• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

The Investigative Judgment or Pre-Advent Judgement.

reddogs

Contributor
Site Supporter
Dec 29, 2006
9,518
573
✟646,707.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Exactly the point. The wicked are not included in the Adventist IJ:

So in the great day of final atonement and investigative judgment the only cases considered are those of the professed people of God. The judgment of the wicked is a distinct and separate work, and takes place at a later period. (The Great Controversy, 480)​
The Adventist IJ is an individual judgment on believers. The judgment in Daniel 7 involves beast powers, strips their power, etc. And Daniel 7 includes the righteous inheriting the kingdom, which they do not do in the Adventist IJ until later.

It doesn't match up.

Jesus interprets Daniel 7 for us:

Daniel 7:13-14
13 “I was watching in the night visions,
And behold, One like the Son of Man,
Coming with the clouds of heaven!
He came to the Ancient of Days,
And they brought Him near before Him.
14 Then to Him was given dominion and glory and a kingdom,
That all peoples, nations, and languages should serve Him.
His dominion is an everlasting dominion,
Which shall not pass away,
And His kingdom the one
Which shall not be destroyed. (NKJV)


Jesus interprets this for us:


Matthew 24:30 Then the sign of the Son of Man will appear in heaven, and then all the tribes of the earth will mourn, and they will see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven with power and great glory. 31 And He will send His angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they will gather together His elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other.​

Matthew 25:31 When the Son of Man comes in His glory, and all the holy angels with Him, then He will sit on the throne of His glory. 32 All the nations will be gathered before Him, and He will separate them one from another, as a shepherd divides his sheep from the goats. 33 And He will set the sheep on His right hand, but the goats on the left. 34 Then the King will say to those on His right hand, ‘Come, you blessed of My Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world.​
The saints inherit the kingdom--that does not happen in the Adventist IJ. But it does in Daniel 7:
21 “I was watching; and the same horn was making war against the saints, and prevailing against them, 22 until the Ancient of Days came, and a judgment was made in favor of the saints of the Most High, and the time came for the saints to possess the kingdom. (NKJV)
Ah, my brother, the wicked come before Christ at the Great white throne Judgement and guess who will come in as the jury.
Revelation 20:4
And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.
Revelation 20:11-15
11 And I saw a great white throne, and him that sat on it, from whose face the earth and the heaven fled away; and there was found no place for them.
12 And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works.

We are the jury, so we do judge guilty or innocent so to speak...
1 Corinthians 6:2-3
2 Do ye not know that the saints shall judge the world? and if the world shall be judged by you, are ye unworthy to judge the smallest matters?
3 Know ye not that we shall judge angels? how much more things that pertain to this life?

Before Christ’s second coming, God examines the lives of those who claimed to be His people, “the house of God” or saints to determine who will be resurrected at the Second Coming and who will not. Satan is the accuser, but Jesus is the advocate and judge for the saints. Then during the 1,000 years between the first and second resurrection, the righteous reign as kings and priests. They judge the wicked and give a verdict At Christ’s return after the 1,000 years, the wicked are resurrected and judged according to the judgment written, I would compare to the written verdict from the jury.

But why am I telling you this Tall, you know this, but now you got to nick pick and find something to slam the truth. There is still time before probation closes, then the saints will be taken up and they "shall judge the world" as it says...
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

tall73

Sophia7's husband
Site Supporter
Sep 23, 2005
33,042
6,276
Visit site
✟1,162,895.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Ah, my brother, the wicked come before Christ at the Great white throne Judgement

You may note we were examining the context of Daniel 7. It is not the IJ because it includes the beast powers, which are not all professed followers of God.

The claim was that Daniel 7 shows the IJ. It doesn't. It shows the saints, clearly identified throughout the text as a group being persecuted by the little horn, and then they are delivered by the judgment which puts to death the little horn. And it strips authority from other beasts. The fact that the various beasts are judged by the court indicate that this is not a judgment only on professed people of God. Babylon, the Medes and Persians, etc. were not all professed followers of God.


Before Christ’s second coming, God examines the lives of those who claimed to be His people, “the house of God” or saints to determine who will be resurrected at the Second Coming and who will not. Satan is the accuser, but Jesus is the advocate and judge for the saints.
You have not addressed the problem with this view. If the onlooking heavenly intelligences didn't trust God to know His own and needed to vindicate God's judgment through investigation, then you have skipped a step. Why would they accept the characterization of who claimed to be professed followers of God without similar investigation?

And of course, I have noted texts that talk about how Christ investigates them in person, not in absentia. We bow, kneel, stand, give account, receive rewards. That is not describing the Adventist IJ.

Ellen White says of the Adventist IJ:

The righteous and the wicked will still be living upon the earth in their mortal state—men will be planting and building, eating and drinking, all unconscious that the final, irrevocable decision has been pronounced in the sanctuary above.​

So how can they kneel, bow, confess, receive reward, etc.at the judgment seat of Christ when they don't even know it happened? These do not match up.


Then during the 1,000 years between the first and second resurrection, the righteous reign as kings and priests.

Yes.
They judge the wicked and give a verdict At Christ’s return after the 1,000 years, the wicked are resurrected and judged according to the judgment written, I would compare to the written verdict from the jury.

We know from Corinthians that we will judge the world and angels. No issue there. Though the details are a bit short in that passage. We also know those who are in the first resurrection in Revelation will be kings and priests. No issue there.

It doesn't say anything about a jury at the great white throne judgment. Some of your points there are inferrence.

What is more clear is that Jesus pinpoints the time the secrets of men's heart will be revealed and it is at His coming.

1 Corinthians 4:3-5​
3 But with me it is a very small thing that I should be judged by you or by a human court. In fact, I do not even judge myself. 4 For I know of nothing against myself, yet I am not justified by this; but He who judges me is the Lord. 5 Therefore judge nothing before the time, until the Lord comes, who will both bring to light the hidden things of darkness and reveal the counsels of the hearts. Then each one’s praise will come from God. (NKJV)​

Paul indicates that he will be judged, and others, at Jesus' coming. That is when the counsels of the hearts will be revealed.

The judgment of the wicked, we both agree, is AFTER, not before, Jesus' coming. But Paul also puts the judgment of himself, etc. as at Jesus' coming.

The texts are plain.

10 But why do you judge your brother? Or why do you show contempt for your brother? For we shall all stand before the judgment seat of Christ. 11 For it is written:​
“As I live, says the LORD,​
Every knee shall bow to Me,​
And every tongue shall confess to God.”​
12 So then each of us shall give account of himself to God. 13 (NKJV)​

This is not speaking of the Adventist concept of the investigative judgment. Because in the Adventist concept, you won't know your case has even come up, you are not present, you don't take actions.


But here

  • We will stand before the judgment seat
  • we kneel,
  • bow
  • confess
  • give an account
Paul includes himself,and addresses believers, so this is a judgment that includes believrs. But they are not absent, as in the Adventist IJ, and they are not unaware it is happening.

I certainly believe Romans 14 will happen, but it is not the Adventist IJ.

10 For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, that each one may receive the things done in the body, according to what he has done, whether good or bad. (NKJV)​

This also is not the Adventist IJ.

We

  • appear before the judgment seat of Christ
  • we RECEIVE according to what we have done.
That again is not the Adventist IJ, where we do not actually appear, or receive our reward.

