Except Christ is heir to David's Throne, and so are you saying there is a rival to Jesus for the Throne of David?
Jeff the Finn
Jeff the Finn
Upvote
0
duster1az said:Jesaiah writes: "What oath?"
The Abrahamic covenant records Jehovah's sovereign purpose in, through, and for Abraham. The covenant is unconditional in that no obligation is imposed on Abraham; he contributes nothing, but is the recipient of all that Jehovah proposes to do for him (Gen. 12:1-3; 13:14-17; 15:4-7; 17:1-8).
The Davidic covenant reveals the nature of the literal earthly kingdom (2 Sam. 7:12-17, Ps. 89:1-37). The literal nature of the covenant is both explicit and extended. Difficulty only comes about when some are determined to metamorphose a literal, earthly kingdom into some vague and totally imaginary spiritual idealism.
In Christ,
Tracey
jeffthefinn said:The promise made to Israel was fulfilled in Christ, that is the gist of the cursing of the fig trees they did not bear fruit. St Paul calls the Church the Israel of God, I do not know of another Israel.
Jeff the Finn
duster1az said:Jeffthefinn writes: "It doesn't offend me that you disagree with my study of the Bible from a dispensational point of view. I believe it must be studied in this way to avoid confusion and to have continuity.
jeffthefinn writes: "In the thread the Scofield Reference Bible in the Protestant, Reformed, and Evangelical Room there is my comment about at least some of what Scofield taught. Is that what you also believe that the Sermon on the Mount does not apply to the Church?"
I don't own a Scofield Bible, so I can't respond to what it states, but I believe the Sermon on the Mount is the expansion of the full meaning of the personal righteousness that is required in the literal kingdom. But, just because I believe the literal interpretation of the Sermon was addressed to Israel in anticipation of their earthly kingdom, it doesn't mean I believe the Church can't benefit from portions of it through a secondary application.
In Christ,
Tracey
Jesaiah said:The Bible clearly states that God's land covenant with Abraham has been fulfilled (cf. Joshua 21:43).
A Brethren IN CHRIST said:Joshua 21:43 And the Lord Gave unto Israel all the land which he sware to give unto their fathers; and they possessed it and dwelt therein.
I like Challenges with scripture thanks
First the SECOND PROMISE
Gen 12:5 .........and they went forth to go into the land of Canaan; anto the land of Canaan they came 6 And Abram passed through the land unto the place of Sichem, unto the plain of Moreh. And the Canaanite was then in the land. 7 And the Lord appeared unto Abram, and said , unto thy seed will I give this land and there builded he an alter unto the Lord, who appeared unto him.
This promise fulfilled in Joshau 21:43
The #1 Covenant
Gen 15:18 In the same day the Lord made a covenant with Abram, saying, Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river , the river Euphrates: 19 The Kenites, and the Kenizzites, and the Kadmonites, 20 and the HHittites, and the Perizzites, and the Rephaims, 21 And the Amorites, and the Canaanites, and the Girga*****s, and the Jebusites.
This Covenant has not been fulfilled
Far West as the Nile ,Far east to the Ephrates, North and south according to where these tribes resided
Nice try
differences are important in contracts
can't say I'm Jordan and get his PAYCHECK since I play basketball
Jesaiah said:Please leave the sarcasm at the door If you want to discuss Scripture in a polite manner than let's do so. But if it is going to boil down to cheap shots then for both our edification lets not continue this discussion.
With that said, if we use your approach in interpreting the Abrahamic land promises then we end up with not just two land covenants but four. God gives similar land promises to Abraham in Genesis 12:7; 13:15; 15:18; 17:8. So do we have one covenant in different passages with different summations or descriptions of the land (either more detailed or less) or do we have several different covenants that involve the same area of land but each covenant being different from the other?
God Bless
Jesaiah
jeffthefinn said:Except Christ is heir to David's Throne, and so are you saying there is a rival to Jesus for the Throne of David?
Jeff the Finn
duster1az said:Jesaiah writes: "The Bible clearly states that God's land covenant with Abraham has been fulfilled (cf. Joshua 21:43)."
Seems I've heard this argument before, but you never responded to my answer. See below for previous post.
Jesaiah writes: "The Abrahamic land covenant was fulfilled. (cf. Joshua 21:43-45)"
In light of her unchangeable covenants, it's essential that Israel's dispossession of the land be recognized. In doing so we should understand that these dispossessions also involve regatherings. There were clear predictions of three dispersions and three regatherings. As of the present time Israel is now scattered in her third and final dispersion awaiting the last regathering.
Predicted dispersions: (1) Into Egypt (Gen. 15:13-16). The reurn of the nation to the land under the leadership of Moses and Joshua (Joshua 21:43-45) marks the end of the first dispersion. (2) The Captivities (Jer. 25:11-12). The bondage ended seventy years after the southern kingdom was taken captive, but still not all that were taken returned. The important fact is that a representation of the whole nation was reassembled in the land. Daniel learned from the Jerimiah passage when the time of bondage would be fulfilled (Dan. 9:1-2). (3) Present Dispersion (Neh. 1:8; Jer. 9:16, 18:15-17; Ezek. 12:14-15). The present dispersion exceeds the others in duration and in the manner in which Israel is now scattered among all nations. From the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 A.D. the scattering continues to this hour.
That Israel will yet be fully returned to her land is one of the Bible's greatest predictions (Deut. 30:1-3; Ezek. 37:21-28). It must be accepted in its literal form or be ignored completely. Too often the latter is done.
In Christ,
Tracey
Jesaiah said:So unless Jews believe upon Christ then they won't enter into the land again. The issues brought up in Romans 9-11 correspond to this discussion but right now I don't have the time to do so.
As for Ezekiel 37 I will have to discuss that later as I must go to Church.
God Bless
Jesaiah
Jesaiah said:I do not look to a Secret Rapture, nor a literal 1000 year reign but rather I look to Christ's Second Advent in which He comes to Judge the World and at such time He will call His chosen people to enter into eternal rest.
A book that has been helping me in understanding amillenialism is "A Case for Amillenialsm: Understanding End Times" by Dr. Kim Riddlebarger. And another book I am looking at is "The Bible and the Future" by Anthony A. Hoekema .
God Bless
Jesaiah
A couple of books I found helpful were Amillennialism Today, by William E. Cox and his study of dispensationalism. An Examination of Dispensationalismrnmomof7 said:I have read another book by Hoekema He is easy to read.
Like you I await the return of the King of Kings and Lord of Lords to come in Judgment. Marantha