Gay Anglican bishop steps down for unity.

Yahweh Nissi

"The LORD Is My Banner"
Mar 26, 2003
902
34
41
Birkenhead, on the Wirral.
✟1,240.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
Praise God :clap:

There has been a big bust up in the Anglican church in the past few weeks when an openly gay bishop was appointed in the diocese of Oxfordshire. It was threatening to split the church, but yesterday he stepped down to preserve unity. Evangelicals have been praying for this, but we did not expect it to happen, at least without more serious confrontation, so praise God for brinning this about.

I am sure he is a good and Godly man, but I belive the Bible is clearly against homosexual relationships, without being a 'fundamentalist', and I believe the leaders of the Anglican church (or any church!) should uphold this. At the 1998 Lambeth conference this position was clearly affirmed by the leaders of the Anglican church worldwide and this view of scripture is clear in the founding 39 articles of the Church of England, particularly 6 and 20.

It is a shame that evangelicals seem to be defined by this issue. A stand needed to be made, but there are more important things, especially bishops, or any leaders, that do not belive in a literal resurection. This is a gospel issue, made blantantly clear throughout the NT and is directly stated in article 4. If people do not agree with this, fine, but they should not be curch leaders.
 

SUNSTONE

Christian Warrior
Sep 2, 2002
8,785
213
49
Cocoa Village
Visit site
✟18,200.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Volos said:
I feel rather sorry for him.

It’s a pity the Anglicans couldn’t get over their bigotry and actually attempt to judge the man on his merits instead of their prejudice.

What if a pastor was having sex with prostitutes? Would you want him to lead the congregation?

The Christian way, is those who work for it deserve it. Like a football team, the best players will start. Because usually the best players, worked harder, and want to win more. Being a pastor is a tough job, alot of responsiblity goes into it. So I would want the most qualified person for the job. That includes the ones that resist temtation the best.

I am glad that the congregation is standing up for what is right.I would leave that church in a heart beat! I would probably leave that church, if they even tought about making that decission.
 
Upvote 0

The Midge

Towel Bearer
Jun 25, 2003
3,166
166
55
UK
Visit site
✟11,951.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I don't think there is anything to chear about in this sorry saga. Evangelicals have been forced to take a stand and the most vocal and homophobic have been to the fore grabbing the media headlines.

The message that gays have no place in the church has been broadcast. Remember our saviour dined with tax collectors and sinners. The issue should have been about suitablility for church leadership not does God love gays nor whether there is a place for gays in church ministry.
 
Upvote 0

kiwimac

Bishop of the See of Aotearoa ROCCNZ;Theologian
Site Supporter
May 14, 2002
14,986
1,519
63
New Zealand
Visit site
✟591,918.00
Country
New Zealand
Faith
Utrecht
Marital Status
Married
Politics
AU-Greens
This is simply unacceptable! THis man is called of God and because some so-called Christians can not see beyond their own prejudices and bigotries he has to stand down.

Man I despise fundamentalists!

Kiwimac
 
Upvote 0

SUNSTONE

Christian Warrior
Sep 2, 2002
8,785
213
49
Cocoa Village
Visit site
✟18,200.00
Faith
Non-Denom
kiwimac said:
This is simply unacceptable! THis man is called of God and because some so-called Christians can not see beyond their own prejudices and bigotries he has to stand down.

Man I despise fundamentalists!

Kiwimac

How do you know they were called by God?
 
Upvote 0

SUNSTONE

Christian Warrior
Sep 2, 2002
8,785
213
49
Cocoa Village
Visit site
✟18,200.00
Faith
Non-Denom
The Midge said:
I don't think there is anything to chear about in this sorry saga. Evangelicals have been forced to take a stand and the most vocal and homophobic have been to the fore grabbing the media headlines.

The message that gays have no place in the church has been broadcast. Remember our saviour dined with tax collectors and sinners. The issue should have been about suitablility for church leadership not does God love gays nor whether there is a place for gays in church ministry.

People who who live the gay lifestyle are most certianly welcomed in churchs. But to be a leader, I believe they need to give up that lifestyle.

That reminds me, I have a gay coworker, I haven't bashed him in a few days. Let me get my kkk uniform on :priest: and go nail some burning crosses on his lawn! :D

JUST KIDDING! :p
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Yahweh Nissi

"The LORD Is My Banner"
Mar 26, 2003
902
34
41
Birkenhead, on the Wirral.
✟1,240.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
Kiwimac, would you please not suggest that those opposed to this appointment are not Christians (by calling us 'so-called Christians'). I in no way suggested that Jeffry (the one who stepped down) was not a Christian, and indeed made sure I said I thought he was a Godly man so that no one would mistake me. I, and most of the Anglicans who opposed his appointment, are not fundamentalists anyway but you should not 'despise' any of your fellow Christians. I disagree with both with fundamentalists and liberals but they are all my brothers and sisters and I love them.