Matthew 25 speaks of judgment before the throne when Jesus comes:

Matthew 25:31 “When the Son of Man comes in His glory, and all the holy angels with Him, then He will sit on the throne of His glory. 32 All the nations will be gathered before Him, and He will separate them one from another, as a shepherd divides his sheep from the goats. 33 And He will set the sheep on His right hand, but the goats on the left. 34 Then the King will say to those on His right hand, ‘Come, you blessed of My Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world: 35 for I was hungry and you gave Me food; I was thirsty and you gave Me drink; I was a stranger and you took Me in; 36 I was naked and you clothed Me; I was sick and you visited Me; I was in prison and you came to Me.’ 37 “Then the righteous will answer Him, saying, ‘Lord, when did we see You hungry and feed You, or thirsty and give You drink? 38 When did we see You a stranger and take You in, or naked and clothe You? 39 Or when did we see You sick, or in prison, and come to You?’ 40 And the King will answer and say to them, ‘Assuredly, I say to you, inasmuch as you did it to one of the least of these My brethren, you did it to Me.’ 41 “Then He will also say to those on the left hand, ‘Depart from Me, you cursed, into the everlasting fire prepared for the devil and his angels: 42 for I was hungry and you gave Me no food; I was thirsty and you gave Me no drink; 43 I was a stranger and you did not take Me in, naked and you did not clothe Me, sick and in prison and you did not visit Me.’44 “Then they also will answer [d]Him, saying, ‘Lord, when did we see You hungry or thirsty or a stranger or naked or sick or in prison, and did not minister to You?’ 45 Then He will answer them, saying, ‘Assuredly, I say to you, inasmuch as you did not do it to one of the least of these, you did not do it to Me.’ 46 And these will go away into everlasting punishment, but the righteous into eternal life.”​


Here all are brought before His throne, some object, but He points to their record. This is a direct reference to the throne of judgment, and it is in person, not like the Adventist IJ. It is at His coming. All things are revealed, there is investigation, but it happens before the Lord.


Matthew 7:21 “Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father in heaven. 22 Many will say to Me in that day, ‘Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in Your name, cast out demons in Your name, and done many wonders in Your name?’ 23 And then I will declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness!’​

This does not refer to the Adventist IJ. In the Adventist IJ, per Ellen White, you won't be objecting, because you won't know when your case comes up.

The parable of the talents is another example of investigation, appearing, receiving reward, and it happens after Jesus comes.


Matthew 25:19 After a long time the lord of those servants came and settled accounts with them.​

The Lord returns after a long time, and settles accounts. This is happening on earth, after the second coming.

Matthew 25:20 “So he who had received five talents came and brought five other talents, saying, ‘Lord, you delivered to me five talents; look, I have gained five more talents besides them.’ 21 His lord said to him, ‘Well done, good and faithful servant; you were faithful over a few things, I will make you ruler over many things. Enter into the joy of your lord.’ 22 He also who had received two talents came and said, ‘Lord, you delivered to me two talents; look, I have gained two more talents besides them.’ 23 His lord said to him, ‘Well done, good and faithful servant; you have been faithful over a few things, I will make you ruler over many things. Enter into the joy of your lord.’​
24 “Then he who had received the one talent came and said, ‘Lord, I knew you to be a hard man, reaping where you have not sown, and gathering where you have not scattered seed. 25 And I was afraid, and went and hid your talent in the ground. Look, there you have what is yours.’​
26 “But his lord answered and said to him, ‘You wicked and lazy servant, you knew that I reap where I have not sown, and gather where I have not scattered seed. 27 So you ought to have deposited my money with the bankers, and at my coming I would have received back my own with interest. 28 So take the talent from him, and give it to him who has ten talents.​
29 ‘For to everyone who has, more will be given, and he will have abundance; but from him who does not have, even what he has will be taken away. 30 And cast the unprofitable servant into the outer darkness. There will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.’​

The servants appear before Him. They give an account of their stewardship of the talents He gave. He rewards those who were faithful. This judgment happens after the second coming. And they are present before Him and He asks for an account.


But why am I telling you this Tall, you know this, but now you got to nick pick and find something to slam the truth. There is still time before probation closes, then the saints will be taken up and they "shall judge the world" as it says...
reddogs, the real question is why your texts don't match your claims. Why you keep taking them out of context. Why you ignore a number of plain texts, etc.

This is not nitpicking. this is pointing out the whole foundation of the IJ is incorrect. It contradicts the timing spelled out in the text. It is in absentia, not in person as the texts indicated.

And the IJ contradicts the plain statements about Jesus' High Priestly ministry in Hebrews.
 
Upvote 0

The Liturgist

Traditional Liturgical Christian
Site Supporter
Nov 26, 2019
17,423
9,375
51
The Wild West
✟934,450.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Generic Orthodox Christian
Marital Status
Celibate
The official belief statement indicates it is for "heavenly intelligences" and to "vindicate" God.

I’ll start with the less problematic of those statements. Heavenly intelligences appears contrary to Divine Omniscience. If we believe God to be All Knowing and All Powerful then we can trust His decision making process to be perfectly correct without requiring any temporal component, particularly since according to John 1:2-3 Christ our True God created Time, therefore, Time did not pre-exist Creation (if it did and God created Creation in time then God is not God but merely a demiurge, since that would mean Time is a Dominion over Him, and thus we must reject that idea absolutely. It also appears contrary, if it is functioning as some cipher for God to disseminate His information to angels, to the idea of angels on a teleological level and the nature of angels as messengers between God and man and also would also represent a huge imperfection in God’s creation if He has to transmit information to the angels.

Now the more problematic of those statements is the idea God would require vindication, which is extremely problematic because again it threatens divine perfection, because, the question becomes, Vindicated before Whom? God is the Vindicator, not the Vindicated; He is entirely self-sufficient and the fullness and source of all Perfections; in His divinity God is so perfect and just as to be entirely beyond human comprehension. Who would presume to judge God?
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
54,495
12,283
Georgia
✟1,205,026.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
I’ll start with the less problematic of those statements. Heavenly intelligences appears contrary to Divine Omniscience.
intelligences on Earth (Adam and Eve for example) were obviously not "contrary to Divine omniscience" science God made man and that is not "contrary to God"

So then Heavenly intelligences made by God are also "not contrary to Divine omniscience"
If we believe God to be All Knowing and All Powerful then we can trust His decision
Indeed. So when HE decides to make other intelligence's and include them in the Dan 7:9-10 judgment process just as His own text says, we need not jump into some sort of confused state.

Rom 3:
4 ... let God be found true, though every man be found a liar, as it is written,
“That You may be justified in Your words,
And prevail when You are judged.”
5 But if our unrighteousness demonstrates the righteousness of God, what shall we say? The God who inflicts wrath is not unrighteous, is He? (I am speaking in human terms.) 6 May it never be! For otherwise, how will God judge the world

Taste AND SEE that the Lord is good Ps 34:8
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
54,495
12,283
Georgia
✟1,205,026.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
The claim was that Daniel 7 shows the IJ. It doesn't. It shows the saints, clearly identified throughout the text
My claim was that the combined info on Judgment that we have in Dan 7 and Rom 2 DOES in fact show that very Judgment process ans quoted in the texts above.

Only by ignoring the two section , the two texts in this very basic part of the topic can we argue that part 2 does not exist because it is not also spelled out in part 1.
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
54,495
12,283
Georgia
✟1,205,026.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
At the center of the Seventh-day Adventist sanctuary teaching, is the reference to the cleansing of the sanctuary in Daniel 8:14.

Dan 8:14 And he said unto me, Unto two thousand and three hundred days; then shall the sanctuary be cleansed.​
In Dan 7 and 8 we have two presentations of the problem dealing with saints persecuted by the wicked and then God solving the problem.

In Dan 7 the key event is the Judgment. That is what releases the saints from persecution in chapter 7, once it is complete
In Dan 8 that same event is called "the cleansing of the sanctuary"

In both cases, the event they described is the key to freeing the saints from the persecution that they both describe.
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
54,495
12,283
Georgia
✟1,205,026.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Dan 7:21-22 the judgment is passed "in favor of the saints" NASB
Dan 7:25-26 and against the wicked'

2 Cor 5:10 For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each one may be recompensed for his deeds in the body, according to what he has done, whether good or bad.

