Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
So you finally concede that what I said exists. Most likely you want to argue that this perception among voters, including independents, centrists, and certain democrats is incorrect.
You got that from me saying it's not true?
If this perception does exist, it's contrary to reality.
Not saying otherwise. I just asked you to substantiate your claim, and you cannot.
No, it was "Yes, I've heard it before". But perhaps I gave you too much credit.
There's absolutely no reason why you should be in the dark about it. Your posts have pretty much said, "I don't know anything about it", "I'm not able to look it up", and "Explain it to me".
I find what Bill Maher has to say about it interesting. And he's not an R. He seems to be more along the lines of exasperated that the democrat party is self destructing.
Its both real and overblown. When you look at typical D candidates they arent nearly as radical as "the discussion" would lead you to believe. But "the discussion" prefers hot stuff thats not-complicated (like economics is) and gets the blood going. And that causes damage.
I think the Democrats have mistake women for people. That's probably it.
Those Grays don’t have a lot of champions. Champions tend to occur at the extremes, where much of the electorate seems to focus their limited attention, thus it looks black and white while reality is a veritable explosion of color and hues.
Yes, I have heard the claim that the Democratic party is "radically liberal" before. It's unsubstantiated, unsupported, and untrue. It's an intentional mischaracterization by some on the right, and it has no basis in reality.
None of which I've said. Please stop attributing quotes to me I never said.
In your opinion. But many people have that perception of the democrat party nonetheless. The point being that it's not just the republican party that's experiencing dissatisfaction.
It's called paraphrasing. I used quote marks to avoid you doing the switcheroo which I've experienced before from you.
All I did was state its existence and its influence. Do you deny that there are centrists, independents, and even democrats who perceive that the democrat party has become radically liberal? And that this perception probably influences how they vote or influences them to not vote at all?
Can you accept that there are centrists, independents and democrats who perceive it as being true?
Thank you for sharing your personal beliefs.
It's still false. And the fact that you haven't been able to show otherwise just proves it.
Of course. As Will Rogers can attest, that's long been an issue among Democrats. It's a party of oftentimes wildly different ideas, some at odds with each other, and has never been of one mind, much less a radically liberal one.
What are you talking about? Are you trying to accuse me of something?
I suppose it's possible some hold this misapprehension, but it remains false, no matter who believes the lie.
Who are these people? What have they said? What are they basing this perception on? I need more information, otherwise I'm simply taking your word for it.
You're very welcome. Any time.
I never said it was true or false, I only said it exists. Whereas you adamantly claim that it's false. Therefore since you're the one making the claim that it's false, it's up to you to prove that your claim is accurate. And since I never said your claim is wrong, I don't have to provide proof along those lines.
Will Rogers died 90 years ago. His assessment of the democrat party is what it was like a century ago.
I've pointed out a few times that thought this exchange you've unwittingly conveyed that you don't anything about the subject, that you can't look up information about it to get answers, and that you need me to teach you about it.
You demand proof for claims that were not made by me, and fail to provide proof for claims that are being made by you.
Well since you've said you know about and you have claimed that they're lying, you should already know the answers to those questions.