Midge, I agree that the whole thing has not been something to cheer about, but it had looked like the confrontation was going to get a whole lot worse, possibly splitting the church, and I was praising God that this did not happen. Of course Jesus dinned with tax collectors and sinners, the church should be open to and reach out to all people, and it is a shame that this episode will probably make that harder in some ways, but this was not about that. It was about, as you say it should have been, wether someone was suitible for church leadership. Jesus would not have supported making a tax collector a church leader unless they had stopped swindling people and repented of their actions. 1 Timothy chapter 3 sets out pretty high standards for a church leader. Obedience to scripture and holy living are important, and whilst I know liberals would say that a faithful gay relationship does not contravene this, the 1998 Lambeth conference stated that it did.

With love in Christ,
YN.
 
Upvote 0

kiwimac

Bishop of the See of Aotearoa ROCCNZ;Theologian
Site Supporter
May 14, 2002
14,986
1,519
63
New Zealand
Visit site
✟591,918.00
Country
New Zealand
Faith
Utrecht
Marital Status
Married
Politics
AU-Greens
Blessed-One

Tell me, What respect were my fellow-Christians showing to the Bishop they forced to stand down? What compassion were they showing him? And why is it inappropriate for me and not for them also?

Kiwimac
 
Upvote 0

TrinityHerself

Active Member
Jul 1, 2003
39
5
43
Hogwarts
Visit site
✟15,197.00
Faith
Methodist
Politics
US-Democrat
I think this news is very sad. I think it's horrible that he not only felt this pressure but sacrificed his integrity because he was willing to "preserve" unity in the church.

I don't think the comment about prostitutes is equally valid. Gay people don't necessarily pay people for money or sleep around - for all we know (and someone may know better than I) - this bishop could have had a clean, long-term, one person relationship with another man that didn't involve molesting children. This is way more likely than the alternative; too bad these nice homosexual people don't make it on the news as often... :(
 
Upvote 0

Nelzador

At the music heist, I met the gourmet man with alu
Jan 1, 2003
835
0
Away
✟976.00
Yahweh Nissi said:
It is a shame that evangelicals seem to be defined by this issue. A stand needed to be made, but there are more important things, especially bishops, or any leaders, that do not belive in a literal resurection. This is a gospel issue, made blantantly clear throughout the NT and is directly stated in article 4. If people do not agree with this, fine, but they should not be curch leaders.

This is the good thing about being atheist. You don't have to worry about this kind of nonsense.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Nelzador

At the music heist, I met the gourmet man with alu
Jan 1, 2003
835
0
Away
✟976.00
Well the wider issue is those that believe themselves to be gay and perhaps believers in God will abandon there search and any hopes the Gay-to-Straight Brigade have of converting will be gone. Of course, it won't be anyone's fault other than the gays... Isn't it nifty how homophobia has replaced racism so easily to many Christians? I wonder if in 50 years, Christians will be saying homophobia was overrated..?
 
Upvote 0

afnospam

Active Member
Jun 30, 2003
72
0
✟182.00
Faith
Anglican
As an Epicopalian, I struggled with this nomination. Here we have a member of the clergy freely giving up his homosexual relationship as part of his call to pastoral service. He is to be commended for his choice to refrain. However, I was still bothered by the fact that he still lives with his partner in a comitted, although celibate, relationship. If we had a hertosexual pastor who continued to live with his female lover in a celibate relationship, I believe the Church would agree it kept an apperance if impropriety and take disciplinary action - never would they be nominated for an evelated post. In the ratification of the preface of the 1789 BCP, it is written, "it is hoped the whole will be received and examined by every true member of our Church, and every sincere Christian, with a meek, candid, and charitable frame of mind; without prejudice or prepossessions; seriously considering what Christianity is, and what the truths of the Gospel are; and earnestly beseeching Almighty God to accompany with his blessing every endeavour for promulgating them to mankind in the clearest,
plainest, most affecting and majestic manner, for the sake of Jesus Christ, our blessed Lord and Saviour." Such actions as a Priest living together with their lover or partner require examination as to if they meet the above.

+
 
Upvote 0

Top Cat

Active Member
Jul 2, 2003
31
2
47
Aberdeen
Visit site
✟15,161.00
Faith
Christian
kiwimac said:
Blessed-One

Tell me, What respect were my fellow-Christians showing to the Bishop they forced to stand down? What compassion were they showing him? And why is it inappropriate for me and not for them also?