Rev 14:7
looks forward to that future time of judgment (future to the writing of Rev 14)
Exactly the point. The wicked are not included in the Adventist IJ:
you don't seem to know much about it.

The Adventist view is the Dan 7 view where the Judgment is passed in favor of the saints and the wicked are defeated/condemned
So in the great day of final atonement and investigative judgment the only cases considered are those of the professed people of God. The judgment of the wicked is a distinct and separate work, and takes place at a later period. (The Great Controversy, 480)​
The preAdvent Judgment condemns the wicked since the same decisions that says group A is the saints, MUST also default to declaring that those not in group A "Group B" is the wicked.

The Dan 7 judgment completes before the appearing of Christ just as the chapter says.
Then the Rev 20:4 judgment where the wicked are judged by the saints as the text says
Then the Rev 20:11-15 great white throne judgment of all the wicked
 
Upvote 0

tall73

Sophia7's husband
Site Supporter
Sep 23, 2005
33,042
6,276
Visit site
✟1,162,895.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
My claim was that the combined info on Judgment that we have in Dan 7 and Rom 2 DOES in fact show that very Judgment process ans quoted in the texts above.

Only by ignoring the two section , the two texts in this very basic part of the topic can we argue that part 2 does not exist because it is not also spelled out in part 1.

Bob, I didn't ignore them. I responded back in post 22.

But now I will respond again:\ so you can address it.

Romans 2:2-16​
2 But we know that the judgment of God is according to truth against those who practice such things. 3 And do you think this, O man, you who judge those practicing such things, and doing the same, that you will escape the judgment of God? 4 Or do you despise the riches of His goodness, forbearance, and longsuffering, not knowing that the goodness of God leads you to repentance? 5 But in accordance with your hardness and your impenitent heart you are treasuring up for yourself wrath in the day of wrath and revelation of the righteous judgment of God, 6 who “will render to each one according to his deeds”: 7 eternal life to those who by patient continuance in doing good seek for glory, honor, and immortality; 8 but to those who are self-seeking and do not obey the truth, but obey unrighteousness—indignation and wrath, 9 tribulation and anguish, on every soul of man who does evil, of the Jew first and also of the Greek; 10 but glory, honor, and peace to everyone who works what is good, to the Jew first and also to the Greek. 11 For there is no partiality with God.​
12 For as many as have sinned without law will also perish without law, and as many as have sinned in the law will be judged by the law 13 (for not the hearers of the law are just in the sight of God, but the doers of the law will be justified; 14 for when Gentiles, who do not have the law, by nature do the things in the law, these, although not having the law, are a law to themselves, 15 who show the work of the law written in their hearts, their conscience also bearing witness, and between themselves their thoughts accusing or else excusing them) 16 in the day when God will judge the secrets of men by Jesus Christ, according to my gospel. (NKJV)​

Once again, this is not the Adventist IJ. As is shown by:

  • The scope-It includes everyone who does evil or good. Not so the IJ. The only cases considered there are those of the "professed people of God".
So in the great day of final atonement and investigative judgment the only cases considered are those of the professed people of God. The judgment of the wicked is a distinct and separate work, and takes place at a later period. (The Great Controversy, 480)​

  • It includes the rewards, which you don't receive at the Adventist IJ.. In fact you don't even know when your case comes up for review or when it is finished:

The righteous and the wicked will still be living upon the earth in their mortal state—men will be planting and building, eating and drinking, all unconscious that the final, irrevocable decision has been pronounced in the sanctuary above. GC, chapter 28​

Moreover it refers to the day when God will judge the secrets of men. That is not prior to the second coming, but plainly said to be AT Jesus coming. We are not to judge before the time when He comes:
1Corinthians 4:5 Therefore do not pronounce judgment before the time, before the Lord comes, who will bring to light the things now hidden in darkness and will disclose the purposes of the heart. Then each one will receive his commendation from God.​

We are not to pronounce judgment before the time, before He comes. When He comes He will bring to light hidden things and disclose the purposes of the heart. This is plain as can be, you and did not address it.

It also includes receiving the reward.

And likewise you ignore these other texts that say when the judgment will occur


Matthew 25 speaks of judgment before the throne when Jesus comes:

Matthew 25:31 “When the Son of Man comes in His glory, and all the holy angels with Him, then He will sit on the throne of His glory. 32 All the nations will be gathered before Him, and He will separate them one from another, as a shepherd divides his sheep from the goats. 33 And He will set the sheep on His right hand, but the goats on the left. 34 Then the King will say to those on His right hand, ‘Come, you blessed of My Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world: 35 for I was hungry and you gave Me food; I was thirsty and you gave Me drink; I was a stranger and you took Me in; 36 I was naked and you clothed Me; I was sick and you visited Me; I was in prison and you came to Me.’ 37 “Then the righteous will answer Him, saying, ‘Lord, when did we see You hungry and feed You, or thirsty and give You drink? 38 When did we see You a stranger and take You in, or naked and clothe You? 39 Or when did we see You sick, or in prison, and come to You?’ 40 And the King will answer and say to them, ‘Assuredly, I say to you, inasmuch as you did it to one of the least of these My brethren, you did it to Me.’ 41 “Then He will also say to those on the left hand, ‘Depart from Me, you cursed, into the everlasting fire prepared for the devil and his angels: 42 for I was hungry and you gave Me no food; I was thirsty and you gave Me no drink; 43 I was a stranger and you did not take Me in, naked and you did not clothe Me, sick and in prison and you did not visit Me.’44 “Then they also will answer [d]Him, saying, ‘Lord, when did we see You hungry or thirsty or a stranger or naked or sick or in prison, and did not minister to You?’ 45 Then He will answer them, saying, ‘Assuredly, I say to you, inasmuch as you did not do it to one of the least of these, you did not do it to Me.’ 46 And these will go away into everlasting punishment, but the righteous into eternal life.”​

Here all are brought before His throne, some object, but He points to their record. This is a direct reference to the throne of judgment, and it is in person, not like the Adventist IJ. It is at His coming. All things are revealed, there is investigation, but it happens before the Lord.

Matthew 7:21 “Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father in heaven. 22 Many will say to Me in that day, ‘Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in Your name, cast out demons in Your name, and done many wonders in Your name?’ 23 And then I will declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness!’​

This does not refer to the Adventist IJ. In the Adventist IJ, per Ellen White, you won't be objecting, because you won't know when your case comes up.

The parable of the talents is another example of investigation, appearing, receiving reward, and it happens after Jesus comes.


Matthew 25:19 After a long time the lord of those servants came and settled accounts with them.​

The Lord returns after a long time, and settles accounts. This is happening on earth, after the second coming.


Matthew 25:20 “So he who had received five talents came and brought five other talents, saying, ‘Lord, you delivered to me five talents; look, I have gained five more talents besides them.’ 21 His lord said to him, ‘Well done, good and faithful servant; you were faithful over a few things, I will make you ruler over many things. Enter into the joy of your lord.’ 22 He also who had received two talents came and said, ‘Lord, you delivered to me two talents; look, I have gained two more talents besides them.’ 23 His lord said to him, ‘Well done, good and faithful servant; you have been faithful over a few things, I will make you ruler over many things. Enter into the joy of your lord.’​
24 “Then he who had received the one talent came and said, ‘Lord, I knew you to be a hard man, reaping where you have not sown, and gathering where you have not scattered seed. 25 And I was afraid, and went and hid your talent in the ground. Look, there you have what is yours.’​
26 “But his lord answered and said to him, ‘You wicked and lazy servant, you knew that I reap where I have not sown, and gather where I have not scattered seed. 27 So you ought to have deposited my money with the bankers, and at my coming I would have received back my own with interest. 28 So take the talent from him, and give it to him who has ten talents.​
29 ‘For to everyone who has, more will be given, and he will have abundance; but from him who does not have, even what he has will be taken away. 30 And cast the unprofitable servant into the outer darkness. There will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.’​

The servants appear before Him. They give an account of their stewardship of the talents He gave. He rewards those who were faithful. This judgment happens after the second coming. And they are present before Him and He asks for an account.

