You just wanted him to mess up his monitor again, eh? LOLchalice_thunder said:Ah - gotcha. Anyway, I was just trying to razz tulc for using gay culture.
MQTA said:You just wanted him to mess up his monitor again, eh? LOL
--MQTA (what a way to communicate, parenthetically speaking)
Can we not promote homosexuality?
I can see I'm going to have to promote a serious case of WATER FIGHT!i dont see anyone promoting anything,
"Progessive" ideas ----> moral decline and decay ----> weak national and social infrastructure ----> failure to govern and protect nation ----> takeoever by another nation or group ----> repentance and re-institutionalization of morality and God in culture ----> the cycle begins again
How far would we be in civil rights? Rapists would have the right to rape under law, and would be protected by law to commit such acts against women and children. Also, mothers would have the right to kill their kids at any age after birth, under 18--new modern expanded definition of abortion. Middle-aged and young would have the right to kill off their elderly.
Sounds unthinkable? So did gay marriage and abortion. You'd all be killing and devaluing each other if it weren't for us.
If you want an excuse to hate other people for their politics, then I'm glad to be your scapegoat.Aren't you just a ray of sunshine. You do much to credit the conservative view of liberals, I assure you.
feral said:If you want an excuse to hate other people for their politics, then I'm glad to be your scapegoat.
feral said:If people don't want to be a part of the U.S., I don't feel we should force them. I would much rather oust the conservatives then have to put up with all the problems they bring.
Disagreeing with a group of people (conservatives in this case) doesn't mean I hate them. I simply do see conservatives as dragging their feet and opposing civil rights...and I don't mean all, it's just a generalization. My opinion on this plan of seceeding is that if they don't like it they can go. I would rather have people leave then to stay and continue protesting and complaining about civil rights advancement. Sorry if that came out sounding snarly last time, I was laughing when I wrote it.Thank you, but I don't hate someone for their politics. However, i hope you don't either, but these were your words:
tulc said:I can see I'm going to have to promote a serious case of WATER FIGHT!
(tulc pulls out Ol'Betsy! and commenses to whup!)(first he fires a barrage of water balloons at USincognito!
[move]OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO[/move]
(that's for making me spray stuff all over my screen from laughing!)
(then tulc sprays chalice_thunder with a few giant water balloons)
[updown][/updown]
[updown]OOO[/updown]
[updown]OOOO[/updown]
[updown]OOOOO[/updown]
(just because he...well he....alright I'm just doing it because
"hey annoying is what I do!")
(then he just sprays some random water balloons around to annoy elanor, Bigtoe and mqta!)
[pong]ooooo[/pong]
[pong]ooooooooo[/pong]
[pong]ooooo[/pong]
[pong]oooooooooo[/pong]
tulc(who isn't gay, just really really in touch with his feminine side! )
You've been too educated in the evils of conservatism, and see very little evil in liberal thought.feral said:I am quite disappointed with your failure to use a logical argument and your use of the slippery slope fallacy. Progressive civil rights does not mean permitting rapists to rape, and I think you know that. As a woman, I am quite insulted to be told that being pro-civil rights is akin to wanting to murder my grandmother, or wanting to be raped. Certainly both of those examples are a far cry from civil rights, and exactly the thing prople who care about civil rights want to protect. I've been labeled a liberal here despite being pro-life, so your comment about mothers killing their children after birth is also offensive and crazy. What a scary world you must live in, if you think people really want these things you've mentioned. I sometimes wonder if people who use these extreme, outlandish arguments are just trying to score points instead of really contribute to any meaningful dialogue.
If it wasn't for the conservatives, freedom of the slaves wouldn't have taken so long. It was conservative churches which preached the virtue of slavery. If it wasn't for conservatives, no one would have stood in the door of the schools blocking integration. Prince Edward County VA, which closed all of its schools to protest integration, had conservative leadership. It was conservatives who burned crosses in the lawns of African Americans, not liberals. It was conservatives who protested the women's movement and condemned women who sought the vote. It is conservatives now who protest the rights of homosexuals to get married, preferring, as they have in the past, to support discrimination. You are the brakes on the train, not the only ones saving us from a world of chaos and anarchy. And I don't mean you personally, but the conservative movement in general. You are not saving us from "killing and devaluing" one another - it's the conservative movement that supports the death penalty and protests against women's rights .
If you want an excuse to hate other people for their politics, then I'm glad to be your scapegoat.
aeroz19 said:Right-to-die activists push for the murder of the elderly, severly-handicapped, and other such people they devalue and claim are "invaluable" to society. Such thinking, if not restrained by conservative brakes, would lead to labeling anyone "invalueable" to society, thus needing to be killed off.
By saying "right-to-die," I was referring to those who practice assisted suicide.BigToe said:by right-to-die i assume you mean pro-choice and would ask that in the future you please refrain from that wording as its very offensive and portrays a completely illogical and incorrect view of what pro-choice is. thanks!
I am getting hate vibes from you.USincognito said:Your Jedi mind tricks won't work on us.
Hyperbole only is effective on your fellow ditto heads. Try making an intellectual point without pumping it so full of emotion that it's ready to explode like an overgorged tick. The Right to Die movement is nothing like the Eugenicists of the 1920s and 1930s.
tulc said:You better stop or I'm going to hold my breath till I pass out!!
tulc(ohhh look at all the pretty colors!)
aeroz19 said:I am getting hate vibes from you.
aeroz19 said:By the way, adding emotion to logic does nothing to delute the logic. You atheists are so big on logic. I knew an atheist for about a year in College; all he knew was logic. He had no personality and no sense of humor--just logic. He was pretty dull to talk to. My math instructor is also an atheist, and he also lacks personality.
aeroz19 said:I'm not saying all atheists lack personality. Maybe it was coincidence. You certainly seem to have a personality and a sense of humor.
aeroz19 said:From the tone and content of your posts, I gather that you also have a hatred for Christians--maybe for people of other faiths too.