Kiwimac

Hi Kiwimac, I was really interested in your quote that you have at the bottom of your posts and it made me laugh(if I was interpreting it right) as it is contradictory to your views on this issue. I took it as meaning that God is not some sort of social club but a pointer to the right kind of life. Is that right? if so then we should all acknowledge that the church is the people of God. It is not a building and it is certainly not a social club. However we may know this, many do not see it that way and to society, the 'church' is just one more organisation that has to be dragged kicking and screaming into the twentyfirst century.

Homosexuals bashing the church about discrimination and the like may seem fair and up to date with todays lifestyles, but it is entirely innapropriate. The church is not an association or club like the golf clubs where for years women barraged for rights to attendance. It is not a school where afro-americans worked so hard to get rights to along with white people. (I must say I had to laugh at the poster who said that years from now christians would see homophobia as over rated-those people used the bible to prove their point and once they found their point no matter how obscure they clung to it-had they looked further they would have realised that we are all one in christ Jesus, all races and all sexes). The church is a people of God whose beliefs lie within the new testament. Those beliefs for the majority of christians say that homosexuality is a sin, not a special sin, just an other sin which has become part of imperfect nature. And like all sin it has to be offered up to God.

If you don't belief that homosexuality is a sin, then how can you ask forgiveness and if you have not asked, recieved forgiveness and repented then how can a person be saved? There are many who claim that all the verses pertaining to homosexuality are out of context and are mis-interpreted. If this is true, and homosexuality is not wrong, just like Paul talks about in Romans, that eating certain meat is not wrong, then that person who is of stronger faith should not be flaunting this in front of those with weaker faith. Because if that person causes a weaker brother or sister to lose faith their punishment will me terrible indeed. Also if they cause a person to commit a homosexual act by this reasoning when the person's conscience is against it, they have caused that person to sin. Romans ch 14. You will say when you read this, that if homosexuality is okey then other christians should not look down apon them and this would be correct and is correct for it is for God to judge.

However to the point of the gay bishop(I thought i'd never get there). He has not said sorry for his gay relationship, which means he believes it is okey. Presuming(and I do mean that)that homosexuality is not an actual sin, many christians believe it is wrong. This would come under Paul's description of weaker brothers and sisters. This means that the bishop should not flaunt the fact that he has openly gay relationships and neither should he attempt to persuade a person who is gay but has a conscience about it to go against his conscience and have a gay relationship. These two things would cause weaker brothers and sisters to lose faith and for others to sin against their conscience(which Romans says is essentially sinning against God and would be condemned for not acting in faith before God).

See wot a bloomin mess i'm in now, i've got myself well confused. In short I think its a good thing that he stepped down. It does not mean that Jesus Christ and his church hate gay people, but believing something is wrong does not mean that you hate the people who do it. Love the sinner hate the sin. I think a lot of people have forgotton that. We all think murder is wrong, yet God welcomes those who repent, and many of our beloved bible characters were murderers such as Moses and Paul. If we say that murder is wrong are we bigotted and predjudiced against murderers. Are we saying that Jesus or the church do not love them as ones desired to come and receive salvation(more likely we would be bashed for thinking murder is okey cause we love the sinner and hate the sin, how hypocritical. Jesus was slandered for the same thing).

Before I finish this post I just want to say that if anyone starts on me for comparing murder with homosexuality, then don't bother. I know they are not the same thing. I am simply comparing one christian belief of sin with another, so relax.

Also I apologise in advance for anyone offended by my post(or just bored cause its sooooooooo long) but I think I covered everything I wanted to say and even acknowledged that homosexuality may not be a sin(although in my conscience it is). Its so confusing now cause scholars like to prod and poke everything and if a belief is not to their liking they do their best to prove that its a misquote, so that we don't know what's what anymore. I think Romans is a really good chapter though for insight into how we should be in the chuch, gay or straight.

Top Cat
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

SirKenin

Contributor
Jun 26, 2003
6,518
526
from the deepest inner mind to the outer limits
✟9,370.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Hmmm... This doesn't seem to be that tough a call. You can scream homophobia, gay rights, or whatever you want, but it seems based on what little knowledge I have of the Bible, that the issue is clear.

Do you set a wolf to guard over a flock of sheep? When I'm talking wolf, of course, I'm talking about a certain kind of practiced sin that is openly condemned in the Bible. And by flock, of course I'm talking about the church.

I'm sure the man is a fine man. Could be the nicest guy in the world for all I know, but I think he did the right thing. He put his brethren first. That is the definition of love, and he should be commended.
 
Upvote 0