These are all plain texts that speak of individual judgment, deciding of cases, revealing the secret things, etc. and they are all after Jesus' coming.

Meanwhile you argue that Daniel 7 is describing the Adventist IJ.

But it is not.

As noted above the Adventist IJ is only on the professed people of God. But the judgment in Daniel 7 is on beast powers, Babylon, Medes and Persians, Greece, and fourth beast and the little horn.

That doesn't match the criteria. Babylonians and Medes and Persians were not all professed followers of God.

Daniel 7:11-12​
11 “I watched then because of the sound of the pompous words which the horn was speaking; I watched till the beast was slain, and its body destroyed and given to the burning flame. 12 As for the rest of the beasts, they had their dominion taken away, yet their lives were prolonged for a season and a time. (NKJV)​


Moreover, it is not describing a judgment to figure out who the saints are. That was never in question. They are the ones the horn is making war against. They were the ones it was prevailing against. Until the Ancient of Days came, And then judgment was made in favor of the saints. Note it doesn't say "and then we figured out who the saints were through individual review. No it says God ruled in the favor of His saints, who were already a known group being persecuted.

Daniel 7:21-27​
21 “I was watching; and the same horn was making war against the saints, and prevailing against them, 22 until the Ancient of Days came, and a judgment was made in favor of the saints of the Most High, and the time came for the saints to possess the kingdom.​
23 “Thus he said:​
‘The fourth beast shall be​
A fourth kingdom on earth,​
Which shall be different from all other kingdoms,​
And shall devour the whole earth,​
Trample it and break it in pieces.​
24 The ten horns are ten kings​
Who shall arise from this kingdom.​
And another shall rise after them;​
He shall be different from the first ones,​
And shall subdue three kings.​
25 He shall speak pompous words against the Most High,​
Shall persecute the saints of the Most High,​
And shall intend to change times and law.​
Then the saints shall be given into his hand​
For a time and times and half a time.​

Note Bob, the saints were being persecuted by him and given into his hand already, before the court was seated. They were already known to be saints. That wasn't what the judgment was figuring out.

26 ‘But the court shall be seated,​
And they shall take away his dominion,​
To consume and destroy it forever.​

Judment was made in favor of the saints and against the little horn. The little horn's dominion was taken away and was consumed and destroyed.

27 Then the kingdom and dominion,
And the greatness of the kingdoms under the whole heaven,
Shall be given to the people, the saints of the Most High.
His kingdom is an everlasting kingdom,
And all dominions shall serve and obey Him.’ (NKJV)

This judgment ends with the saints inheriting the kingdom.


None of that matches the Adventist IJ. The saints don't inherit in the IJ. They don't even know when their case is reviewed.

The beast and little horn are not destroyed in the Adventist IJ.

And the dominion of Babylon, Medes and Persians and Greece are not taken away at the Adventist IJ.

Moreover, you didn't respond to Jesus' interpretation of this passage when He speaks of the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven in His glory and sitting on His throne. It happens at His coming:

Matthew 24:30 Then the sign of the Son of Man will appear in heaven, and then all the tribes of the earth will mourn, and they will see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven with power and great glory. 31 And He will send His angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they will gather together His elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other.​
Matthew 25:31 When the Son of Man comes in His glory, and all the holy angels with Him, then He will sit on the throne of His glory. 32 All the nations will be gathered before Him, and He will separate them one from another, as a shepherd divides his sheep from the goats. 33 And He will set the sheep on His right hand, but the goats on the left. 34 Then the King will say to those on His right hand, ‘Come, you blessed of My Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world.​

And you have not responded to the actual descriptions of judgment before God's throne which show we are present and interact:

10 But why do you judge your brother? Or why do you show contempt for your brother? For we shall all stand before the judgment seat of Christ. 11 For it is written:​
“As I live, says the LORD,​
Every knee shall bow to Me,​
And every tongue shall confess to God.”​
12 So then each of us shall give account of himself to God. 13 (NKJV)​

This is not speaking of the Adventist concept of the investigative judgment. Because in the Adventist concept, you won't know your case has even come up, you are not present, you don't take actions.

But here

  • We will stand before the judgment seat
  • we kneel,
  • bow
  • confess
  • give an account
Paul includes himself,and addresses believers, so this is a judgment that includes believrs. But they are not absent, as in the Adventist IJ, and they are not unaware it is happening.
2 Corinthians 5:10​
10 For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, that each one may receive the things done in the body, according to what he has done, whether good or bad. (NKJV)​

This also is not the Adventist IJ.

We

appear before the judgment seat of Christ
we RECEIVE according to what we have done.

That again is not the Adventist IJ, where we do not actually appear, or receive our reward.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

tall73

Sophia7's husband
Site Supporter
Sep 23, 2005
33,042
6,276
Visit site
✟1,162,895.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
In Dan 7 and 8 we have two presentations of the problem dealing with saints persecuted by the wicked and then God solving the problem.

In Dan 7 the key event is the Judgment. That is what releases the saints from persecution in chapter 7, once it is complete

Bob, once it is complete, the first beasts lose their dominion, the fourth beast is slain the little horn is consumed, and loses its dominion and the saints inherit the kingdom.

None of that happens in the Adventist IJ which is a case review of professed believers of God only, and doesn't involve the carrying out of the sentence at that time, and the righteous and wicked don't even know it happened until after, per Ellen White.



In Dan 8 that same event is called "the cleansing of the sanctuary"

In both cases, the event they described is the key to freeing the saints from the persecution that they both describe.

You just admitted your context problem Bob.

If Daniel 8 is about cleansing the sanctuary from the defilement of the little horn that is a different thing than the sins of all the people of God on the Day of Atonement. The sins on the Day of Atonement were those of all the camp--God's people. The defiling by the little horn is not that.

And the reason the context does not match up is because Adventists have changed the type.

Jesus entering the MHP ministry was the explanation for the great disappointment. But then when it was taking so long they then introduced th notion of the investigative judgment.

But the work of the high priest in the earthly sanctuary on the Day of Atonement was not an individual review of caess at all. Rather it was a corporate provision of atoning blood for the whole camp. Those who availed themselves of it and afflicted themselves, etc. were benefitted by it.

Adventists have read books and investigation into Lev. 16 when it is not present. And they thereby changed the type.
 
Upvote 0

tall73

Sophia7's husband
Site Supporter
Sep 23, 2005
33,042
6,276
Visit site
✟1,162,895.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
tall73 said: Exactly the point. The wicked are not included in the Adventist IJ:​
So in the great day of final atonement and investigative judgment the only cases considered are those of the professed people of God. The judgment of the wicked is a distinct and separate work, and takes place at a later period. (The Great Controversy, 480)​
The Adventist IJ is an individual judgment on believers. The judgment in Daniel 7 involves beast powers, strips their power, etc. And Daniel 7 includes the righteous inheriting the kingdom, which they do not do in the Adventist IJ until later.​
It doesn't match up.​
you don't seem to know much about it.

The Adventist view is the Dan 7 view where the Judgment is passed in favor of the saints and the wicked are defeated/condemned

The preAdvent Judgment condemns the wicked since the same decisions that says group A is the saints, MUST also default to declaring that those not in group A "Group B" is the wicked.

