Typical Protestant trash

Protestants seem to emphasize the personal faith, but at the same time, that's all they emphasize.

Astounding. I hear cries and complaints from the Roman Catholics on this particular discussion forum talk about how they are ridiculed and such by Protestants and non-Christians, yet all I see is threads such as this that promote anti-Protestantism. Interesting. Isn't there a rule against this?
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.