Daniel 7 didn't say "the judgment figured out who the saints were". It said judgment was given for the saints who were already identified.

And you claim I don't know much about it. But Ellen White makes it plain:

So in the great day of final atonement and investigative judgment the only cases considered are those of the professed people of God. The judgment of the wicked is a distinct and separate work, and takes place at a later period. (The Great Controversy, 480)​
The only cases considered were those of the professed people of God. The various beasts were not comprised only of professed people of God, yet their dominion was removed by that court. It doesn't match up. Those who were not professed followers of God could not even have their cases considered in the IJ, per Ellen White.

But moreover, you again missed the problem with Ellen White's description.

If the onlooking intelligences needed the books to know whether pepole were really true believers, and not just professed believers only, then why wouldn't they need to examine the books to know who the professed believers were to start with? They are not omnisicient. Ellen White's arrangement skips that entirely, which doesn't make sense if the purpose is to vindicate God.


The Dan 7 judgment completes before the appearing of Christ just as the chapter says.
Not at all Bob. The judgment completes with the beasts losing their dominion and the last beast being slain:

Daniel 7:11-12​
11 “I watched then because of the sound of the pompous words which the horn was speaking; I watched till the beast was slain, and its body destroyed and given to the burning flame. 12 As for the rest of the beasts, they had their dominion taken away, yet their lives were prolonged for a season and a time. (NKJV)​

It concludes with the little horn also losing dominion, consumed, and with the saints inheriting the kingdom:

Daniel 7:26-27​
26 ‘But the court shall be seated,​
And they shall take away his dominion,​
To consume and destroy it forever.​
27 Then the kingdom and dominion,​
And the greatness of the kingdoms under the whole heaven,​
Shall be given to the people, the saints of the Most High.​
His kingdom is an everlasting kingdom,​
And all dominions shall serve and obey Him.’ (NKJV)​


I think folks will notice that, unlike the IJ when people don't even know it happened until later:

The righteous and the wicked will still be living upon the earth in their mortal state—men will be planting and building, eating and drinking, all unconscious that the final, irrevocable decision has been pronounced in the sanctuary above. Great Controversy Chapter 28.​
 
Upvote 0

The Liturgist

Traditional Liturgical Christian
Site Supporter
Nov 26, 2019
17,423
9,375
51
The Wild West
✟934,450.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Generic Orthodox Christian
Marital Status
Celibate
So then Heavenly intelligences made by God are also "not contrary to Divine omniscience"

What intelligences are we talking about?

In Heaven, why does God need time to convey information to the angels? Nothing in Scripture indicates angels require any time to receive information from God.

Indeed. So when HE decides to make other intelligence's and include them in the Dan 7:9-10 judgment process just as His own text says, we need not jump into some sort of confused state.

Nothing in that verse describes the passage of time or indicates that the Thrones, Powers Dominions and other choirs of angels, as they are correctly referred to, would require any time at all to process or disseminate information from God, neither does it explicitly state the specific Adventist “Investigative judgement” doctrine.

Once again you’re asking us to reject the plain meaning of the text in favor of a meaning which is esoteric and non-obvious which we have no evidence of any Christians talking about at important foundational events of the Church such as in the Cenacale at Pentecost on Sunday in 33 AD or at the Council of Jerusalem (in Acts 2 and Acts 15 respectively) or at the Holy Ecumenical Synods conducted by the Orthodox Church in Nicaea, Constantinople and Ephesus (with Roman Catholic representation at Nicaea and Ephesus only; the Second Ecumenical Synod which perfected our Creed was a purely Greek Orthodox affair and the reason for the first Eastern Orthodox-Roman Catholic schism was the Roman addition of the words “and the son” to that Creed in regards to the Procession of the Holy Spirit (the Filioque Controversy - this was resolved when Rome agreed to delete it; then they changed their mind in the 10th century and then in the 11th century Pope Leo IX attempted to impose this and other changes on the Orthodox on the basis of Papal Supremacy which we rejected and thus the current schism which remains with us into the reign of Leo XIV).
 
Upvote 0

reddogs

Contributor
Site Supporter
Dec 29, 2006
9,518
573
✟646,707.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
You may note we were examining the context of Daniel 7. It is not the IJ because it includes the beast powers, which are not all professed followers of God.

The claim was that Daniel 7 shows the IJ. It doesn't. It shows the saints, clearly identified throughout the text as a group being persecuted by the little horn, and then they are delivered by the judgment which puts to death the little horn. And it strips authority from other beasts. The fact that the various beasts are judged by the court indicate that this is not a judgment only on professed people of God. Babylon, the Medes and Persians, etc. were not all professed followers of God.



You have not addressed the problem with this view. If the onlooking heavenly intelligences didn't trust God to know His own and needed to vindicate God's judgment through investigation, then you have skipped a step. Why would they accept the characterization of who claimed to be professed followers of God without similar investigation?

And of course, I have noted texts that talk about how Christ investigates them in person, not in absentia. We bow, kneel, stand, give account, receive rewards. That is not describing the Adventist IJ.

Ellen White says of the Adventist IJ:

The righteous and the wicked will still be living upon the earth in their mortal state—men will be planting and building, eating and drinking, all unconscious that the final, irrevocable decision has been pronounced in the sanctuary above.​

So how can they kneel, bow, confess, receive reward, etc.at the judgment seat of Christ when they don't even know it happened? These do not match up.




Yes.


We know from Corinthians that we will judge the world and angels. No issue there. Though the details are a bit short in that passage. We also know those who are in the first resurrection in Revelation will be kings and priests. No issue there.

It doesn't say anything about a jury at the great white throne judgment. Some of your points there are inferrence.

What is more clear is that Jesus pinpoints the time the secrets of men's heart will be revealed and it is at His coming.

1 Corinthians 4:3-5​
3 But with me it is a very small thing that I should be judged by you or by a human court. In fact, I do not even judge myself. 4 For I know of nothing against myself, yet I am not justified by this; but He who judges me is the Lord. 5 Therefore judge nothing before the time, until the Lord comes, who will both bring to light the hidden things of darkness and reveal the counsels of the hearts. Then each one’s praise will come from God. (NKJV)​

Paul indicates that he will be judged, and others, at Jesus' coming. That is when the counsels of the hearts will be revealed.

The judgment of the wicked, we both agree, is AFTER, not before, Jesus' coming. But Paul also puts the judgment of himself, etc. as at Jesus' coming.

The texts are plain.

10 But why do you judge your brother? Or why do you show contempt for your brother? For we shall all stand before the judgment seat of Christ. 11 For it is written:​
“As I live, says the LORD,​
Every knee shall bow to Me,​
And every tongue shall confess to God.”​
12 So then each of us shall give account of himself to God. 13 (NKJV)​

This is not speaking of the Adventist concept of the investigative judgment. Because in the Adventist concept, you won't know your case has even come up, you are not present, you don't take actions.


But here

  • We will stand before the judgment seat
  • we kneel,
  • bow
  • confess
  • give an account
Paul includes himself,and addresses believers, so this is a judgment that includes believrs. But they are not absent, as in the Adventist IJ, and they are not unaware it is happening.

I certainly believe Romans 14 will happen, but it is not the Adventist IJ.

10 For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, that each one may receive the things done in the body, according to what he has done, whether good or bad. (NKJV)​

This also is not the Adventist IJ.

We

  • appear before the judgment seat of Christ
  • we RECEIVE according to what we have done.
That again is not the Adventist IJ, where we do not actually appear, or receive our reward.

Matthew 25 speaks of judgment before the throne when Jesus comes:

Matthew 25:31 “When the Son of Man comes in His glory, and all the holy angels with Him, then He will sit on the throne of His glory. 32 All the nations will be gathered before Him, and He will separate them one from another, as a shepherd divides his sheep from the goats. 33 And He will set the sheep on His right hand, but the goats on the left. 34 Then the King will say to those on His right hand, ‘Come, you blessed of My Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world: 35 for I was hungry and you gave Me food; I was thirsty and you gave Me drink; I was a stranger and you took Me in; 36 I was naked and you clothed Me; I was sick and you visited Me; I was in prison and you came to Me.’ 37 “Then the righteous will answer Him, saying, ‘Lord, when did we see You hungry and feed You, or thirsty and give You drink? 38 When did we see You a stranger and take You in, or naked and clothe You? 39 Or when did we see You sick, or in prison, and come to You?’ 40 And the King will answer and say to them, ‘Assuredly, I say to you, inasmuch as you did it to one of the least of these My brethren, you did it to Me.’ 41 “Then He will also say to those on the left hand, ‘Depart from Me, you cursed, into the everlasting fire prepared for the devil and his angels: 42 for I was hungry and you gave Me no food; I was thirsty and you gave Me no drink; 43 I was a stranger and you did not take Me in, naked and you did not clothe Me, sick and in prison and you did not visit Me.’44 “Then they also will answer [d]Him, saying, ‘Lord, when did we see You hungry or thirsty or a stranger or naked or sick or in prison, and did not minister to You?’ 45 Then He will answer them, saying, ‘Assuredly, I say to you, inasmuch as you did not do it to one of the least of these, you did not do it to Me.’ 46 And these will go away into everlasting punishment, but the righteous into eternal life.”​


Here all are brought before His throne, some object, but He points to their record. This is a direct reference to the throne of judgment, and it is in person, not like the Adventist IJ. It is at His coming. All things are revealed, there is investigation, but it happens before the Lord.


Matthew 7:21 “Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father in heaven. 22 Many will say to Me in that day, ‘Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in Your name, cast out demons in Your name, and done many wonders in Your name?’ 23 And then I will declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness!’​

This does not refer to the Adventist IJ. In the Adventist IJ, per Ellen White, you won't be objecting, because you won't know when your case comes up.

The parable of the talents is another example of investigation, appearing, receiving reward, and it happens after Jesus comes.


Matthew 25:19 After a long time the lord of those servants came and settled accounts with them.​

The Lord returns after a long time, and settles accounts. This is happening on earth, after the second coming.

Matthew 25:20 “So he who had received five talents came and brought five other talents, saying, ‘Lord, you delivered to me five talents; look, I have gained five more talents besides them.’ 21 His lord said to him, ‘Well done, good and faithful servant; you were faithful over a few things, I will make you ruler over many things. Enter into the joy of your lord.’ 22 He also who had received two talents came and said, ‘Lord, you delivered to me two talents; look, I have gained two more talents besides them.’ 23 His lord said to him, ‘Well done, good and faithful servant; you have been faithful over a few things, I will make you ruler over many things. Enter into the joy of your lord.’​
24 “Then he who had received the one talent came and said, ‘Lord, I knew you to be a hard man, reaping where you have not sown, and gathering where you have not scattered seed. 25 And I was afraid, and went and hid your talent in the ground. Look, there you have what is yours.’​
26 “But his lord answered and said to him, ‘You wicked and lazy servant, you knew that I reap where I have not sown, and gather where I have not scattered seed. 27 So you ought to have deposited my money with the bankers, and at my coming I would have received back my own with interest. 28 So take the talent from him, and give it to him who has ten talents.​
29 ‘For to everyone who has, more will be given, and he will have abundance; but from him who does not have, even what he has will be taken away. 30 And cast the unprofitable servant into the outer darkness. There will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.’​

The servants appear before Him. They give an account of their stewardship of the talents He gave. He rewards those who were faithful. This judgment happens after the second coming. And they are present before Him and He asks for an account.



reddogs, the real question is why your texts don't match your claims. Why you keep taking them out of context. Why you ignore a number of plain texts, etc.

This is not nitpicking. this is pointing out the whole foundation of the IJ is incorrect. It contradicts the timing spelled out in the text. It is in absentia, not in person as the texts indicated.

And the IJ contradicts the plain statements about Jesus' High Priestly ministry in Hebrews.
Truth is truth, whether in Daniel or Revelation, the Bible reveals itself and with the Holy Spirit guiding its unveil. That is why it says to study line upon line, precept upon precept, only the adversary seeks to hide truth or twist it till its unrecognizable or distorted...
 
Upvote 0

tall73

Sophia7's husband
Site Supporter
Sep 23, 2005
33,042
6,276
Visit site
✟1,162,895.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Truth is truth, whether in Daniel or Revelation, the Bible reveals itself and with the Holy Spirit guiding its unveil. That is why it says to study line upon line, precept upon precept, only the adversary seeks to hide truth or twist it till its unrecognizable or distorted...

I have been looking at every text you present. You have not even tried to do so. It is not twisting to look at a Bible text in its context to see what it says.

Now you speak of not hiding the truth. Ok, Then you should be able to explain how the texts you present to defend your view fit the Adventist IJ.

And to make sure I am not misrepresenting the IJ, we can note what Ellen White says:

The righteous and the wicked will still be living upon the earth in their mortal state—men will be planting and building, eating and drinking, all unconscious that the final, irrevocable decision has been pronounced in the sanctuary above. Great Controversy Chapter 28.​

Does she not say that both the righteous and the wicked will be unconscious that the final decision has been pronounced above?

The Adventist IJ is a review of cases, but the ones being reviewed are not aware that their case has come up.

Yet you presented Romans 14 and 2 Corinthians 5 as evidence for the Adventist IJ. And they don't match that:

Romans 14:10-13​
10 But why do you judge your brother? Or why do you show contempt for your brother? For we shall all stand before the judgment seat of Christ. 11 For it is written:​
“As I live, says the LORD,​
Every knee shall bow to Me,​
And every tongue shall confess to God.”​
12 So then each of us shall give account of himself to God. 13 (NKJV)​

We will
  • stand before the judgment seat
  • kneel
  • bow
  • confess
  • give an account
Paul includes himself,and addresses believers, so this is a judgment that includes believers. But they are not absent, as in the Adventist IJ, and they are not unaware it is happening.

How do you explain this?

2 Corinthians 5:10​
10 For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, that each one may receive the things done in the body, according to what he has done, whether good or bad. (NKJV)​

This also is not the Adventist IJ.

We
  • appear before the judgment seat of Christ
  • receive according to what we have done
That again is not the Adventist IJ, where we do not actually appear, or receive our reward.

So please explain how that can be.

Also, unless I missed it, you still have not spelled out how you get to 1844, which was the request that started this thread. If I present it you will say I am twisting it. So go ahead and present it.
 
Last edited:
  • Winner
Reactions: The Liturgist

The Liturgist

Traditional Liturgical Christian
Site Supporter
Nov 26, 2019
17,423
9,375
51
The Wild West
✟934,450.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Generic Orthodox Christian
Marital Status
Celibate
Truth is truth, whether in Daniel or Revelation, the Bible reveals itself and with the Holy Spirit guiding its unveil. That is why it says to study line upon line, precept upon precept, only the adversary seeks to hide truth or twist it till its unrecognizable or distorted...

So why then is it the majority of Christians who have done that, in many cases over their entire careers, such as St. Athanasius, who gave us the 27 book New Testament canon, or St. Basil the Great, or St. Augustine of Hippo, or St. John of Damascus, or the Roman Catholic systematic theologian St. Thomas Aquinas, who I don’t entirely agree with but his Scriptural knowledge was profound, or Saints Jan Hus and Jerome of Prague (both the accidental founders of Protestantism and holy martyrs in the Orthodox Church, whose praxis they were trying to restore in the Czech Lands and Slovakia) or Martin Luther, or Thomas Cranmer, or John Calvin, or John Wesley, or more recently Karl Barth or Blessed Seraphim Rose or Metropolitan Kallistos Ware, memory eternal, more in agreement with each other, despite some major disagreements on everything from iconography to the reception of the Eucharist by soldiers, than with Adventist doctrine?

Let me be clear the argument I am making - I am not engaging in an appeal to authority, rather, I am pointing out that, for those who do not accept as inspired prophecy the writings of Ellen G. White, Adventist doctrine is not Scripturally obvious. We see no trace of anyone with the specific set of doctrines and Scriptural interpretations that define the SDA interpretation of Scripture prior to the popularization of her writings among former Millerites in the aftermath of the Great Disappointment in the 19th century.
Rather the issue regarding the Investigative Judgement is that this doctrine just does not appear in the historical record prior to the 19th century, and when it does appear, it is inextricably linked to a date that was an attempt to calculate the time Christ would return, something that the Gospels make it clear is impossible (I don’t know what Miller thought he was doing, given the New Testament literally says “No man can know the day or the hour”, but what he did do was cause the Great Disappointment, an event which caused genuine spiritual distress for his followers in the “Burned Over” district of Upstate New York, who really did believe that Christ would return October 22, 1844.

We then see, only in the aftermath of this Great Disappointment, which was an erroneous prediction by George Miller, who unlike the early Seventh Day Adventists and his own publicist, did believe in the Trinity (but apparently did not regard it as important enough to stress that doctrine rather than to preach his attempt at calculating the return of Christ which the Gospel says is unknowable), the promulgation of the Investigative Judgement, the idea of Christ entering into the “Holies of Holies” in Heaven, which is itself an odd idea in that it presupposes a spiritual realm is divisible into rooms and spaces, on the date of October 22, 1844, while at the same time also not teaching the Trinity; the Adventists began teaching that Christ began an investigative judgement before the Ancient of Days.

This also directly led to early SDAs rejecting Trinitarianism, since in the full Investigative Judgement model, the Ancient of Days is the Father and Christ is the Son, strictly subordinated to Him. This view is entirely incompatible with the Patristic faith, which held that the Ancient of Days is Christ, since according to the Gospel of John, no one has seen God the Father except by seeing His Son, in whom the fullness of the Godhood dwells bodily.

Ellen G. White deserves a lot of credit for reintroducing Trinitarianism to Adventists with her 1898 book The Desire of Ages, which led to a shift that resulted in the SDAs formally accepting the Trinity as a foundational belief in the 1930s, but the real problem is that while she was able to fix that problem, she did not address other fundamental doctrinal irregularities such as the Investigative Judgement, which remains a serious doctrinal error because it is predicated on a disunity between the Father and Son, and what is worse, a lack of equality between the two and the status of Christ as Pantocrator - the one who will sit in judgement on us, not merely our Advocate, not a messenger or a prophet, but the actual Son of Man in whom humanity was definitively regenerated on the Cross.

This also explains I believe the emphasis on works righteousness and the use of terminology such as “the wicked” to refer to the damned (which makes me as a traditional Christian flinch because apart from Christ and a few very intimately connected to Him such as His moter, our glorious lady Theotokos and ever virgin Mary, I am not aware of anyone devoid of wickedness, and St. Paul makes it clear we are saved despite our wickedness and not on account of our virtue, of which we are lacking, a point Martin Luther sought to drive home in opposition to Roman Catholic legalism (paradoxically, in the false dichotomisitc criticism of the Roman church which preoccupies many Adventists they ignore the fact that their denomination does not only have its own infallible Magisterium in the writings of Ellen G. White held to be inspired prophecy but also stresses works righteousness at least as much as the Roman church did at the time of Martin Luther, before the reforms at the Council of Trent prohibited such practices as the sale of indulgences; this legalism was also directly contributory to the schism between the Roman church and the Orthodox in 1054 AD).

However the Roman Catholic Church even at is lowest low remained foundationally Trinitarian and anti-Nestorian and anti-Pelagian, whereas it does not appear that most Adventists are aware of the identity of Pelagius as a historical person or why it behooves all Christians to ensure that their doctrine is as far removed from his views as possible (since Pelagianism, in denying salvation through grace, created an issue that goes to the heart of the Gospel in the same way as denying the status of Christ as God Incarnate and the Holy Trinity; this is also why the recent suggestion by the Episcopal Church that Pelagius be rehabilitated and “celebrated for his historic contributions to Christianity” caused so much furore. Indeed the primary reason St. John Cassian and St. Augustine* are remembered as saints in the East and West respectively is their respective rejections of Pelagianism, and a fear of Pelagianism is largely responsible for some excesses of Calvinism (which loop around to resembling Pelagius, in the case of the Puritans who were Calvinists who detested Pelagius to the point of engaging in works righteousness).

* In the East, because we don’t use the Augustinian rejection of Pelagius, St. Augustine is instead venerated for his moral theology and his important writing such as The City of God, which preserved the hopes of the people of the Western Roman Empire by focusing their attention on treasures in Heaven even as their civilization came crashing down around them as wave after wave of Barbarian invasion obliterated most of their earthly treasures; the Earthly aquaducts ran dry and the fountains here stopped flowing, but in Paradise the Font of living water continued to shoot forth jets of salvific grace, and for reminding people of this and of other important things we regard Blessed Augustine as worthy of veneration even if we disagree with some aspects of his soteriology, but we absolutely agree with him that Pelagius was in grave error, along with Nestorius and Arius and Simon Magus and the later Iconoclasts, one of the gravest errors in the history of the Christian faith.
 
Upvote 0

reddogs

Contributor
Site Supporter
Dec 29, 2006
9,518
573
✟646,707.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I have been looking at every text you present. You have not even tried to do so. It is not twisting to look at a Bible text in its context to see what it says.

Now you speak of not hiding the truth. Ok, Then you should be able to explain how the texts you present to defend your view fit the Adventist IJ.

And to make sure I am not misrepresenting the IJ, we can note what Ellen White says:

The righteous and the wicked will still be living upon the earth in their mortal state—men will be planting and building, eating and drinking, all unconscious that the final, irrevocable decision has been pronounced in the sanctuary above. Great Controversy Chapter 28.​

Does she not say that both the righteous and the wicked will be unconscious that the final decision has been pronounced above?

The Adventist IJ is a review of cases, but the ones being reviewed are not aware that their case has come up.

Yet you presented Romans 14 and 2 Corinthians 5 as evidence for the Adventist IJ. And they don't match that:

Romans 14:10-13​
10 But why do you judge your brother? Or why do you show contempt for your brother? For we shall all stand before the judgment seat of Christ. 11 For it is written:​
“As I live, says the LORD,​
Every knee shall bow to Me,​
And every tongue shall confess to God.”​
12 So then each of us shall give account of himself to God. 13 (NKJV)​

We will
  • stand before the judgment seat
  • kneel
  • bow
  • confess
  • give an account
Paul includes himself,and addresses believers, so this is a judgment that includes believers. But they are not absent, as in the Adventist IJ, and they are not unaware it is happening.

How do you explain this?

2 Corinthians 5:10​
10 For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, that each one may receive the things done in the body, according to what he has done, whether good or bad. (NKJV)​

This also is not the Adventist IJ.

We
  • appear before the judgment seat of Christ
  • receive according to what we have done
That again is not the Adventist IJ, where we do not actually appear, or receive our reward.

So please explain how that can be.

Also, unless I missed it, you still have not spelled out how you get to 1844, which was the request that started this thread. If I present it you will say I am twisting it. So go ahead and present it.
Tall, if you do not have the love of the truth, then what is there. We see what happened with many of Christs disciples...

John 6:66
From that time many of his disciples went back, and walked no more with him.
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
54,495
12,283
Georgia
✟1,205,026.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
What intelligences are we talking about?
Angels would be a good example
In Heaven, why does God need time to convey information to the angels?
God needs time to convey facts to nonGod beings since nonGod beings are not omniscient.
You knew that already ... right?
Nothing in Scripture indicates angels require any time to receive information
all finite beings need time to receive and process information , since they are not omniscient.

Is this really "news" to you????
Nothing in that verse describes the passage of time
Hint: 'The books were opened" Dan 7:10
Hint: Rev 20 "the dead were judged out of those things written in the books"
hint: Rom 2 a detailed look at what each person has done..

How is it that you find this concept so difficult??

Why do you keep asking us to reject the plain reading of the text??
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
54,495
12,283
Georgia
✟1,205,026.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
You may note we were examining the context of Daniel 7. It is not the IJ because it includes the beast powers,
You failed once again to admit the obvious point that the act of identifying the saints must by definition identify those who are not

How is it that this concept is so difficult for you??
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
54,495
12,283
Georgia
✟1,205,026.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Daniel 7 didn't say "the judgment figured out who the saints were". It said judgment was given for the saints who were already identified.​

There is no "saints already identified before the judgment" text in all of Rom 2 and Dan 7.

Stick with the text

And you claim I don't know much about it. But Ellen White makes it plain:

She says "names are accepted... other names are rejected'. Do you simply "imagine" that the names rejected are still saints as well?
Seriously??

It seems to me that you are not even trying to deal with the subject as it is stated.

1. it is obvious that the saints are persecuted in Dan 7 the entire time the judgment of vs 9 and 10 is going on.
2. it is obvious that the wicked persecute the saints until the judgment completes according to Dan 7
3. It is obvious from scripture that many of the wicked eventually become Christians
4. IT is obvious from place like Jude 1 and Matt 18 that some of the saints fail to persevere firm to the end

So then when the judgment of Dan 7 completes Christ takes over as the text says and persecution ends.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

The Liturgist

Traditional Liturgical Christian
Site Supporter
Nov 26, 2019
17,423
9,375
51
The Wild West
✟934,450.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Generic Orthodox Christian
Marital Status
Celibate
all finite beings need time to receive and process information , since they are not omniscient.

Is this really "news" to you????

That’s Scripturally contradicted, in that the human nature of Christ, which was finite at least prior to His resurrection, the fullness of the Godhead dwelled bodily, which is infinite, and there is no Scriptural statement to the effect that Christ or any angel requires any amount of time to process information. Additionally since God is omnipotent, He can communicate an arbitrary amount in an arbitrary amount of time to a finite being as suits His pleasure, even an infinite amount of information, and indeed He has done this - we know this because of the ability of the Saints in Heaven to hear and answer millions of prayers for their intercession together with God, an ability that Adventists like to rhetorically deny them, but an ability which has a steady track record of miracles proving its veracity going back to the early Christians.

Indeed for the Eastern Orthodox this is the week of All Saints, yesterday being All Saints Day and next Sunday being the Sunday of the various saints of the different Orthodox lands, followed by the Sunday of the Holy New Martyrs of the Turkish Yoke and the Sunday of the Holy New Martyrs of Russia during the Communist persecution and so on, extending until the Feast of the Holy Apostles Saints Peter and Paul. Like in the West, All Saints Day is also the day in which all saints are venerated, not just those who are known to the Church by more specific identifiers (the equivalent of All Souls Day are the Soul Sabbaths throughout the year, such as the one before Trinity Sunday / Pentecost Sunday last week (the Eastern Orthodox celebrate the Feast of the Trinity and Pentecost together on the same day, whereas in the Western Rite including the Western Rite Orthodox the Feast of the Trinity is the Sunday after Pentecost).

Thus yes, what you say is very much “news” to me, in the sense that having not heard it from the Church Fathers nor read it in Scripture, it is novel, and I will reject it as an unfounded ontological speculation which is a denial of Divine Omnipotence.

Insofar as this position clashes not only with Divine Omnipotence but also the Incarnation, since Christ in the flesh was finite yet in Him the fullness of the Godhead - which is infinite, dwelled bodily, according to Scripture, I find this even more troubling than the extremely troubling second point that @tall73 raised, that being Vindication, since God requires no Vindication, for this being Adventists regard Christ to be the Archangel Michael the preceding statement is particularly troubling since it appears you’re imposing temporal limitations on He who according to John 1:1-3 is the Creator of Time.

There is also the fact that Scripture clearly declares God to be immutable and impassable, and yet the Investigative Judgement has God in the person of the Son “entering the Heavenly sanctuary” and engaging in an activity, which is a change in state which requires the temporal dimension, which as God He is not constrained by, and there is also the even more important fact that Scripture is clear that it is Christ who will judge us as Pantocrator and that no one has seen the Father at any time (He has been heard, but not seen) except through Christ - therefore the Ancient of Days cannot be the Father as is argued by the Investigative Judgement doctrine, for the Father is not seen. Why does Christ appear ancient? Well, because He is - co-eternal with the Father. The idea of some Western Christians that the Father is a bearded old man, a Zeus-like figure, is not Scriptural, but rather reflects the influence of the Hellenic Paganism that Adventists like to falsely claim impacted the doctrines of the Orthodox and others they disagree with (and that we’ve seen, for example, in the false assertion that rejection of Annhilationism is a capitulation to Hellenic Pagan influence, which is entirely false).

I had initially been inclined to regard this entire discussion of the issue of time required by “Heavenly Intelligences” as a sideshow, since the issue of God requiring a vindication as if He were an inhabitant of the Library of Babel (which by the way is a fascinating meditation on the nature of infinity by the Argentine novelist Borges and since this digression into the nature of finite and infinite beings has taken us outside the realm of Scripture, your remark to @tall73 to “stick with the text” notwithstanding, I would suggest it.

I had previously also been inclined to regard the Investigative Judgement as being a theologoumemnon that was not by itself problematic, but increasingly, on tracing it back to Miller’s erroneous calculation of the date of Christ’s return and the Great Disappointment and on analyzing the details of the doctrine, I find it impossible to reconcile with Scripture, specifically with those verses which relate to the Deity of Christ and the incarnation of God and the indwelling of the Holy Spirit and the creation of the universe, which is a problem, because the Incarnation is an essential Christian doctrine, something mentioned in the Creed, unlike the primary day of worship, wherein the Creed does not require worship on the First Day nor proscribe it on the Seventh (hence the Orthodox worship both days and cannot be accused of violating the Sabbath commandment even though we are not required ot keep it).
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
54,495
12,283
Georgia
✟1,205,026.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Angels would be a good example (of the other beings present in Dan 7:9-10)

God needs time to convey facts to nonGod beings since nonGod beings are not omniscient.
You knew that already ... right?

all finite beings need time to receive and process information , since they are not omniscient.
Is this really "news" to you????

Hint: 'The books were opened" Dan 7:10
Hint: Rev 20 "the dead were judged out of those things written in the books"
hint: Rom 2 a detailed look at what each person has done..

How is it that you find this concept so difficult??

Why do you keep asking us to reject the plain reading of the text??
That’s Scripturally contradicted, in that the human nature of Christ
How many "God men" do you think there are in Dan 7:9-10??
You are reaching for straws now.

In the mean time we still have

Dan 7: 9 “I kept looking
Until thrones were set up,
And the Ancient of Days took His seat;
His vesture was like white snow
And the hair of His head like pure wool.
His throne was ablaze with flames,
Its wheels were a burning fire.
10 “A river of fire was flowing
And coming out from before Him;
Thousands upon thousands were attending Him,
And myriads upon myriads were standing before Him;
The court sat,
And the books were opened.
 
Upvote 0